Creating the Scratch Cooked School Food Framework: Qualitative Data Analysis of a Scratch Cooking Pilot

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a novel framework that outlines the system required to implement scratch cooking in school kitchens. The data used in this study were 57 interviews with key stakeholders during the Return to Scratch Cooking Pilot that occurred in two New York City school kitchens in 2018–2019 and made significant modifications to many aspects of the existing school food system. The guiding framework for the data analysis was Meadows’s Intervention Level Framework. Intervention Level Framework describes analyzing systems by examining five layers: (1) paradigm shift, (2) goals, (3) system structure (4) feedback and delays, and (5) structural elements. It also provides a framework for describing a system by defining its elements, interconnections, and purpose. Data analysis revealed four elements of the school food system: ingredients and recipes, kitchen, cooking, and the community. The interconnections that played a role in each of these elements were policies, practice, people, and promotion. Together, these four elements and four interconnections comprise the Scratch Cooked School Food framework, which has the purpose of being a tool for researchers and practitioners to utilize when planning, implementing, and evaluating scratch cooking in the school food environment.

Keywords

scratch cooking school food Intervention Level Framework qualitative systems change childhood obesity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asada

Hughes

A. G.

Read

Schwartz

M. B.

Chriqui

J. F.

(2017). High school students’ recommendations to improve school food environments: Insights from a critical stakeholder group. Journal of School Health, 87(11), 842–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12562

Behrens

T. K.

Liebert

M. L.

Peterson

H. J.

Smith

J. F.

Sutliffe

J. T.

Day

Mack

(2018). Changes in school food preparation methods result in healthier cafeteria lunches in elementary schools. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 54(5 Suppl. 2), S139–S144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.008

Best

Greenhalgh

Lewis

Saul

J. E.

Carroll

Bitz

(2012). Large-system transformation in health care: A realist review. Milbank Quarterly, 90(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00670.x

Best

Holmes

(2010). Systems thinking, knowledge and action: Towards better models and methods. Evidence & Policy, 6(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426410X502284

Burt

K. G.

Koch

Contento

(2017). Development of the GREEN (Garden Resources, Education, and Environment Nexus) tool: An evidence-based model for school garden integration. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 117(10), 1517–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.02.008

Carey

Malbon

Carey

Joyce

Crammond

Carey

(2015). Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the field. BMJ Open, 5(12), Article e009002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009002

Carmichael

D. H.

Andersen

Masters

Vanslyke

Beadnell

(2016). Key ingredients for school food systems: An evaluation of the Orfalea Foundation’s School Food Initiative. The Foundation, 8(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1295

Chez Panisse Foundation. (2008). Lunch matters: How to feed our children better (The story of the Berkeley school lunch initiative).

Cohen

J. F.

Smit

L. A.

Parker

Austin

S. B.

Frazier

A. L.

Economos

C. D.

Rimm

E. B.

(2012). Long-term impact of a chef on school lunch consumption: Findings from a 2-year pilot study in Boston middle schools. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 112(6), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.01.015

10.

Collins

(2012). Can schools save kids’ palates? Cooking from scratch in schools: The greatest food service challenge of our time. Childhood Obesity, 8(4), 323–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2012.0076

11.

Durham

Schubert

Vaughan

Willis

C. D.

(2018). Using systems thinking and the Intervention Level Framework to analyse public health planning for complex problems: Otitis media in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. PLOS ONE, 13(3), Article e0194275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194275

12.

Johnston

L. M.

Matteson

C. L.

Finegood

D. T.

(2014). Systems science and obesity policy: A novel framework for analyzing and rethinking population-level planning. American Journal of Public Health, 104(7), 1270–1278. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301884

13.

Lavelle

McGowan

Spence

Caraher

Raats

M. M.

Hollywood

McDowell

McCloat

Mooney

Dean

(2016). Barriers and facilitators to cooking from “scratch” using basic or raw ingredients: A qualitative interview study. Appetite, 107, 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.115

14.

Leischow

S. J.

Best

Trochim

W. M.

Clark

P. I.

Gallagher

R. S.

Marcus

S. E.

Matthews

(2008). Systems thinking to improve the public’s health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(Suppl. 2), S196–S203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.014

15.

Lewallen

T. C.

Hunt

Potts-Datema

Zaza

Giles

(2015). The Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child Model: A new approach for improving educational attainment and healthy development for students. Journal of School Health, 85(11), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12310

16.

Luke

D. A.

Stamatakis

K. A.

(2012). Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. Annual Review of Public Health, 33, 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101222

17.

Meadows

D. H.

(1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system.

18.

Meadows

D. H.

(2008). Thinking in systems a primer ( Wright

, Ed.). Chelsea Green.

19.

Pawson

(2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. Sage.

20.

Sands

Whitmore

(2020). Transforming School Food, Transforming Communities: Ingredients for building a holistic school meal program in Springfield, MA. Springfield Public Schools, Sodexo, Mercy Medical Center, Springfield Food Policy Council, and Springfield’s Culinary and Nutrition Center Advisory Council.

21.

Schober

D. J.

Carpenter

Currie

Yaroch

A. L.

(2016). Evaluation of the LiveWell@ School Food Initiative shows increases in scratch cooking and improvement in nutritional content. Journal of School Health, 86(8), 604–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12413

22.

Stanley

Colasanti

K. J.

Conner

D. S.

(2012). A “real chicken” revolution: How two large districts are shifting the school poultry paradigm with scratch cooking. Childhood Obesity, 8(4), 384–387. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2012.0041

23.

Trent

Ijaz

A. D.

Koch

(2019). Cooking outside the box: How a scratch cooking pilot in the Bronx is reshaping meals in New York City Schools. Laurie M. Tisch Center for Food, Education & Policy, Program in Nutrition, Teachers College, Columbia University.

24.

Vincent

J. M.

Gunderson

Friedman

Brown

A. M.

Wilson

Gomez

(2020). Are California public schools scratch-cooking ready? A survey of food service directors on the state of school kitchens. Center for Cities & Schools.

25.

Woodward-Lopez

Kao

Kiesel

Miller

M. L.

Boyle

Drago-Ferguson

Braff-Guajardo

Crawford

(2014). Is scratch-cooking a cost-effective way to prepare healthy school meals with US Department of Agriculture foods? Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 114(9), 1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2014.05.002

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB