Understanding the Data-Action Cycle of Surveillance: A Qualitative Study of Federal and State Stakeholders

Abstract

This qualitative study aims to understand how personnel in state and federal agencies view surveillance systems and the extent to which systematically collected data inform nutrition and physical activity policies and interventions addressing obesity. In-depth interviews were conducted with 17 respondents purposively sampled from state health departments, federal public health agencies, and prevention research centers. All informants acknowledged the importance of surveillance systems and influence of the data-action cycle for monitoring trends and increasing obesity awareness. However, state-level respondents believed surveillance systems should be designed for programmatic purposes, whereas federal participants thought they should be designed for monitoring. Respondents held differing opinions about the flexibility, timeliness, accessibility, and usefulness of existing national surveillance systems, highlighting significant differences in state and federal agencies’ perceptions and utilization of surveillance systems. Such discrepancies call for increased communication surrounding purposes and uses of surveillance data, enabling stronger partnerships between state and federal agencies.

Keywords

nutritional surveillance physical activity obesity qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berwick, D.M. , Godfrey, A.B. , & Roessner, J. ( 1990). Curing health care: New strategies for quality improvement. A report on the National Demonstration Project on Quality Improvement in Health Care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .

Briefel, R. ( 1996). Nutrition monitoring in the United States. In E. E. Ziegler & L. J. Filer (Eds.), Present knowledge in nutrition (7th ed., pp. 517-529). Washington, DC: International Life Sciences Institute Press.

Bowling, A. ( 1997). Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 1988). Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 37(S-5), 1-18.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2000a). Healthy People 2010-Conference edition. Atlanta, GA: Author.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2000b). Updated guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems: Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. Atlanta, GA: Author.

Greene, L.W. , & Mercer, S.L. ( 2001). Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1926-1929.

Habicht, J.P. , & Pelletier, D.L. (1990). The importance of context in choosing nutritional indicators. Journal of Nutrition, 120, 1519-1524.

Israel, B.A. , Cummings, K.M. , Dignan, M.B. , Heaney, C.A. , Perales, D.P. , Simmons-Morton, B.G. , et al. (1995). Evaluation of health education programs: Current assessment and future directions. Health Education Quarterly, 22, 364-389.

10.

Israel, B.A. , Schultz, A.J. , Parker, E.A. , & Becker, A.B. ( 1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.

11.

Kuzel, A.J. , Engel, J.D. , Addison, R.B. , & Bogdewic, S.P. (1994). Desirable features of qualitative research. Family Practice Research Journal, 14, 369-378.

12.

Maxwell, J.A. ( 1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

McManus, R. ( 2002). Zerhouni plots "Roadmap for Action" for NIH future. NIH Record. Retrieved May, 19, 2005, from http://www.nih.gov/news/NIH-Record/09_17_2002/main.htm

14.

Peterson, K.E. , & Chen, L.C. ( 1990). Defining undernutrition for public health purposes in the United States. Journal of Nutrition, 120, 933-942.

15.

Peterson, K.E. , Lindsay, A.C. , & Hatoum, I. ( 2004). Toward comprehensive nutrition and physical activity surveillance. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

16.

Pope, C. , & Mays, N. ( 1995). Reaching the parts that other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research . British Medical Journal, 311, 42-45.

17.

United Nations Administrative Committee on Coordination/ Sub-Committee on Nutrition. (1989). Suggested approaches for nutritional surveillance for the Interagency Food and Nutrition Surveillance Program. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 11, 62-73.

18.

Visscher, T.L. , & Seidell, J.C. ( 2001). The public health impact of obesity. Annual Review of Public Health, 22, 355-375.

19.

Zerhouni, E. ( 2003). The NIH roadmap. Science, 302, 63-64, 72.