Community—Academia Partnerships to Promote Nutrition in the Lower Mississippi Delta: Community Members' Perceptions of Effectiveness,Barriers,and Factors Related to Success

Abstract

This study examined the perceptions of community members' engaged in community—academia partnerships involved in developing nutrition interventions in three communities in the Lower Mississippi Delta. Perceptions on effectiveness of the partnerships were investigated. Six focus group interviews were conducted, with 33 participants that included 27 females and 6 males. The data were analyzed by content coding. Emerging themes were identified and related to accomplishments, barriers to success, and factors related to success of the partnerships. Accomplishments included the establishment of active committees, positive changes in health behavior related to food choices, and participation in community events. Barriers to success included the slow pace of intervention implementation, difficulties with understanding the role of the community in the participatory research process, the decision-making processes, and project name recognition. Factors related to success were tangible benefits to the community, participation that was representative, simplification of the research process, and the decision-making processes.

Keywords

community—academia partnerships community-based participatory research nutrition interventions rural

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arcury, T.A. , Quandt, S.A. , & Dearry, A. (2001). Farmworker pesticide exposure and community-based participatory research: rationale and practical applications. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Suppl. 3), 429-434.

Brodsky, A.E. , & Marx, C.M. (2001). Layers of identity: Multiple psychological senses of community within a community setting. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 161-178.

Brown-Peterside, P. , & Laraque, D. (1997). A community research model: A challenge to public health. American Journal of Public Health, 87(9), 1563-1564.

Butterfoss, F.D. , Goodman, R.M. , & Wandersman, A. (1996). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Education Quarterly, 23(1), 65-79.

Eisinger, A. , & Senturia, K. (2001). Doing community-driven research: A description of Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(3), 519-534.

Eng, E. , & Parker, E. (1994). Measuring community competence in the Mississippi Delta: The interface between program evaluation and empowerment. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 199-220.

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York: Continuum.

Haglund, B. , Weisbrod, R.R. , & Bracht, N. (1990). Assessing the community, its services, needs, leadership, and readiness. In N. Bracht (Ed.), Health promotion at the community level (pp. 91-108). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Israel, B.A. , Schulz, A.J. , Parker, E.A. , & Becker, A.B. (1998). Review of community based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.

10.

Israel, B.A. , Schulz, A.J. , Parker, E.A. , Becker, A.B. , Allen, A.J., III , & Guzman, J.R. (2003). Critical issues in developing and following community based participatory research principles. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 53-76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Join Together. (1993). Community leaders speak out against substance abuse: 1993 report to the nation. Boston: Boston University School of Public Health.

12.

Kone, A. , Sullivan, M. , Senturia, K. , Chrisman, N.J. , Criske, S.J. , & Krieger, J.W. (2000). Improving collaboration between researchers and communities. Public Health Report, 115, 243-248.

13.

Krueger, R.A. , & King, J.A. (1998). Involving community members in focus groups: Focus group kit 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

14.

Labonte, R. , & Laverack, G. (2001). Capacity building in health promotion, part 1: For whom? And for what purpose? Critical Public Health, 11(2), 111-127.

15.

Lantz, P.M. , Viruell-Fuentes, E. , Israel, B.A. , Softley, D. , & Guzman, R. (2001). Can communities and academia work together for public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(3), 495-507.

16.

Plough, A. , & Olafson, F. (1994). Implementing the Boston Healthy Start initiative: A case study of community empowerment and public health. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 221-234.

17.

Quandt, S.A. , Arcury, T.A. , & Pell, A.I. (2001). Something for everyone? A community and academic partnership to address farmworker pesticide exposure in North Carolina. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Suppl 3), 435-441.

18.

Rosenthal, B.B. (1998). Collaborations for the nutrition field: Synthesis of selected literature. Journal of Nutrition Education, 30, 246-267.

19.

Wallerstein, N. , & Duran, B. (2003). The conceptual, historical, and practice roots of community based participatory research and related participatory traditions . In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 53-76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

20.

Wolff, M. , & Maurana, C.A. (2001). Building effective community-academic partnerships to improve health: A qualitative study of perspectives from communities. Academic Medicine, 76(12), 151-152.

21.

Yadrick, K. , Horton, J. , Stuff, J. , McGee, B. , Bogle, M. , Davis, L. , et al. (2001). Perceptions of community nutrition and health needs in the Lower Mississippi Delta: A key informant approach. Journal of Nutrition Education, 33, 266-277.