A pedestrian plan is a public document that explains a community’s vision and goals for future pedestrian activity. This study explored whether involvement by public health professionals in the development of pedestrian plans was associated with certain characteristics of the plan (vision, goals, identified programs, and evaluation). This study identified, collected, and analyzed content of all pedestrian plans in North Carolina through 2008. Among the 46 plans, 39% reported involvement by public health professionals in their development. Overall, 72% of pedestrian plans included a vision statement; health was mentioned four times and quality of life was mentioned five times. Slightly more than half (52%) of the plans included goals to improve public health. Plans that involved public health professionals more often included the type of physical activity, safety, or education program. Only 22% of all pedestrian plans included a proposal to evaluate their implementation. Plans that included public health professionals were less likely to include an evaluation proposal (11%) compared with those that did not involve public health professionals (21%). Public health professionals are encouraged to seek involvement in the pedestrian planning process, particularly in the areas of health program development, implementation, and evaluation.
AyturS.EvensonK.RodriguezD.SalvesenD.SatinskyS. (2008). NCPAPRC (North Carolina Physical Activity Policy Research Center) Pedestrian Plan Coding Tool. Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/~kevenson/_PedPlanCodingProtocol.pdf
2.
BerkeP. (2002). Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature, 17, 21-36.
3.
BerkeP.GodschalkD.KaiserE.RodriguezD. (2006). Urban land use planning (5th ed.). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
4.
BerkeP.Manta ConroyM. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 21-36.
5.
BorsP.DessauerM.BellR.WilkersonR.LeeJ.StrunkS. (2009). The Active Living by Design national program: Community initiatives and lessons learned. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(6Suppl. 2), S313-S321.
6.
BrodyS. (2003a). Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazardsJournal of Planning Education and Research, 23, 191-201.
7.
BrodyS. (2003b). Implementing the principles of ecosystem management through local land use planning. Population and Environment, 29, 511-540.
8.
BurbyR.DaltonL. (1994). Plans can matter! The role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting development of hazardous areas. Public Administration Review, 54, 230-238.
9.
CalthorpeP. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Prevalence of self-reported physically active adults—United States, 2007. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57, 1297-1300.
12.
CorburnJ. (2004). Confronting the challenges in reconnecting urban planning and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 541-546.
13.
CorburnJ.BhatiaR. (2007). Health impact assessment in San Francisco: Incorporating the social determinants of health into environmental planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, 323-341.
14.
DavidoffP. (1996). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. In CampbellS.FainsteinS. S. (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 210-223). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
15.
EvansR.StoddartG. (2003). Consuming research, producing policy?American Journal of Public Health, 93, 371-379.
FerreiraI.van der HorstK.Wendel-VosW.KremersS.van LentheF.BrugJ. (2007). Environmental correlates of physical activity in youth—a review and update. Obesity Reviews, 8, 129-154.
18.
FespermanC.EvensonK.RodriguezD.SalvesenD. (2008). A comparative case study on active transport to and from school. Preventing Chronic Disease, 5(2), A40. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/apr/2007_0064.htm
19.
GielenA.McDonaldE.BoneL.GaryInT. (2008). Using the PRECEDE-PROCEED model to apply health behavior theories. In GlanzK.RimerB.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 407-433). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
HandyS.McCannB.BaileyL.ErnstM.McReeL.MehargE.. . . WrightK. (2009). The regional response to federal funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects (Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-09-15). Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California. Retrieved from http://pubs.its.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=1304
21.
HealyP. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23, 217-234.
22.
HeathG. W.BrownsonR. C.KrugerJ.MilesR.PowellK. E.RamseyL. T., & Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2006). The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: A systematic review. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 3(Suppl. 1), S55-S76.
23.
HoehnerC.BrennanL.BrownsonR.HandyS.KillingsworthR. (2003). Opportunities for integrating public health and urban planning approaches to promote active community environments. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18, 14-20.
24.
JilcottS.AmmermanA.SommersJ.GlasgowR. (2007). Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 105-114.
25.
KahnE.RamseyL.BrownsonR.HeathG.HowzeE.PowellK.. . . CorsoP. (2002). The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(4 Suppl.), 73-107.
26.
KrumholzN. (1982). A retrospective view of equity planning, Cleveland 1969-1979. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48, 163-174.
27.
LeeC.Vernez MoudonA. (2004). Physical activity and environment research in the health field: Implications for urban and transportation planning and research. Journal of Planning Literature, 19, 147-181.
28.
MaliziaE. E. (2005). City and regional planning: A primer for public health officials. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19(5 Suppl.), 1-13.
29.
McLeroyK.BibeauD.StecklerA.GlanzK. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351-377.
30.
NelsonA.DawkinsC. (2004). Urban containment in the United States: History, models, and techniques for regional and metropolitan growth management (Planning Advisory Service Rep. No. 520). Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
North Carolina Department of Transportation, & Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation. (2008). North Carolina Department of Transportation Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Grant Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.ncdot.org/bikeped/planning/
34.
NortonR. (2005). More and better local planning: State-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71, 55-71.
Prevention Institute. (2008). Strategies for enhancing the built environment to support healthy eating and active living. Oakland, CA: Healthy Eating Active Living Convergence Partnership.
37.
PucherJ.DillJ.HandyS. (2010). Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine, 50(Suppl. 1), S106-S125.
SaelensB.SallisJ.FrankL. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annala of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 80-91.
40.
SallisJ. (2009). Measuring physical activity environments: A brief history. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4 Suppl.), S86-S92.
41.
SanchezT.WolfJ. (2005). Environmental justice and transportation equity: A review of metropolitan planning organizations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
42.
SchmidT.PrattM.WitmerL. (2006). A framework for physical activity policy research. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 3(Suppl. 1), S20-S29.
43.
TesterJ. M. (2009). The built environment: designing communities to promote physical activity in children. Pediatrics, 123, 1591-1598.
44.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2008). 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans (ODPHP Publication No. U0036). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/
45.
Wendel-VosW.DroomersM.KremersS.BrugJ.van LentheF. (2007). Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 8, 425-440.
46.
WingS.BarnettE.CasperM.TyrolerH. (1992). Geographic and socioeconomic variation in the onset of decline of coronary heart disease mortality in white women. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 204-209.
