Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-1
Development of the Healthy Work Collaborative: Findings From an Action Research Study to Inform a Policy,Systems,and Environmental Change Capacity-Building Initiative Addressing Precarious Employment
Precarious employment (PE) is a complex problem that affects an increasing number of workers across all economic sectors who experience low wages, hazardous conditions, and few benefits, and results in adverse health outcomes. PE is characterized by nontraditional work arrangements, precluding workplace-based interventions. Policy, systems, and environmental initiatives that engage cross-sectoral stakeholders may be an applicable health promotion approach to address PE. The University of of Illinois at Chicago Center for Healthy Work’s Healthy Communities through Healthy Work (HCHW) is an outreach project of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health–funded Center of Excellence for Total Worker Health that conducted a multiphased qualitative action research (AR) study. AR designs may be a novel approach to develop initiatives to address problems like PE. This article reports on HCHW’s first AR phase to answer four research questions: (1) What are participants’ perceptions of PE? (2) What are participants’ perceptions of their roles in addressing PE? (3) What initiatives are under way that address PE? and (4) How can the findings be used to facilitate opportunities for healthy work? Key informant interviews with health (public health and health care; N = 23) and labor sector organizations (worker centers, worker advocacy organizations, and unions; N = 21) were conducted. Data were thematically analyzed alongside a chart-based content analysis, and shared in 11 key stakeholder meetings. Findings revealed an opportunity for the labor sector to improve health sector readiness to address PE in the context of health, and were used to develop the Healthy Work Collaborative, a cross-sectoral health promotion capacity building policy, systems, and environmenta change initiative to address PE.
AboelataM. J.NavarroA. M. (2010). Emerging issues in improving food and physical activity environments: Strategies for addressing land use, transportation, and safety in 3 California-wide initiatives. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2146–2148. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.193466
2.
AngerW. K.ElliotD. L.BodnerT.OlsonR.RohlmanD. S.TruxilloD. M.KuehlK. S.HammerL. B.MontgomeryD. (2015). Effectiveness of total worker health interventions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(2), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038340
3.
AsadaY.GilmetK.WelterC.Massuda-BarnettG.KapadiaD. A.FagenM. (2019). Applying theory of change to a structural change initiative: Evaluation of model communities in a diverse county. Health Education & Behavior, 46(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118818233
4.
AsadaY.LiebermanL. D.NeubauerL. C.HannekeR.FagenM. C. (2018). Evaluating structural change approaches to health promotion: An exploratory scoping review of a decade of U.S. progress. Health Education & Behavior, 45(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198117721611
5.
BenachJ.VivesA.AmableM.VanroelenC.TarafaG.MuntanerC. (2014). Precarious employment: Understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182500
6.
BenachJ.VivesA.TarafaG.DelclosC.MuntanerC. (2016). What should we know about precarious employment and health in 2025? Framing the agenda for the next decade of research. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(1), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv342
7.
Bibbins-DomingoK. (2020). This time must be different: Disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Internal Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2247
8.
BrixeyJ. J.RobinsonD. J.JohnsonC. W.JohnsonT. R.TurleyJ. P.PatelV. L.ZhangJ. (2007). Towards a hybrid method to categorize interruptions and activities in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(11–12), 812–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.018
ChehimiS.CohenL. (2013). Towards a 21st century approach: Advancing a vision for prevention and public health. Prevention Institute.
11.
CrispB. R.SwerissenH.DuckettS. J. (2000). Four approaches to capacity building in health: Consequences for measurement and accountability. Health Promotion International, 15(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.2.99
12.
DeSalvoK. B.WangY. C.HarrisA.AuerbachJ.KooD.O’CarrollP. (2017). Peer reviewed: Public Health 3.0: A call to action for public health to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Preventing Chronic Disease, 14, Article 170017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.170017
13.
DombrowskiR. D.MasonM.WelchS. B.WelterC.Massuda BarnettG.CedeñoA. (2013). Model communities as a strategy for achieving policy, systems and environmental change for obesity control and reduction. International Public Health Journal, 5(3), 225.
14.
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
15.
FreudenbergN.FranzosaE.ChisholmJ.LibmanK. (2015). New approaches for moving upstream. Health Education & Behavior, 42(1 Suppl.), 46S–56S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198114568304
16.
FriedenT. R.DietzW.CollinsJ. (2010). Reducing childhood obesity through policy change: Acting now to prevent obesity. Health Affairs, 29(3), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0039
17.
