Reliability and Validity of the Hands-Up Survey in Assessing Commuting to School in New Zealand Elementary School Children

Abstract

The decrease in physical activity time in and out of school increases the need for active commuting. School travel plan programs have been used internationally to increase active commuting in elementary school children. However, little research has been conducted in the reliability and validity of travel survey instruments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability and validity of the Hands-Up survey to assess active commuting to school from a random sample of children within the Auckland region, New Zealand. Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of travel modes were determined in 118 elementary school children in the Auckland region. The survey tool consisted of one question on commuting to school. Test–retest reliability and validity were evaluated using kappa coefficients. The level of agreement between the children’s responses (κ = .96, 95% confidence interval = 0.92-1.00) and between children’s and parents’ (κ = .91, 95% confidence interval = 0.85-0.98) were almost perfect. The Hands-Up survey is a valid and reliable tool to determine travel mode to school among elementary school children.

Keywords

active commuting active transport elementary Hands-Up survey school travel plan reliability validity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auckland Regional Transport Authority. (2007). Sustainable transport plan 2006-16. Auckland, New Zealand: Author.

Australian Government. (2006). Evaluation of Australian TravelSmart projects in the ACT, South Australia, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia: 2001-2005. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Cooper

A. R.

Page

A. S.

Foster

L. J.

Qahwaji

(2003). Commuting to school: Are children who walk more physically active? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25, 273-276.

Evenson

K. R.

Birnbaum

A. S.

Bedimo-Rung

A. L.

Sallis

J. F.

Voorhees

C. C.

Ring

Elder

J. P.

(2006). Girls’ perception of physical environmental factors and transportation: Reliability and association with physical activity and active transport to school. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 3(1), 28.

Evenson

K. R.

Neelon

Ball

S. C.

Vaughn

Ward

D. S.

(2008). Validity and reliability of a school travel survey. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 5(Suppl. 1), S1-S5.

Faulkner

G. E. J.

Buliung

R. N.

Flora

P. K.

Fusco

(2009). Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: a systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 48(1), 3-8.

Hampshire County Council. (2007). Key elements of a school travel plan, evaluation and monitoring. Retrieved from http://www.hants.gov.uk/schooltravelplans/elements.html

Heelan

K. A.

Donnelly

Jacobsen

Mayo

Washburn

Greene

(2005). Active commuting to and from school and BMI in elementary school children: Preliminary data. Child: Care, Health and Development, 31, 341-349.

Hinckson

E. A.

Garrett

Duncan

(2011). Active commuting to school in New Zealand Children (2004-2008): A quantitative analysis. Preventive Medicine, 52, 332-336.

10.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.

11.

McKee

Mutrie

Crawford

Green

(2007). Promoting walking to school: Results of a quasi-experimental trial. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 818-823.

12.

Mendoza

J. A.

Watson

Baranowski

Nicklas

T. A.

Uscanga

D. K.

Hanfling

M. J.

(2010). Validity of instruments to assess students’ travel and pedestrian safety. BMC Public Health, 10, 257.

13.

Ministry of Education New Zealand. (2008). Review of deciles: General information. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.govtnz/NZEducation/EducationPolicies/Schools/SchoolOperations/Resourcing/OperationalFunding/Deciles/ReviewOfDecilesGeneralInformation.aspx

14.

Roebers

C. M.

Schneider

(2002). Stability and consistency of children’s event recall. Cognitive Development, 17, 1085-1103.

15.

Sallis

J. F.

Buono

M. J.

Roby

J. J.

Micale

F. G.

Nelson

J. A.

(1993). Seven-day recall and other physical activity self-reports in children and adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 25, 99-108.

16.

Staunton

C. E.

Hubsmith

Kallins

(2003). Promoting safe walking and biking to school: The Marin County success story. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1431-1434.

17.

Stopher

Zhang

Halling

(2009). Results of an evaluation of TravelSmart in South Australia. Paper presented at the 32nd Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF). Retrieved from http://www.patrec.org/web_docs/atrf/papers/2009/1783_paper111-Stopher.pdf

18.

Telford

Salmon

Jolley

Crawford

(2004). Reliability and validity of physical activity questionnaires for children: The children’s leisure activities study survey (CLASS). Pediatric Exercise Science, 16, 64-78.