Assessing the Potential Impact of Cigarette Packs Designed for Lesbian,Gay,Bisexual,and Transgender Adults: A Randomized Experiment to Inform U.S. Regulation,2018

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can regulate the introduction of new tobacco products and some changes to existing products. Cigarette packs have been used as a marketing tool to target specific groups and priority populations. Research has shown that sexual and gender minority (SGM) adults are substantially more likely to use tobacco products than their straight and cisgender counterparts. However, research to inform the FDA’s regulatory decisions regarding cigarette packs targeting priority populations is nascent. To fill this gap, we conducted an online experiment in 2018, randomizing U.S. adults who reported current smoking (N = 954, 52% were SGM) to view one of three cigarette packs. A graphic designer developed “Glacier” branded packs with three levels of SGM imagery: (1) no targeting, (2) subtle targeting, and (3) a rainbow “pride edition.” Participants viewed and rated the pack using cognitive, affective, and behavioral measures informed by theory. We used a linear model framework to compare the two SGM-targeted packs with the not targeted version and tested interactions between pack and SGM identity for the dependent variables. We stratified results by SGM status. SGM status was a significant moderator of the relationship between the pack and ratings of appeal, positive affect, feeling shocked, and intent to try with a coupon. Findings from this study revealed that packs designed for SGM populations can disproportionately change cognitive, affective, and behavioral intention responses for SGM smokers. Products entering the market should be assessed by FDA for the appeal of their packs to vulnerable populations.

Keywords

sexual and gender minority marketing smoking tobacco products regulation inequities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balbach

E. D.

Gasior

R. J.

Barbeau

E. M.

(2003). R. J. Reynolds’ targeting of African Americans: 1988-2000. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 822-827.

Bansal-Travers

Hammond

Smith

Cummings

K. M.

(2011). The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40, 674-682. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.021

Beauchamp

D. E.

(1976). Public health as social justice. Inquiry, 13(1), 3-14.

Bhat

Leigh

T. W.

Wardlow

D. L.

(1996). The effect of homosexual imagery in advertising on attitude toward the ad. Journal of Homosexuality, 31, 161-176.

Buchting

F. O.

Emory

K. T.

Scout Kim

Fagan

Vera

L. E.

Emery

(2017). Transgender use of cigarettes, cigars, and e-cigarettes in a national study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 53(1), e1-e7. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.022

Byron

M. J.

Jeong

Abrams

D. B.

Brewer

N. T.

(2018). Public misperception that very low nicotine cigarettes are less carcinogenic. Tobacco Control, 27, 712-714. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054124

Connolly

G. N.

Alpert

H. R.

(2014). Has the tobacco industry evaded the FDA’s ban on “Light” cigarette descriptors? Tobacco Control, 23, 140-145. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050746

Crilly

Moultrie

Clarkson

P. J.

(2004). Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25, 547-577. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001

DiFranza

J. R.

Clark

D. M.

Pollay

R. W.

(2002). Cigarette package design: Opportunities for disease prevention. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 1(2), 97-109. doi:10.1186/1617-9625-1-2-97

10.

Dilley

J. A.

Spigner

Boysun

M. J.

Dent

C. W.

Pizacani

B. A.

(2008). Does tobacco industry marketing excessively impact lesbian, gay and bisexual communities? Tobacco Control, 17, 385-390. doi:10.1136/tc.2007.024216

11.

Drabble

(2000). Alcohol, tobacco, and pharmaceutical industry funding: Considerations for organizations serving lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 11(1), 1-26.

12.

Drabble

Keatley

J. G.

Marcelle

(2006). Media strategies for advancing health in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities. In Shankle

M. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of lesbian, gay, bisexual, & transgender public health: A practitioner’s guide to service (pp. 335-352). New York, NY: Harrington Park Press.

13.

Ehrlich

S. L.

Woodlee

J. W.

(2017). Philip Morris USA Inc. v. FDA. In Top food and drug cases, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.fdli.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Top-Cases-2016-17.pdf

14.

Ford

Moodie

Purves

MacKintosh

A. M.

(2016). Adolescent girls and young adult women’s perceptions of superslims cigarette packaging: A qualitative study. BMJ Open, 6(1), e010102. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010102

15.

Grier

S. A.

Kumanyika

(2010). Targeted marketing and public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 349-369. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103607

16.

Hammond

Doxey

Daniel

Bansal-Travers

(2011). Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 13, 579-588. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr045

17.

Hinds

J. T.

Loukas

Perry

C. L.

(2019). Explaining sexual minority young adult cigarette smoking disparities. Psychology of Addictictive Behaviors, 33, 371-381. doi:10.1037/adb0000465

18.

Jeong

Zhang

Morgan

J. C.

Ross

J. C.

Osman

Boynton

M. H.

. . . Brewer

N. T.

(2018). Similarities and differences in tobacco control research findings from convenience and probability samples. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53, 476-485. doi:10.1093/abm/kay059

19.

Leas

E. C.

Pierce

J. P.

Dimofte

C. V.

Trinidad

D. R.

Strong

D. R.

(2018). Standardised cigarette packaging may reduce the implied safety of Natural American Spirit cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 27, e118-e123. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053940

20.

Lee

J. G.

Averett

P. E.

Blanchflower

Gregory

K. R.

(2018). Qualitative assessment of a context of consumption framework to inform regulation of cigarette pack design in the U.S. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16, 3. doi:10.18332/tid/82925

21.

Lempert

L. K.

Glantz

(2017). Packaging colour research by tobacco companies: The pack as a product characteristic. Tobacco Control, 26, 307-315. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052656

22.

Ling

P. M.

Glantz

S. A.

(2002). Using tobacco-industry marketing research to design more effective tobacco-control campaigns. JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2983-2989. doi:10.1001/jama.287.22.2983

23.

McKee

Stuckler

(2018). Revisiting the corporate and commercial determinants of health. American Journal of Public Health, 108, 1167-1170. doi:10.2105/ajph.2018.304510

24.

McNeill

Gravely

Hitchman

S. C.

Bauld

Hammond

Hartmann-Boyce

(2017). Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD011244. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011244.pub2

25.

Murphy

(2019). Bud Light will sell beer in rainbow bottles for pride month in June. Retrieved from https://people.com/food/bud-light-beer-rainbow-bottles-pride-month/

26.

Oakenfull

(2007). Effects of gay identity, gender and explicitness of advertising imagery on gay responses to advertising. Journal of Homosexuality, 53(4), 49-69.

27.

Schivinski

Dabrowski

(2014). The consumer-based brand equity inventory: Scale construct and validation. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gdk/wpaper/22.html

28.

Smith

E. A.

Offen

Malone

R. E.

(2006). Pictures worth a thousand words: Noncommercial tobacco content in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual press. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 635-649. doi:10.1080/10810730600934492

29.

Smith

E. A.

Thomson

Offen

Malone

R. E.

(2008). “If you know you exist, it’s just marketing poison”: Meanings of tobacco industry targeting in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 996-1003. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.118174

30.

Solomon

M. R.

(2017). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

31.

Stevens

Carlson

L. M.

Hinman

J. M.

(2004). An analysis of tobacco industry marketing to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations: Strategies for mainstream tobacco control and prevention. Health Promotion Practice, 5(3 Suppl.), 129S-134S. doi:10.1177/1524839904264617

32.

Wheldon

C. W.

Kaufman

A. R.

Kasza

K. A.

Moser

R. P.

(2018). Tobacco use among adults by sexual orientation: Findings from the population assessment of tobacco and health study. LGBT Health, 5, 33-44. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2017.0175

33.

Wiles

J. A.

Cornwell

T. B.

(1991). A review of methods utilized in measuring affect, feelings, and emotion in advertising. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 13, 241-275.

34.

Yerger

V. B.

Przewoznik

Malone

R. E.

(2007). Racialized geography, corporate activity, and health disparities: Tobacco industry targeting of inner cities. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 18(4 Suppl.), 10-38. doi:10.1353/hpu.2007.0120

35.

Yong

H. H.

Borland

Cummings

K. M.

Lindblom

E. N.

Bansal-Travers

. . . Partos

T. R.

(2016). US smokers’ beliefs, experiences and perceptions of different cigarette variants before and after the fsptca ban on misleading descriptors such as “Light,” “Mild,” or “Low.” Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 18, 2115-2123. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw107

36.

Zeithaml

V. A.

Berry

L. L.

Parasuraman

(1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB