Through a critical rhetorical analysis using Bandura’s social cognitive theory as a lens to view The Biggest Loser (TBL), this article illustrates the contradictions between the show’s health promotional aims and its entertainment aims, which show the problems the show creates for health promotion practitioners working on obesity. The social cognitive theory constructs of observational learning, psychological determinants, and environmental determinants emerged from this reading of TBL as central to how the show masquerades as a health promotion tool. This reading reveals that TBL promotes a neoliberal construction of health and obesity that challenges the worldview that many health promotion campaigns take and, therefore, complicates our own efforts to combat obesity. With this revealed, it is suggested that TBL be incorporated into health promotion campaigns only as a foil.
AllisonD. B.BasileV. C.YukerH. E. (1991). The measurement of attitudes and beliefs about obese persons. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 10, 599-607.
2.
AndreasenA. R. (2002). Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 3-13.
3.
Anonymous. (2006). Reader responds to Dr. James Hill’s October Obesity Management Editorial: Advisor to ‘The Biggest Loser’ says show is a winner. Obesity Management, 2(1), 5-7.
4.
Avila-SaavedraG. (2009). Nothing queer about queer television: Televized construction of gay masculinities. Media, Culture & Society, 31, 5-21.
5.
BratichJ. (2006). “Nothing is left alone for too long”: Reality programming and control society subjects. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 30, 65-83.
6.
ButlerS.BissellK. (2013). “The Best I Can Be”: Framing disability through the mascots of the 2012 Summer Olympics and Paralympics. Communication & Sport, 3, 123-141.
7.
CascioC. N.CinS. D.FalkE. B. (2013). Health communication: Predicting behavior change from the brain. In HallP. A. (Ed.), Social neuroscience and public health (pp. 57-71). New York, NY: Springer.
8.
CooperB. (2002). Boys Don’t Cry and female masculinity: Reclaiming a life & dismantling the politics of normative heterosexuality. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19, 44-63.
9.
CramerP.SteinwertT. (1998). Thin is good, fat is bad: How early does it begin?Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 429-451.
10.
CrandallC. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882-894.
11.
DaunceyH. (1996). French “reality television”: More than a matter of taste?European Journal of Communication, 11, 83-106.
12.
DomoffS. E.HinmanN. G.KoballA. M.Storfer-IsserA.CarhartV. L.BaikK. D.CarelsR. A. (2012). The effects of reality television on weight bias: An examination ofThe Biggest Loser. Obesity, 20, 993-998.
13.
GaneshasundaramR.HenleyN. (2009). Reality television (Supernanny): A social marketing “place” strategy. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26, 311-319.
14.
GreenbergB. S.WorrelT. R. (2005). The portrayal of weight in the media and its social impact. In BrownellK. D.PuhlR. M.SchwartzM. B.RuddL. (Eds.), Weight bias: Nature, consequences, and remedies (pp. 42-53). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
16.
HillJ. O. (2005). Is “The Biggest Loser” really a big winner or just a big loser?Obesity Management, 1, 187-188.
17.
KuypersJ. A. (2009). Rhetorcial criticism as art. In KuypersJ. A. (Ed.), Rhetorical criticism: Perspectives in action (pp. 13-28). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
18.
LeBonteR. (1994). Health promotion and empowerment: Reflections on professional practice. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 253-268.
19.
LewisT. (2008). Transforming citizens? Green politics and ethical consumption on lifestyle television. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 22, 227-240.
20.
McAlisterA. L.PerryC. L.ParcelG. S. (2008). How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact: Social Cognitive Theory. In GlanzK.RimerB. K.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 169-188). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
McGeeM. C. (1990). Text, context and the fragmentation of contemporary culture. Western Journal of Communication, 54, 274-289.
22.
McKerrowR. E. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communication Monographs, 56, 91-111.
23.
MinklerM. (1999). Personal responsibility for health? A review of the arguements and the evidence at century’s end. Health Education & Behavior, 26, 121-141.
24.
National Center for Health Statistics. (2013). Health, United States, 2012: With special feature on emergency care. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
25.
OuelletteL.HayJ. (2008). Better living through reality TV: Television and post-welfare citizenship. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
26.
PerseE. M. (2001). Media effects and society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
QuickB. L. (2009). The effects of viewing Grey’s anatomy on perceptions of doctors and patient satisfaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(1), 38-55.
RodmanS. (2004, October15). Bring on the “losers”: New reality show likes ‘em pathetic. Boston Herald, p. E39.
30.
RudmanL. A.FeinbergJ.FairchildK. (2002). Minority members’ implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20, 294-320.
31.
SenderK.SullivanM. (2008). Epidemics of will, failures of self-esteem: Responding to fat bodies in The Biggest Loser and What Not to Wear. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 22, 573-584.
32.
SymeA. L. (2004). Social determinants of health: The community as an empowered partner. Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 1-5.
WangS. S.BrownellK. D.WaddenT. A. (2004). The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals. International Journal of Obesity, 28, 1333-1337.
35.
WarinM. (2011). Foucault’s progeny: Jamie Oliver and the art of governing obesity. Social Theory & Health, 9(1), 24-40.
36.
WiehagenT.CaitoN. M.ThompsonV. S.CaseyC.WeaverN. L.JupkaK.KreuterM. W. (2007). Applying projective techniques to formative research in health communication development. Health Promotion Practice, 8, 164-172.
37.
WongJ. (2001). Here’s looking at you: Reality TV, Big Brother, and Foucault. Canadian Journal of Communication, 26, 489-501.
