Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction. The purpose of this review is to compare and contrast the values, purpose, processes, and outcomes of human-centered design (HCD) and community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to address public health issues and to provide recommendations for how HCD can be incorporated into CBPR partnerships and projects. Review Process. By consulting published literature, source materials, and experts on both approaches, a team of researchers completed a three-phased process of synthesizing key similarities and differences between HCD and CBPR and generating recommendations for ways to integrate HCD strategies in CBPR projects. Results. There are five HCD strategies that can be readily incorporated into CBPR projects to improve outcomes: (1) form transdisciplinary teams, (2) center empathy, (3) recruit and work with “extreme users,” (4) rapidly prototype, and (5) create tangible products or services. Conclusions. Integrating HCD in CBPR projects may lead to solutions that potentially have greater reach, are more readily adopted, are more effective, and add innovation to public health services, products, and policies.

Keywords

behavior change community intervention health promotion health research community-based participatory research partnerships/coalitions program planning and evaluation community assessment evaluation design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2008). Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. Retrieved from https://innovations.ahrq.gov/qualitytools/plan-do-study-act-pdsa-cycle

Bazzano

A. N.

Martin

Hicks

Faughnan

Murphy

(2017). Human-centred design in global health: A scoping review of applications and contexts. PLoS One, 12(11), e0186744. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186744

Blumenthal

D. S.

(2011). Is community-based participatory research possible? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40, 386-389. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.011

Brown

Longanecker

(2013). How to design for the gut. Retrieved from http://uxmag.com/articles/how-to-design-for-the-gut

Brown

Martin

(2015). Design for action. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/design-for-action

Brown

Wyatt

(2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12, 29-43. doi:10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29

Christopher

Watts

McCormick

A. K. H. G.

Young

(2008). Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1398-1406. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.125757

Clark

Ventres

(2016). Qualitative methods in community-based participatory research. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 3-4. doi:10.1177/1049732315617445

Durand

M.-A.

Alam

Grande

S. W.

Elwyn

(2016). “Much clearer with pictures”: Using community-based participatory research to design and test a Picture Option Grid for underserved patients with breast cancer. BMJ Open, 6(2), e010008. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010008

10.

Freire

(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Cotinuum Press.

11.

Glasgow

R. E.

Vogt

T. M.

Boles

S. M.

(1999). Evaluating the Public Health Impact of Health Promotion Interventions: The RE-AIM Framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322-1327. Retrieved from http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdfplus/10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322

12.

IDEO. (2013). Stopping hospital infections in their tracks. Retrieved from https://www.ideo.com/case-study/stopping-hospital-infections-in-their-tracks

13.

IDEO.org. (2015). The field guide to human-centered design. Retrieved from http://www.designkit.org/resources/1

14.

Israel

B. A.

Parker

E. A.

Rowe

Salvatore

Minkler

López

. . . Halstead

(2005). Community-based participatory research: Lessons learned from the Centers for Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113, 1463-1471. doi:10.1289/ehp.7675

15.

Israel

B. A.

Schulz

A. J.

Parker

E. A.

Becker

A. B.

(1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.

16.

Kia-Keating

Santacrose

D. E.

Liu

S. R.

Adams

(2017). Using community-based participatory research and human-centered design to address violence-related health disparities among Latino/a youth. Family & Community Health, 40, 160-169. doi10.1097/FCH.0000000000000145

17.

Kolawole

(n.d.). Empathy. Retrieved from http://www.designkit.org/mindsets/4

18.

Lewis

Y. R.

Shain

Quinn

S. C.

Turner

Moore

(2002). Building community trust: Lessons from an STD/HIV peer educator program with African American barbers and beauticians. Health Promotion Practice, 3, 133-143. doi:10.1177/152483990200300209

19.

Lucero

Wallerstein

Duran

Alegria

Greene-Moton

Israel

. . . White Hat

E. R.

(2018). Development of a mixed methods investigation of process and outcomes of community-based participatory research. Article Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12, 55-74. doi:10.1177/1558689816633309

20.

Matheson

G. O.

Pacione

Shultz

R. K.

Klügl

(2015). Leveraging human-centered design in chronic disease prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 48, 472-479. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.014

21.

McCurdie

Taneva

Casselman

Yeung

McDaniel

Cafazzo

(2012). mHealth Consumer Apps : The case for user-centered design. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology, 46(s2), 49-56. doi:10.2345/0899-8205-46.s2.49

22.

McKim

R. H.

(1980). Experiences in visual thinking (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

23.

Minkler

Wallerstein

(2011). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

24.

Nanos

(2016, October 28). Designers bring private -sector ideas to public policy. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2016/10/28/designers-bring-private-sector-ideas-public-policy/oQS7HSvcSmEhUpN9gJ6QqM/story.html

25.

Norman

(2002). Emotion and design: attractive things work better. Interactions, 9(4), 36-42. doi:10.1145/543434.543435

26.

Peterson

J. C.

Gubrium

(2011). Old wine in new bottles? The positioning of participation in 17 NIH-funded CBPR projects. Health Communication, 26, 724-734. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.566828

27.

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2017). How can we design communities where kids and families thrive? Retrieved from https://www.rwjf.org/en/blog/2017/03/how_can_we_designco.html

28.

Rowe

P. G.

(1987). Design thinking. Cambridge: MIT Press.

29.

Salimi

Shahandeh

Malekafzali

Loori

Kheiltash

Jamshidi

. . . Majdzadeh

(2012). Is community-based participatory research (CBPR) useful? A systematic review on papers in a decade. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 3, 386-393.

30.

Salvatore

A. L.

Chevrier

Bradman

Camacho

López

Kavanagh-Baird

. . . Eskenazi

(2009). A community-based participatory worksite intervention to reduce pesticide exposures to farmworkers and their families. American Journal of Public Health, 99, S578-S581. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.149146

31.

Schwab

(2017). Ideo studied innovation in 100+ companies: Here’s what it found. Retrieved from https://www.fastcodesign.com/3069069/ideo-studied-innovation-in-100-companies-heres-what-it-found

32.

Sonney

Duffy

Hoogerheyde

L. X.

Langhauser

Teska

(2018). Applying human-centered design to the development of an asthma essentials kit for school-aged children and their parents. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 33, 169-177. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2018.07.008

33.

SwipeSense

(2017). SwipeSense: How it works. Retrieved from https://www.swipesense.com/#how_it_works

34.

Trickett

E. J.

(2011). Community-based participatory research as worldview or instrumental strategy: Is It Lost in translation(al) research? American Journal of Public Health, 101, 1353-1355. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300124

35.

Ulin

P. R.

Robinson

E. T.

Tolley

E. E.

(2005). Qualitative methods in public health: A field guide for applied research (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

36.

Usability.gov. (2018). User-centered design basics. Retrieved from https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user-centered-design.html

37.

Wallerstein

N. B.

Duran

(2006). Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice, 7, 312-323. doi:10.1177/1524839906289376

38.

Wallerstein

Duran

(2010). Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100(Suppl 1), S40-S46. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036

39.

Wallerstein

N. B.

Yen

I. H.

Syme

S. L.

(2011). Integration of social epidemiology and community-engaged interventions to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 101, 822-830. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.140988

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Enhancing Community-Based Participatory Research Through Human-Centered Design Strategies

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material