Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents a photovoice decision tree that serves as a guide for making lawful and ethical decisions during the portions of the photovoice process that involve photograph selection, caption development, and public display of photographs and captions. Lawful and ethical considerations encompass privacy of person, privacy of place, illegal acts and obscenity, defamation, representation of truth versus actual malice, and opinion versus assertion of fact, but do not address pursuing and obtaining institutional review board approval for photovoice projects and/or other important steps of photovoice projects that are beyond the scope of this article. The decision tree presumes that a comprehensive photo release process was completed with all photovoice participants and collected from any individual captured within a photograph. The decision tree has important implications for research and practice, including movement of photovoice practitioners beyond the required institutional review board approval for research projects to consider lawful and ethical issues associated with photograph selection, caption development, and public display of photographs and captions. This decision tree can serve as a meaningful tool for all photovoice practitioners and participants to guide their lawful and ethical decisions.

Keywords

photovoice participatory photography visual methods captions legal issues ethical implications decision tree ethics participatory action research CBPR empowerment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/408/665/

Daily Times Democrat v. Graham, 162 So. 2d 474 (1964). https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/1964/162-so-2d-474-1.html

Devakumar

Brotherton

Halbert

Clarke

Prost

Hall

(2013). Taking ethical photos of children for medical and research purposes in low-research settings: An exploratory qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 14(1), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-27

Digital Media Law Project. (2021). False light. https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/false-light

DuBoff

L. D.

Tugman

S. J.

(2020). The law (in plain English) for photographers. Allworth Press.

Florida Star v. B.J.F., 491 U.S. 524 (1989). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/491/524/

Franchitto

Gavarri

Dédouit

Telmon

Rougé

(2008). Photography, patient consent and scientific publications: Medicolegal aspects in France. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 15(4), 210–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2007.08.004

Gertz. v. Welch, 418 U.S. 323, 345 (1974). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/323/

Hannes

Parylo

(2014). Let’s play it safe: Ethical considerations from participants in a photovoice research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300112

10.

Harley

(2012). Picturing reality: Power, ethics, and politics in using photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100402

11.

Holtby

Klein

Cook

Travers

(2015). To be seen or not to be seen: Photovoice, queer and trans youth, and the dilemma of representation. Action Research, 13(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750314566414

12.

Hutchinson v. Proxmire, 443 U.S. 111, 135 (1979). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/443/111/

13.

Joanou

J. P.

(2009). The bad and the ugly: Ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima, Peru. Visual Studies, 24(3), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860903309120

14.

Legal Information Institute. (2021). Public domain. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/public_domain#:~:text=The%20status%20of%20any%20creative,have%20expired%20or%20been%20abandoned

15.

Mikesell

Bromley

Khodyakov

(2013). Ethical community-engaged research: A literature review. American Journal of Public Health, 103(12), e7–e14. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.30160

16.

Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 23 (1973). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/413/15/

17.

Murray

Nash

(2017). The challenges of participatory photography: A critical reflection on methodology and ethics in two cultural contexts. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 923–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316668819

18.

New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/254/

19.

Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 (1987). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/481/497/

20.

Prins

(2010). Participatory photography: A tool for empowerment or surveillance? Action Research, 8(4), 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310374502

21.

Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 85 (1966). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/383/75/

22.

Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/562/443/

23.

Stellefson

Paige

S. R.

Alber

J. M.

Barry

A. E.

James

(2015). Proposing ethical practice standards for community-engaged research in health education. American Journal of Health Education, 46(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2014.997942

24.

Strack

R. W.

Lovelace

Jordan

Holmes

(2010). Framing photovoice using a socio-ecological logic model as a guide. Health Promotion Practice, 11(5), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839909355519

25.

Teti

Murray

Johnson

Binson

(2012). Photovoice as a community-based participatory research method among women living with HIV/AIDS: Ethical opportunities and challenges. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.4.34

26.

U.S. Copyright. (2021). U.S. Copyright Office definitions. https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/definitions.html#:~:text=A%20form%20of%20protection%20provided,%2C%20sculptural%2C%20and%20audiovisual%20creations

27.

Wang

C. C.

Redwood-Jones

Y. A.

(2001). Photovoice ethics: Perspectives from Flint photovoice. Health Education & Behavior, 28(5), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810102800504

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB