Effective Communication During an Influenza Pandemic: The Value of Using a Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Framework

Abstract

During a crisis, an open and empathetic style of communication that engenders the public's trust is the most effective when officials are attempting to galvanize the population to take a positive action or refrain from a harmful act. Although trust is imperative in a crisis, public suspicions of scientific experts and government are increasing for a variety of reasons, including access to more sources of conflicting information, a reduction in the use of scientific reasoning in decision making, and political infighting. Trust and credibility—which are demonstrated through empathy and caring, competence and expertise, honesty and openness, and dedication and commitment—are essential elements of persuasive communication.

Keywords

crisis communication crisis and emergency risk communication public health trust

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brashers, D.E.

(2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communications, 51(3), 477-497.

Brehm, S.S.

Kassin, S.

, &

Fein, S.

(2005). Social psychology (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin .

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

( 2004). Pandemic: A worldwide outbreak of influenza. Retrieved August 26, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/gen-

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

( 2007). Interim pre-pandemic planning guidance: Community strategy for pandemic influence mitigation in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Author.

Fisher, H.W.

(1998). Response to disaster. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Hecht, T.D.

Allen, N.J.

Klammer, J.D.

, &

Kelly, E.C.

(2002). Group beliefs, ability, and performance: The potency of group potency. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice , 6(2), 143-152.

Hill, D.

(2003). Why they buy. Across the Board , 40(6), 27-33.

Mitroff, I.I.

(2004). Crisis leadership: Planning for the unthinkable . Brookfield, CT: Rothstein.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

(2005 ). Emergency planning: National response plan. Retrieved August 16, 2005, from http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0566.xml

10.

Novac, A.

(2001). Traumatic stress and human behavior. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from http://www.mhsource.com

11.

Peters, R.G.

Covello, V.T.

, &

McCallum, D.B.

(1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17(1), 43-54.

12.

Quinn, S.

Thomas, T.

, &

McAllister, C.

(2005). Postal workers' perspectives on communication during the 2001 Anthrax attack. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice and Science, 3(3), 207-215.

13.

Reynolds, B.

(2006). Crisis and emergency risk communication: Pandemic Influenza. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

14.

Reynolds, B.

Galdo, J.

, &

Sokler, L.

(2002). Crisis and emergency risk communication. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .

15.

Reynolds, B.

, &

Seeger, M.

(2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43-55.

16.

Sandman, P.

(2002). Crisis Communication. Retrieved June 12, 2003, from www.psandman.com.

17.

Seeger, M.W.

Sellnow, T.L.

, &

Ulmer, R.R.

(2003). Communication and organizational crisis. Westport, CT: Praeger.

18.

World Health Organization.

(June 19, 2008). Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A/(H5N1) reported to WHO. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/country/cases_table_2008_06_19/en/index.html

19.

Wray, R.

, &

Jupka, K.

(2004). What does the public want to know in the event of a terrorist attack using plague? Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 2(3), 208-215.