Predicting Improvement After a Bystander Program for the Prevention of Sexual and Dating Violence

Abstract

Although evidence suggests that bystander prevention programs are promising interventions for decreasing sexual violence and dating violence on college campuses, there have been no studies to date evaluating moderators of bystander program effectiveness. The current study evaluates whether different demographic characteristics, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors at pretest predict change over a 6-month follow-up for students who participated in a bystander prevention program. Participants in the three assessments (pretest, posttest, 6-month follow-up) included 296 college students who were mandated to attend a bystander program during their first year orientation. Analyses showed that with few exceptions, the bystander program worked best for students who were most at risk given their pretest demographics and levels of attitudes condoning dating violence and sexual violence, bystander efficacy, and bystander behaviors. Results are discussed in terms of suggestions for future research.

Keywords

prevention sexual assault domestic violence partner violence bystander effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali

(2011). Dear colleague letter: Sexual violence. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/dear_colleague_sexual_violence.pdf

Anderson

L. A.

Whiston

S. C.

(2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 374-388.

Banyard

V. L.

Moynihan

M. M.

Plante

E. G.

(2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 463-481.

Banyard

V. L.

Plante

E. G.

Moynihan

M. M.

(2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 61-79.

Banyard

V. L.

Plante

E. G.

Moynihan

M. M.

(2005). Rape prevention through bystander education (Final report to NIJ for Grant 2002-WG-BX-0009). Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/208701.pdf

Bauer

D. J.

Curran

P. J.

(2011). Introduction to multilevel modeling: Course notes. Chapel Hill, NC: Curran-Bauer Analytics.

Caetano

Vaeth

R. A. C.

Ramisetty-Mikler

(2008). Intimate partner violence victim and perpetrator characteristics among couples in the United States. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 507-518.

DeGue

Holt

M. K.

Massetti

G. M.

Matjasko

J. L.

Tharp

A. T.

Valle

L. A.

(2012). Looking ahead toward community-level strategies to prevent sexual violence. Journal of Women’s Health, 21, 1-3.

Fisher

B. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

10.

Forst

L. S.

Lightfoot

J. T.

Burrichter

(1996). Familiarity with sexual assault and its relationship to the effectiveness of acquaintance rape prevention programs. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 12, 28-44.

11.

Foubert

J. D.

(2000). The longitudinal effects of a rape-prevention program on fraternity men’s attitudes, behavioral intent, and behavior. Journal of American College Health, 48, 158-163.

12.

Gidycz

C. A.

Lynn

S. J.

Rich

C. L.

Marioni

N. L.

Loh

Blackwell

L. M.

. . . Fite

(2001). The evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction program: A multisite investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 1073-1078.

13.

Gidycz

C. A.

Orchowski

L. M.

Berkowitz

A. D.

(2011). Preventioning sexual aggression among college men: An evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women, 17, 720-742.

14.

Gidycz

C. A.

Warkentin

J. B.

Orchowski

L. M.

Edwards

K. M.

(2011). College men’s perceived likelihood to perpetrate sexual aggression. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20, 260-279.

15.

Heppner

M. J.

Humphrey

C. F.

Hillenbrand-Gunn

T. L.

Debord

K. A.

(1995). The differential effects of rape prevention programming on attitudes, behavior, and knowledge. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 508-518.

16.

Heppner

M. J.

Neville

H. A.

Smith

Kivlighan

D. M.

Gershuny

B. S.

(1999). Examining immediate and long-term efficacy of rape prevention programming with racially diverse college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 16-26.

17.

Hines

D. A.

(2008). Borderline personality and intimate partner aggression: An international multi-site, cross-gender analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 290-302.

18.

Hines

D. A.

Armstrong

J. L.

Palm Reed

K. M.

Cameron

A. Y.

(2012). Gender differences in sexual assault victimization among college students. Violence and Victims, 27, 922-940.

19.

Hines

D. A.

Saudino

K. J.

(2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence and Victims, 18, 197-218.

20.

Island

Letellier

(1991). Men who beat the men who love them. New York, NY: Harrington Park Press.

21.

Kassing

L. R.

Beesley

Frey

L. L.

(2005). Gender role conflict, homophobia, age, and education as predictors of rape myth acceptance. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27, 311-328.

22.

Katz

(1994). Mentors in Violence Prevention (MVP) trainer’s guide. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.

23.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

Resnick

H. S.

Ruggiero

K. J.

Conoscenti

L. M.

McCauley

(2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf

24.

Lisak

Miller

P. M.

(2002). Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence and Victims, 17, 73-84.

25.

McMahon

(2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59, 3-11.

26.

Melanson

P. K.

(1999). Belief in male rape myths: A test of two competing theories (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

27.

Messer

S. B.

Wampold

B. E.

(2002). Let’s face it: Common factors are more potent than specific therapy ingredients. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 21-25.

28.

Meyers

L. S.

Gamst

Guarino

A. J.

(2013). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Moynihan

M. M.

Banyard

V. L.

Arnold

J. S.

Eckstein

R. P.

Stapleton

J. G.

(2011). Sisterhood may be powerful for reducing sexual and intimate partner violence: An evaluation of the Bringing in the Bystander in-person program with sorority members. Violence Against Women, 17, 703-719. doi: 10.1177/1077801211409726

30.

Palm Reed

K. M.

Hines

D. A.

Armstrong

J. L.

Cameron

A. Y.

(2014). Experimental evaluation of a bystander prevention program for sexual assault and dating violence. Psychology of Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0037557

31.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance (IRMA) Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.

32.

Pinzone-Glover

H. A.

Gidycz

C. A.

Jacobs

C. D.

(1998). An acquaintance rape prevention program: Effects on attitudes toward women, rape-related attitudes, and perceptions of rape scenarios. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 605-621.

33.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

34.

Renzetti

C. M.

(1998). Violence and abuse in lesbian relationships: Theoretical and empirical issues. In Berger

R. K.

(Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 117-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

35.

Sabina

Straus

M. A.

(2008). Polyvictimization by dating partners and mental health among U.S. college students. Violence and Victims, 23, 667-682.

36.

Straus

M. A.

& The International Dating Violence Research Consortium. (2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10, 790-811.

37.

Straus

M. A.

Kantor

G. K.

Moore

D. W.

(1997). Changes in cultural norms approving marital violence from 1968 to 1994. In Kantor

G. K.

Jasinski

J. L.

(Eds.), Out of darkness: Contemporary perspectives on family violence (pp. 3-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

38.

Swift

C. F.

Ryan-Finn

(1995). Perpetrator prevention: Stopping the development of sexually abusive behavior. In Swift

C. F.

(Ed.), Sexual assault and abuse: Sociocultural context of prevention (pp. 13-44). New York, NY: Haworth.

39.

Tyler

K. A.

Hoyt

D. R.

Whitbeck

L. B.

(1998). Coercive sexual strategies. Violence and Victims, 13, 47-61.

40.

Wampold

B. E.

Mondin

G. W.

Moody

Stich

Benson

Ahn

(1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, “all must have prizes.” Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203-215.

41.

Ward

K. J.

(2001). Mentors in violence prevention program evaluation, 1999-2000. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.