Movements designed to engage youth in tobacco control have been an important part of tobacco prevention for decades. Today, young people are increasingly diverse, and their primary issues of concern are gun control, racism, mental health, and climate change. To engage today’s young people, tobacco control programs need to draw connections between youth’s identities, top issues, and tobacco. UpRISE is a social justice youth tobacco control movement that engages diverse youth in identifying the root causes of youth nicotine use. In 2018–2019, 21 youth-serving organizations and schools hosted youth coalitions. Coalitions engaged in a six-session workbook called “Getting to the root cause,” and adults were provided training and reflective supervision. Pre/post surveys with youth participants (n = 180) and end-of-year interviews with adult facilitators (n = 22) were used to assess outcomes. The primary outcomes were supportive adult relationships, youth voice in decision-making, anti-tobacco industry attitudes and beliefs, psychological empowerment, critical consciousness, and global belief in a just world. Quantitative measures of supportive adult relationships, youth voice in decision-making, psychological empowerment, and anti-tobacco industry attitudes and beliefs all increased significantly over time (p < .0001, p < .0001, p < .0001, p = .0034, respectively). Critical consciousness and global belief in a just world did not change significantly. During interviews, adults reported learning how: to engage in youth–adult partnerships, the tobacco industry abused its power, to engage in critical reflection about power. Adults also felt empowered. UpRISE may be a promising approach to increase racially diverse youth’s engagement in social justice-oriented tobacco control efforts that advance equity.
AnyonY.RoscoeJ.BenderK.KennedyH.DeChantsJ.BegunS.Amoresano-GllagerC.CrawfordK.AcostaD.YoungD.CookM. (2019) Reconciling adaptation and fidelity: Implications for scaling up high quality youth voice programs. Journal of Primary Prevention. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30659405
3.
BakerA. M.BrookinsC. C. (2014). Toward the development of a measure of sociopolitical consciousness: Listening to the voices of Salvadoran youth. Journal of Community Psychology, 42(8), 1015–1032. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21668
4.
BozlakC.KelleyM. (2010). Youth participation in a community campaign to pass a Clean Indoor Air Ordinance. Health Promotion Practice, 11, 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908330815
5.
CardarelliK. M.IckesM.Huntington-MoskosL.WilmhoffC.LarckA.PinneyS. M.HahnE. J. (2021). Authentic youth engagement in environmental health research and advocacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2154.
ChristensB. D.PetersonN. A. (2012). The role of empowerment in youth development: A study of sociopolitical control as mediator of ecological systems’ influence on developmental outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(5), 623–635.
ConnerJ. O.OberC. N.BrownA. S. (2016). The politics of paternalism: Adult and youth perspectives on youth voice in public policy. Teachers College Record, 118(8), 1-48.
10.
CreamerM. R.Everett JonesS.GentzkeA. S.JamalA.KingB. A. (2020). Tobacco product use among high school students — Youth risk behavior survey, United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(Suppl. 1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su6901a7external icon
11.
DeJongK.LoveB. J. (2015). Youth oppression as a technology of colonialism: Conceptual frameworks and possibilities for social justice education praxis. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(3), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1057086
12.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.PachanM. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3), 294–309.
13.
FineA. D.RowanZ.SimmonsC. (2019). Do politics trump race in determining America’s youths’ perceptions of law enforcement?Journal of Criminal Justice, 61, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.01.003
GilkersonL. (2004). Irving B. Harris distinguished lecture: Reflective supervision in infant-family programs: Adding clinical process to nonclinical settings. Infant Mental Health Journal: Official Publication of the World Association for Infant Mental Health, 25(5), 424–439.
16.
GinwrightS.JamesT. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New Directions for Youth Development, 96, 27–46.
17.
GoddardT.MyersR. R. (2017). Against evidence-based oppression: Marginalized youth and the politics of risk-based assessment and intervention. Theoretical Criminology, 21(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480616645172
18.
GodwinS. (2011). Children’s oppression, rights, and liberation. Nw. Interdisc. L. Rev., 4, 247.
19.
HopeE. C.SpencerM. B. (2017). Civic engagement as an adaptive coping response to conditions of inequality: An application of phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST). In CabreraN.LeyendeckerB. (Eds.), Handbook on positive development of minority children and youth (pp. 421–435). Springer.
20.
IoannidisJ. P.PoweN. R.YancyC. (2021). Recalibrating the use of race in medical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 325(7), 623–624. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.0003
KohfeldtD.LanghoutR. D. (2012). The five whys method: A tool for developing problem definitions in collaboration with children. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(4), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1114
23.
LardierD. T.Jr.Garcia-ReidP.ReidR. J. (2018). The interacting effects of psychological empowerment and ethnic identity on indicators of well-being among youth of color. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(4), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21953
24.
LeeJ. P.Lipperman-KredaS.SaephanS.KirkpatrickS. (2012). Youth-led tobacco prevention: Lessons learned for engaging Southeast Asian American youth. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 6(2), 187–194.
25.
LevineM.EnsomM. H. (2001). Post hoc power analysis: An idea whose time has passed?Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 21(4), 405–409. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.21.5.405.34503
LipkusI. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(11), 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90081-L
28.
OzerE. J.SchotlandM. (2011). Psychological empowerment among urban youth: Measure development and relationship to psychosocial functioning. Health Education & Behavior, 38(4), 348–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198110373734
29.
RossL. (2011). Sustaining youth participation in a long-term tobacco control initiative: Consideration of a social justice perspective. Youth & Society, 43(2), 681–704.
30.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE.
SievingR. E.McReeA. L.McMorrisB. J.ShlaferR. J.GowerA. L.KapaH. M.ResnickM. D. (2017). Youth–adult connectedness: A key protective factor for adolescent health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(3), S275–S278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.037
33.
SocioCultural Research Consultants. (2018). Dedoose (Version 8.0.35, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data). www.dedoose.com
34.
SrivastavA.StrompolisM.KippC.RichardC. L.ThrasherJ. F. (2020). Moderating the effects of adverse childhood experiences to address inequities in tobacco-related risk behaviors. Health Promotion Practice, 21(1), 139S–147S.
35.
SterrettE. M.JonesD. J.McKeeL. G.KincaidC. (2011). Supportive non-parental adults and adolescent psychosocial functioning: Using social support as a theoretical framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3–4), 284–295.
36.
ThrasherJ. F.NiederdeppeJ. D.JacksonC.FarrellyM. C. (2006). Using anti-tobacco industry messages to prevent smoking among high-risk adolescents. Health Education Research, 21(3), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl001
37.
TravisR.Jr.LeechT. G. (2014). Empowerment-based positive youth development: A new understanding of healthy development for African American youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 93–116.
38.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2012). Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: A report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, & Office on Smoking and Health.
39.
VoightA.HansonT.O’MalleyM.AdekanyeL. (2015). The racial school climate gap: Within-school disparities in students’ experiences of safety, support, and connectedness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56(3), 252–267. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10464-015-9751-x
40.
WilliamsD. R.CooperL. A. (2019). Reducing racial inequities in health: Using what we already know to take action. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(4), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040606
41.
ZeldinS.ChristensB. D.PowersJ. L. (2013). The psychology and practice of youth-adult partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(3–4), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9558-y
42.
ZeldinS.KraussS. E.ColluraJ.LucchesiM.SulaimanA. H. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring youth–adult partnership in community programs: A cross national study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(3–4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9676-9
43.
ZeldinS.PetrokubiJ.MacNeilC. (2008). Youth-adult partnerships in decision making: Disseminating and implementing an innovative idea into established organizations and communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3), 262–277.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
