The EDIC Method: An Engaging and Comprehensive Approach for Creating Health Department Workforce Development Plans

Abstract

In 2013, the Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services, Division of Public Health (Nebraska’s State Health Department); and the University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health developed a comprehensive approach to assess workforce training needs. This article outlines the method used to assess the education and training needs of Division staff, and develop comprehensive workforce development plans to address those needs. The EDIC method (Engage, Develop, Identify, and Create) includes the following four phases: (1) Engage Stakeholders, (2) Develop Assessment, (3) Identify Training Needs, and (4) Create Development Plans. The EDIC method provided a process grounded in science and practice, allowed input, and produced buy-in from staff at all levels throughout the Division of Public Health. This type of process provides greater assurance that the most important gaps in skills and competencies will be identified. Although it is a comprehensive approach, it can be replicated at the state or local level across the country.

Keywords

partnerships/coalitions,needs/assets assessment program planning and evaluation focus groups surveys workforce development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. (2006). Demonstrating excellence in practice-based research for public health. Retrieved from http://www.aspph.org/educate/models/demonstrating-excellence-in-practice-based-research-for-public-health/

Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. (2014). Profile of state public health (Vol. 3). Retrieved from http://www.astho.org/Profile/

Brownson

R. C.

Fielding

J. E.

Maylahn

C. M.

(2009). Evidence-based public health: A fundamental concept for public health practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 175-201.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Evaluation briefs. Gaining consensus among stakeholder through the nominal group technique. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief7.pdf

Creswell

J. W.

(2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gebbie

Turnock

B. J.

(2006). The public health workforce, 2006: New challenges. Health Affairs, 25, 923-933.

Healthy People 2020. (2015). Topics and objectives index: Healthy people. Retrieved from http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/default.aspx

The Institute of Cultural Affairs in the U.S.A. (n.d.). What is the technology of participation? Retrieved from http://www.ica-usa.org/?page=whatistop

The Institute of Cultural Affairs in the U.S.A. (2000). ToP facilitation methods: Effective methods for participation. Chicago, IL: Author.

10.

Institute of Medicine. (1988). Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health: The future of public health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

11.

Institute of Medicine. (2003). Committee on assuring the health of the public in the 21st century. The future of the public’s health in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

12.

Institute of Medicine. (2007). Training physicians for public health careers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

13.

Public Health Accreditation Board. (2013). Standards and measures (Version 1.5). Retrieved from http://www.phaboard.org/accreditation-process/public-health-department-standards-and-measures/

14.

Public Health Accreditation Board. (2015). Accreditation activity as of September 2015. Retrieved from http://www.phaboard.org/wp-content/uploads/Print-Map-September-2015.pdf

15.

Rosenstock

Silver

G. B.

Helsing

Evashwick

Katz

Klag

. . . Sumaya

(2008). Confronting the public health workforce crisis. Public Health Reports, 123, 395-398.

16.

Stanfield

B. R.

(2015). The art of focused conversation. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society.