Developing Methods to Compare Low-Education Community-Based and University-Based Survey Teams

Abstract

We compared the quality of low-education community-based survey teams to college educated graduate students. Our approach was to develop methods, conduct a pilot survey, and report lessons. Community and university teams conducted surveys from non-overlapping random samples of addresses at a public housing development in Boston, Massachusetts. The two types of teams make a similar number of attempts (122 and 124, respectively), and there was no statistically significant difference between the teams in terms of response rate or amount of missing data. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in refusal rate or in responses to questions in the survey. There was, however, evidence that the community teams used data tracking forms improperly. This study suggests that it is possible to study the relative quality of community and university-based teams in terms of data collection. The findings also suggest that the two types of teams may be roughly comparable.

Keywords

community-based participatory research survey methods public housing students call for more research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arcury, T.A. , Quandt, S.A. , & Dearry, A. ( 2001). Farmworker. Pesticide exposure and community-based participatory research: rationale and practical applications. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Suppl. 3):429-434.

Badger, T.G. ( 2000). Action research, change and methodological rigour. Journal of Nursing Management, 8, 201-207.

Brown, P. ( 1992). Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: Lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of health and Social Behavior, 33, 267-281.

Brugge, D., & Hynes, P. (Eds.). (2005). Community research in environmental health: Lessons in science, advocacy and ethics. Aldershot , UK: Ashgate.

Brugge, D. , Melly, S. , Finkelman, A. , Russell, M. , Bradeen, L. , Perez, R. , et al. (2003). A community-based participatory survey of public housing conditions and associations between renovations and possible building-related symptoms. Applied Environmental Science & Public Health, 1, 89-101.

Cargo, M. , & Mercer, S.L. (in press). The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health. (Online in advance of print publication: doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824)

Fish, S. ( 2004, May 21). Why we built the ivory tower. The New York Times, p. 23.

Gorman, D.M. ( 2008). Prevention programs and scientific nonsense. Policy Review, 117, 65-75.

Hynes, H.P. , Brugge, D. , Osgood, N. , Snell, J. , Vallarino, J. , & Spengler, J. ( 2003). "Where does the damp come from?" Investigations into the indoor environment and respiratory health in Boston public housing. Journal of Public Health Policy, 24, 401-426.

10.

Israel, B.A. , Eng, E. , Schulz, A.J. , & Parker, E.A. ( 2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .

11.

Jordan, C. , Lee, P. , & Shapiro, E. ( 2000). Measuring developmental outcomes of lead exposure in an urban neighborhood: The challenges of community-based research. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 10(6 Pt 2):732-742, 2000.

12.

Levy, J.I. , Brugge, D. , Peters, J.L. , Clougherty, J.E. , & Saddler, S. ( 2006). A community-based participatory research study of the efficacy of multifaceted in-home environmental interventions for pediatric asthmatics in public housing. Social Science & Medicine , 63, 2191-2203.

13.

Minkler, M. , & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

14.

Myrick, R. , Lemelle, A. , Aoki, B. , Truax, S. , & Lemp, G. ( 2005). Best practices for community collaborative research. AIDS Education & Prevention, 17(4), 400-404.

15.

Nyden, P. ( 2003). Academic incentives for faculty participation in community-based participatory research. Journal of General Internal Medicine , 18, 576-585.

16.

Parry, O. , Gnich, W. , & Platt, S. ( 2001). Principles in practice: Reflections on a "postpositivist" approach to evaluation research. Health Education Research , 16, 215-226.

17.

Schulz, A.J. , Zenk, S.N. , Kannan, S. , Israel, B.A. , Koch, M.A. , & Stokes, C.A. ( 2005). CBPR approach to survey design and implementation: The healthy environments partnership survey. In B. A. Israel , E. Eng , A. J. Schulz , & E. A. Parker. (Eds.), Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

18.

Trickett, E.J. , & Espino, S.L.R. (2004). Collaboration and social inquiry: Multiple meanings of a construct and its role in creating useful and valid knowledge. American Journal of Community Psychology , 34, 1-69.

19.

Viswanathan, M. , Ammerman, A. , Eng, E. , Gartlehner, G. , Lohr, K.N. , Griffith, D. , et al. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99 (Prepared by RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02- 0016; AHRQ Publication 04-E022-1). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality .