In the past decade, there has been an enormous growth of distance education courses and programs in higher education. The growth of distance education is particularly evident in the field of health education. However, the enormous potential of distance education is tempered by one overriding question: How does one ensure that distance education coursework and degrees are of high quality? To this end, the purpose of this study is twofold: to identify quality indicators of distance education and to provide implications of the identified quality indicators for health education researchers and practitioners. The results of the study reveal common benchmarks and quality indicators that all parties deem important in designing, implementing, and evaluating distance education courses and programs.
American Federation of Teachers. (2000). Distance education: Guidelines for good practice. Retrieved September 2, 2006, from http://www.aft.org/higher_ed/downloadable/distance.pdf
2.
American Federation of Teachers. (2001). Virtual revolution: Trends in the expansion of distance education . Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
3.
Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Berge, Z.L. (2003). Planning and managing distance training and education in the corporate sector. In M.G. Moore & W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129-144). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Birnbaum, B.W. (2001). Foundations and practices in the use of distance education. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
6.
Chaney, B.H. (n.d.). History, theory, and quality indicators of distance education: A literature review. Retrieved April 11, 2007, from http://ohi.tamu.edu/distanceed.pdf
7.
Chickering, A.W., & Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 4, 75-81.
8.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation. ( 2002). Accreditation and assuring quality in distance learning . Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
9.
Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions. ( 2000). Statement of the regional accrediting commissions on the evaluation of electronically offered degree and certificate programs and guidelines for the evaluation of electronically offered degree and certificate programs. Retrieved September 2, 2006, from http://www.wiche.edu/wcet/resources/publications/guidelines.pdf
10.
Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions. ( 2001a). Best practices for electronically offered degree and certificate programs. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from http://www.wiche.edu/telecom/Accrediting-BestPractices.pdf
11.
Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions. ( 2001b). Statement of commitment by the regional accrediting commissions for the evaluation of electronically offered degree and certificate programs. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from http://www.wiche.edu/telecom/Accrediting-Commitment.pdf
12.
Dalziel, C. (2003). Community colleges and distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 663-671). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Daniel, J., & Mackintosh, W. (2003). Leading ODL futures in the eternal triangle: The mega-university response to the greatest moral challenge of our age. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 811-827). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Dillon, C., & Greene, B. (2003). Learner differences in distance learning: Finding differences that matter. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 235-244). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Eddy, J.M., Donahue, R., & Chaney, J.D. (2001). A contextual relative approach to designing a masters program in health education using distance education technologies . The International Electronic Journal of Health Education , 4, 377-384.
16.
Fresen, J. (2002). Quality in Web-supported learning. Educational Technology, 42(1), 28-32.
17.
Green, K.R. (2000). The 2000 campus computing survey. Retrieved January 15, 2006, from http://www.campuscomputing.net/
18.
Hannafin, M., Hill, J.R., Oliver, K., Glazer, E., & Sharma, P. (2003). Cognitive and learning factors in web-based distance learning environments. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 245-260). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Hensleigh, E., Eddy, J.M., Wang, M., Dennison, D., & Chaney, J.D. (2004). The impact of a computerized dietary assessment on nutrition knowledge. The International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 7, 43-49.
20.
Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000 ). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education.
21.
Laurillard, D. (1997). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
22.
Laurillard, D. (2000). New technologies and the curriculum. In P. Scott (Ed.), Higher education re-formed (pp. 133-153). London: Falmer Press.
23.
Mehrotra, C.M., Hollister, C.D., & McGahey, L. (2001). Distance learning: Principles for effective design, delivery, and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Meyer, K.A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on online learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
25.
Moore, M. G., & Anderson, W. G. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of distance education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Novak, R.J. (2002). Benchmarking distance education. New Directions for Higher Education, 118, 79-92.
27.
Oblinger, D.G. (1998). Technology and change: Impossible to resist. NCA Quarterly, 72(4), 417-431.
28.
Parker, A. (1997, Fall-Winter). How-to manual: Research from the field. Educational Technology Review, pp. 7-10.
29.
Shearer, R. (2003). Instructional design in distance education: An overview. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 275-286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Sherry, A.C. (2003). Quality and its measurement in distance education . In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 435-459). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Tulloch, J.B., & Sneed, J.R. (2000). Quality enhancing practices in distance education: Teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Instructional Telecommunications Council.
32.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 1999). The public health workforce: An agenda for the 21st century . Retrieved on August 13, 2006, from http://www.health.gov/phfunctions/pubhlth.pdf#search=`Public%20Health%20Workforce
33.
Watkins, R., & Kaufman, R. (2003). Strategic planning for distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 507-517). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Western Association of Schools and Colleges. ( 1997). Guidelines for distance education: Principles of good practice. Retrieved January 20, 2006, from http://www.wascweb.org/senior/guide/pgpal.htm
35.
Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications. (1995). Principles of good practice for electronically offered academic degree and certificate programs. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from http://www.wiche.edu/telcom/projects/balancing/principles.htm
36.
Willis, B. (Ed.). (1994). Distance education strategies and tools. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. Wlodkowski, R. (1985). Enhancing adult motivation to learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Wolcott, L.L. (2003). Dynamics of faculty participation in distance education: Motivations, incentives, and rewards. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 549-565). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
