Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Half of Americans older than age 50 are not current with recommended screening; research is needed to assess the impact of interventions designed to increase receipt of CRC screening. The Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care (C-TRIP) study is a theoretically informed group randomized trial within 32 primary care practices. Baselinemedian proportion of active patients aged 50 years or older up-to-date with CRC screening among the 32 practices was 50.8% (N = 55,746). Men were more likely to have been screened than women (52.9% vs. 49.2%, respectively). Patients 50 to 59 years of age were less likely to be up-to-date with screening (45.4%) than those in the 60 to 69 years and 70 to 79 years groups (58.5% in both groups). Opportunities exist to increase the proportion of CRC screening received in adults aged 50 and older. C-TRIP evaluates the effectiveness of a model for improvement for increasing this proportion.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2006a, August 9). A call to action: Prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer. Atlanta, GA: Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Retrieved August 1, 2007 , from http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/publications/slide_sets.htm
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2006b). Increased Use of Colorectal Cancer Tests: United States, 2002 and 2004. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55(11), 308-311.
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2007). Notice to readers: National colorectal cancer awareness month: March 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56(10), 227-228. Retrieved July 31, 2007, from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5610a6.htm
4.
Cokkinides, V.E., Chao, A., Smith, R.A., Vernon, S.W., & Thun, M.J. ( 2003). Correlates of underutilization of colorectal cancer screening among U.S. adults, age 50 years and older. Preventive Medicine , 36, 85-91.
5.
DeWilde, L.F., & Russell, C. ( 2004). The "Welcome to Medicare" physical: A great opportunity for our seniors. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 54, 292-294.
6.
Farraye, F.A., Wong, M., Hurwitz, S., Puleo, E., Emmons, K., Wallace, M.B., et al. (2004). Barriers to endoscopic colorectal cancer screening: Are women different from men? American Journal of Gastroenterology, 99, 341-349.
7.
Feifer, C., & Ornstein, S.M. (2004). Strategies for increasing adherence to clinical guidelines and improving patient outcomes in small primary care practices. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety , 30, 432-441.
8.
Feifer, C., Ornstein, S.M., Jenkins, R.G., Wessell, A.M., Corley, S.T., Nemeth, L.S., et al. (2006). The logic behind a multimethod intervention to improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines in a nationwide network of primary care practices. Evaluation & the Health Professions , 29, 65-88.
9.
Friedemann-Sanchez, G., Griffin, J.M., & Partin, M.R. ( 2007). Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs. Health Expectations, 10, 148-160.
10.
Gilbert, A., & Kanarek, N. ( 2005). Colorectal cancer screening: Physician recommendation is influential advice to Marylanders. Preventive Medicine , 41, 367-379.
11.
Grimshaw, J.M., Thomas, R.E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C.R., Vale, L., et al. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment, 8(6). Retrieved January 25, 2009, from http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon806.pdf
12.
Gross, C.P., Andersen, M.S., Krumholz, H.M., McAvay, G.J., Proctor, D., & Tinetti, M.E. ( 2006). Relation between Medicare screening reimbursement and stage at diagnosis for older patients with colon cancer. Journal of American Medical Association, 296, 2815-2822.
13.
Grufferman, S. ( 1999). Complexity and the Hawthorne effect in community trials . Epidemiology, 10, 209-210.
14.
Hing, E.S., Burt, C.W., & Woodwell, D.A. (2007). Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006. Advance Data, 393, 1-7.
15.
Ioannou, G.N., Chapko, M.K., & Dominitz, J.A. (2003). Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 98, 2082-2091.
16.
Kiefe, C.I., Allison, J.J., Williams, O.D., Person, S.D., Weaver, M.T., & Weissman, N.W. (2001). Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of American Medical Association, 285, 2871-2879.
17.
Kiefe, C.I., Weissman, N.W., Allison, J.J., Farmer, R., Weaver, M., & Williams, O.D. (1998). Identifying achievable benchmarks of care: Concepts and methodology. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 10, 443-447.
18.
Klabunde, C.N., Lanier, D., Breslau, E.N., Zapka, J.G., Fletcher, R.H., Ransahoff, D.H., et al. (2007). Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care: Innovative strategies and future directions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1195-1205.
19.
Klabunde, C.N., Meissner, H.I., Wooten, K.G., Breen, N., & Singleton, J.A. (2007). Comparing colorectal cancer screening and immunization status in older Americans. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, 1-8.
20.
Levin, B., Lieberman, D.A., McFarland, B., Smith, R.A., Brooks, D., Andrews, K.S., et al. (2008). Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. Retrieved January 25, 2009, from http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/content/abstract/CA.2007.0018v1
21.
Meissner, H.I., Breen, N., Klabunde, C.N., & Vernon, S.W. ( 2006). Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 15, 389-394.
22.
Miller, W.L., Crabtree, B.F., McDaniel, R., & Stange, K.C. ( 1998). Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory. Journal of Family Practice, 46, 369-376.
23.
Nemeth, L.S., Feifer, C., Stuart, G.W., & Ornstein, S.M. (2008). Implementing change in primary care practices using electronic medical records: A conceptual framework . Implementation Science, 3(3). Retrieved January 25, 2009, from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2254645
24.
Nemeth, L.S., Nietert, P.J., & Ornstein, S.M. (2009). High performance in screening for colorectal cancer: A Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) case study . Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 22, 141-146.
25.
Nemeth, L.S., Wessell, A.M., Jenkins, R.G., Nietert, P.J., Liszka, H.A., & Ornstein, S.M. (2007). Strategies to accelerate translation of research into primary care within practices using electronic medical records. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 22(4), 343-349.
26.
Nietert, P.J., Wessell, A.M., Jenkins, R.G., Feifer, C., Nemeth, L.S., & Ornstein, S.M. (2007). Using a summary measure for multiple quality indicators in primary care: The Summary QUality InDex (SQUID). Implementation Science, 2(11). Retrieved January 25, 2009, from http://www.implementationscience.com/content/2/1/11
27.
Ornstein, S., Jenkins, R.G., Nietert, P.J., Feifer, C., Roylance, L.F., Nemeth, L., et al. (2004). A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: A cluster randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141, 523-532.
28.
Ornstein, S.M., Nietert, P.J., Jenkins, R.G., Wessell, A.M., Nemeth, L.S., Feifer, C., et al. (2007). Improving diabetes care through a multi-component quality improvement model in a practice-based research network. American Journal of Medical Quality, 22, 34-41.
29.
Ornstein, S.M., Nietert, P.J., Jenkins, R.G., Wessell, A.M., Nemeth, L.S., Roylance, L.F., et al. (2008). Improving the translation of research into primary care practice: Results of a national quality improvement demonstration project. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety , 34, 379-390.
30.
Pignone, M., Saha, S., Hoerger, T., & Mandelblatt, J. (2002). Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 137, 96-104.
31.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2000). Healthy people 2010. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2007, September 11). Colon cancer screening (Colorectal). Preventive Service. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.medicare.gov/health/coloncancer.asp
33.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2008 ). Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine , 149. Retrieved January 25, 2009 , from http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/0000605-200811040-00243v1
34.
Weissman, N.W., Allison, J.J., Kiefe, C.I., Farmer, R.M., Weaver, M.T., Williams, O.D., et al. (1999). Achievable benchmarks of care: The ABCs of benchmarking. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice , 5, 269-281.
35.
Wessell, A.M., Liszka, H.A., Nietert, P.J., Jenkins, R.G., Nemeth, L.S., & Ornstein, S. ( 2008). Achievable benchmarks of care for primary care quality indicators in a practice-based research network. American Journal of Medical Quality, 23, 39-46.