GarciaK. M.MartinE.GarneyW. R.PrimmK. M. (2018). Qualitative analysis of partnerships’ effect on implementation of a nationally led community-based initiative. Health Promotion Practice, 19(5), 775–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918779378
18.
GaleN. K.HeathG.CameronE.RashidS.RedwoodS. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), Article 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
19.
GoldenS. D.McLeroyK. R.GreenL. W.EarpJ. A. L.LiebermanL. D. (2015). Upending the social ecological model to guide health promotion efforts toward policy and environmental change. Health Education & Behavior, 42(1 Suppl.), 8S–14S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115575098
20.
GriffenA. K.RisleyK.PetrosM.WelterC. R. (2020). Inclusion wheel: Tool for building capacity and public health leaders to serve people with disabilities. Health Promotion Practice, 21(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918788578
21.
HowardJ. (2017). Nonstandard work arrangements and worker health and safety. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 60(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22669
22.
IvankovaN. V. (2014). Applying mixed methods in action research. In IvankovaN. V. (Ed.), Mixed methods application in action research: From methods to community action (pp. 50–84). Sage.
23.
KeglerM. C.HoneycuttS.DavisM.DauriaE.BergC.DoveC.GambleA.HawkinsJ. (2015). Policy, systems, and environmental change in the Mississippi Delta: Considerations for evaluation design. Health Education & Behavior, 42(1 Suppl.), 57S–66S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198114568428
24.
KimS. J.BostwickW. (2020). Social vulnerability and racial inequality in COVID-19 deaths in Chicago. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 509–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120929677
25.
KreshpajB.OrellanaC.BurströmB.DavisL.HemmingssonT.JohanssonG.KjellbergK.JonssonJ.WegmanD. H.BodinT.BodinT. (2020). What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 46(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3875
26.
LeL. T.AnthonyB. J.BronheimS. M.HollandC. M.PerryD. F. (2016). A technical assistance model for guiding service and systems change. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 43(3), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9439-2
27.
LeemanJ.SommersJ.VuM.JerniganJ.PayneG.ThompsonD.HeiserC.RosanneF.AmmermanA. (2012). Peer reviewed: An evaluation framework for obesity prevention policy Interventions. Preventing Chronic Disease, 9, Article 110322. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110322
28.
LynR.AyturS.DavisT. A.EylerA. A.EvensonK. R.ChriquiJ. F.CradockA. L.GoinsK. V.LittJ.BrownsonR. C. (2013). Policy, systems, and environmental approaches for obesity prevention: A framework to inform local and state action. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 19(3Suppl. 1), S23–S33. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182841709
29.
MaberyC. E. (2012). Moving beyond test scores: A study on how to improve high performing non-Title I High Schools. UCLA.
30.
MarquardtM. J.LeonardH. S.FreedmanA. M.HillC. C. (2009). Action learning for developing leaders and organizations: Principles, strategies, and cases. American Psychological Association.
31.
McLeroyK. R.BibeauD.StecklerA.GlanzK. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401
32.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
33.
PloughA. L. (2014). Building a culture of health: Challenges for the public health workforce. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 47(5Suppl. 3), S388–S390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.037
ResnickL. (2018). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Routledge.
36.
SchillA. L.ChosewoodL. C. (2013). The NIOSH Total Worker Health™ program: An overview. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(12 Suppl), S8–S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000037.
37.
SocioCultural Research Consultants. (2018). Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (Dedoose Version 8.0.35) [Computer software). LLC. www.dedoose.com
38.
SorensenG.McLellanD.DennerleinJ. T.PronkN. P.AllenJ. D.BodenL. I.OkechukwuC. A.HashimotoD.StoddardA.WagnerG. R. (2013). Integration of health protection and health promotion: Rationale, indicators, and metrics. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(12 Suppl.), S12–S18. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000032
39.
StringerE. T. (2013). Action research. Sage.
40.
TownsendJ. S.SitakerM.RoseJ. M.RohanE. A.GardnerA.MooreA. R. (2019). Capacity building for and implementation of policy, systems, and environmental change: Results from a survey of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program. Population Health Management, 22(4), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2018.0082
41.
TranM.SokasR. K. (2017). The gig economy and contingent work: An occupational health assessment. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59(4), e63–e66. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000977
WeilD. (2014). The fissured workplace. Harvard University Press.
44.
WengerE. C.SnyderW. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.
45.
WolffT.MinklerM.WolfeS. M.BerkowitzB.BowenL.ButterfossF. D.LeeK. S. (2017). Collaborating for equity and justice: Moving beyond collective impact. Nonprofit Quarterly, 9, 42–53.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
