Health promotion professionals are increasingly encouraged to implement evidence-based programs in health departments, communities, and schools. Yet translating evidence-based research into practice is challenging, especially for complex initiatives that emphasize environmental strategies to create community change. The purpose of this article is to provide health promotion practitioners with a method to evaluate the community change process and document successful applications of environmental strategies. The community change chronicle method uses a five-step process: first, develop a logic model; second, select outcomes of interest; third, review programmatic data for these outcomes; fourth, collect and analyze relevant materials; and, fifth, disseminate stories. From 2001 to 2003, the authors validated the use of a youth empowerment model and developed eight community change chronicles that documented the creation of tobacco-free schools policies (n = 2), voluntary policies to reduce secondhand smoke in youth hangouts (n = 3), and policy and program changes in diverse communities (n = 3).
Blankenship, K.M., Bray, S.J., & Merson, M.H. (2000). Structural interventions in public health. AIDS, 14(Suppl. 1), S11-S21.
2.
Brinkerhoff, R.O. (2003). The success case method: Find out quickly what's working and what's not. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
3.
Brownson, R.C., Koffman, D.M., Novotny, T.E., Hughes, R.G., & Eriksen, M.P. (1995). Environmental and policy interventions to control tobacco use and prevent cardiovascular disease. Health Education Quarterly, 22(4), 478-498.
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 1999). Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs-August 1999. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2000). Strategies for reducing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, increasing tobacco-use cessation, and reducing initiation in communities and health-care systems. A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 49(RR-12), 1-11.
6.
Dart, J., & Davies, R. (2003). A dialogical, story-based evaluation tool: The most significant change technique. American Journal of Evaluation , 24(2), 137-155.
7.
Fisher, E.B., Brownson, C.A., O'Toole, M.L., Shetty, G., Anwuri, V.V., & Glasgow, R.E. (2005). Ecological approaches to self-management: The case of diabetes. American Journal of Public Health, 95(9), 1523-1535.
8.
French, S.A., Story, M., Fulkerson, J.A., & Hannan, P. (2004). An environmental intervention to promote lower-fat food choices in secondary schools: Outcomes of the TACOS Study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1507-1512.
9.
Gauvin, L., Levesque, L., & Richard, L. (2001). Helping people initiate and maintain a more active lifestyle. A public health framework for physical activity promotion research . In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 718-739). New York: John Wiley.
10.
Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., & Lewis, F.M. (2002). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Glasgow, R.E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A.C. (2003). Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition . American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1261-1267.
12.
Holder, H.D. (2001). Prevention of alcohol problems in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. American Journal on Addictions , 10(1), 1-15.
13.
Huston, S.L., Evenson, K.R., Bors, P., & Gizlice, Z. (2003). Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population . American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 58-69.
14.
Kreuter, M.W., Lezin, N.A., & Young, L.A. (2000). Evaluating community-based collaborative mechanisms: Implications for practitioners. Health Promotion Practice , 1(1), 49-63.
15.
Latkin, C.A., & Knowlton, A.R. (2005). Micro-social structural approaches to HIV prevention: A social ecological perspective. AIDS Care, 17(Suppl. 1), S102-S113.
16.
Mankowski, E.S., & Rappaport, J. (2000). Narrative concepts and analysis in spiritually-based communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(5), 479-493.
17.
McClintock, C. (2003/2004). Using narrative methods to link program evaluation and organization development. The Evaluation Exchange, 9(4). Retrieved September 11, 2007, from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/eval/issue24/pp3.html
18.
Merzel, C., & D'Afflitti, J. (2003). Reconsidering community-based health promotion: Promise, performance, and potential. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 557-574.
19.
National Cancer Institute. (2005). ASSIST: Shaping the future of tobacco prevention and control: Tobacco Control Monograph No. 16 (NIH Publication No. 05-5645). Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.
20.
Nelson, T.F., Naimi, T.S., Brewer, R.D., & Wechsler, H. (2005). The state sets the rate: The relationship among state-specific college binge drinking, state binge drinking rates, and selected state alcohol control policies. American Journal of Public Health, 95(3), 441-446.
21.
North Carolina Tobacco Prevention and Control Branch. (2001). ?Y guide to youth empowerment for tobacco control . Available at http://www.questionwhy.org
22.
Peto, R., & Lopez, A. (2001). Future worldwide health effects of current smoking patterns. In C. E. Koop, C. E. Pearson, & M. R. Schwartz (Eds.), Critical issues in global health (pp. 154-161). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Plotnikoff, R.C., Prodaniuk, T.R., Fein, A.J., & Milton, L. (2005). Development of an ecological assessment tool for a workplace physical activity program standard. Health Promotion Practice, 6(4), 453-463.
24.
Preskill, H., & Coghlan, A. T. (Eds.). (2003). Using appreciative inquiry in evaluation: New Directions in Evaluation No. 100. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology , 23(5), 795-807.
26.
Riley, T., & Hawe, P. (2005). Researching practice: The methodological case for narrative inquiry. Health Education Research, 20(2), 226-236.
27.
Rimer, B.K., Glanz, K., & Rasband, G. (2001). Searching for evidence about health education and health behavior interventions. Health Education and Behavior , 28, 231-248.
28.
Roe, K.M., & Lancaster, B. (2005). Mind the gap! Insight from the first 5 years of the circle of research and practice. Health Promotion Practice , 6, 129-133.
29.
Speller, V., Learmonth, A., & Harrison, D. (1997). The search for evidence of effective health promotion . British Medical Journal, 315, 361-363.
30.
Starr, G., Rogers, T., Schooley, M., Porter, S., Wiesen, E., & Jamison, N. (2005). Key outcome indicators for evaluating comprehensive tobacco control programs. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
31.
Stillman, F.A., Hartman, A.M., Graubard, B.I., Gilpin, E.A., Murray, D.M., & Gibson, J.T. (2003). Evaluation of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST): A report of outcomes. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 95(22), 1681-1691.
32.
Stokols, D. (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(4), 282-298.
33.
Task Force on Community Preventive Services. ( 2001). Recommendations regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(2), 10-15.
34.
Zapka, J., Goins, K.V., Pbert, L., & Ockene, J.K. (2004). Translating efficacy research to effectiveness studies in practice: Lessons from research to promote smoking cessation in community health centers. Health Promotion Practice, 5(3), 245-255.
