There are many guides written for developing strategies and tactics related to advocacy, and many pages of text are devoted to developing advocacy plans. Less well described is the context within which grassroots advocacy campaigns can be successful. This article describes a successful campaign to establish a needle-exchange program (NEP) in Guilford County, North Carolina. The authors briefly describe NEPs in general, the history of NEPs in North Carolina, the mission of the North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition (NCHRC), and why this approach was considered particularly important for Guilford County. Then the context of the successful adoption of an NEP in Guilford County and the progress to make it legal will be examined, including describing the specific advocacy activities facilitated by members of NCHRC. The article concludes with a discussion of lessons learned that may be applicable to other grassroots advocacy initiatives.
Alter, M.J., & Moyer, L.A. (1998). The importance of preventing Hepatitis C virus infection among injection drug users in the United States. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, 18(Suppl. 1), S6-S10.
2.
Burris, S., Finucane, D., Gallagher, H., & Grace, J. (1996). The legal strategies used in operating syringe exchange programs in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 86(8), 1161-1166.
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2004). HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, Volume 16. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. Retrieved January 19, 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hasrlink.htm
4.
Center for Lobbying in the Public Interest. ( 2004). Lobbying, public policy, and the law. Retrieved January 19, 2006, from http://clpi.org/lobby_law_hm.html
5.
Church, E. (2006, January 12). Syphilis reports drop in Guilford . The Greensboro News and Record. Retrieved June 13, 2006, from http://ww.news-record.com/
6.
Eicher, A., Eno, R., Greaves, S., Kamina, A., Singh, M., & Soni, R. (1995, May 12). The New Haven Needle Exchange Program as a conduit to drug treatment (Community Research Project Report). New Haven, CT: Yale School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health.
7.
Friedman, S.R., Tempalski, B., Cooper, H., Perlis, T., Keem, M., Friedman, R., et al. (2004). Estimating numbers of injecting drug users in metropolitan areas for structural analyses of community vulnerability and for assessing relative degrees of service provision for injecting drug users . Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 81(3), 377-400.
8.
Galer-Unti, R.A., Tappe, M.K., & Lachenmayr, S. (2004). Advocacy 101: Getting started in health education advocacy. Journal of Health Promotion Practice, 5(3), 280-288.
9.
Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.
10.
Goldstein, A. (1998, April 21). Clinton supports needle exchanges but not funding. Washington Post, p. A1.
11.
Gostin, L.O., Lazzarini, Z., Jones, T.S., & Flaherty, K. (1997). Prevention of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne diseases among injection drug users: A national survey on the regulation of syringes and needles. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(1), 53-62.
12.
Guilford County. (2002). Health status of Guilford County 2000-2001 data book. Raleigh : North Carolina Center for Health Statistics and Guilford County Health Department, Communicable Disease. Available at http://www.guilfordhealth.org/
13.
Holmberg, S.D. (1996). The estimated prevalence and incidence of HIV in 96 large U.S. metropolitan areas. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 642-654.
14.
Kenen, J. (1997, February 19). Shalala praises needle exchange against HIV. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. A4.
15.
Lurie, P., Arthur, R., & Jones, S. (1998). The public health impact of needle exchange programs in the United States and abroad.
16.
San Francisco: University of California, San Francisco Prevention Sciences Group.
17.
Lurie, P., & DeCarlo, P. (1998, December). Does HIV needle exchange work?San Francisco: Center for AIDS Prevention Studies at the University of California, San Francisco, Public Citizen's Health Research Group.
18.
Morin, S., & Khan, J. (2006). What we do. Policy. San Francisco: Center for AIDS Prevention Studies at the University of California, San Francisco. Retrieved March 24, 2006, from http://www.caps.ucsf.edu/capsweb/missin.html
19.
Moseley, C., Valentine, J., & Foust, E. (2002). Lessons learned from syphilis elimination in Guilford County. Health Promotion Practice, 3(2), 188-196.
20.
North Carolina Drug Paraphernalia Act. Article 5B, 90-113.20 to 90-113.24 . (1981). Retrieved January 19, 2006, from http://www.ncleg.net/
21.
Ochs, M., & Samour, P. (2004). Growing policy with grassroots activism. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 104(12), 1786-1787.
22.
Reif, S., Geonnotti, K., & Whetten, K. (2006). HIV infection and AIDS in the Deep South. American Journal of Public Health, 96(6), 970-973.
23.
Reif, S., Golin, C., & Smith, S. (2005). Barriers to accessing HIV/AIDS care in North Carolina: Rural and urban differences. AIDS Care, 17(5), 558-565.
24.
Robles, R., Colon, H., Matos, T., Finlinson, H., Munoz, A., Marrero, C., et al. (1998). Syringe and needle exchange as HIV/AIDS prevention for injection drug users in Puerto Rico. Health Policy, 45, 209-220.
25.
Schorr, L.B. (1997). Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. New York: Doubleday .
26.
Southern States AIDS/STD Work Group. (2003 , March). The Southern states manifesto, HIV/AIDS & STDs in the South: A call to action. Washington, DC: National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors. Retrieved January 19, 2006, from http://www.hivdent.org/Manifesto.pdf
27.
Stivers, C. (1994). Grassroots efforts pursue alcohol policy reform: Refocusing upstream in New Mexico. American Journal of Health Promotion, 9(2), 125-136.
28.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1993, March). Needle exchange programs: Research suggests promise as an AIDS prevention strategy. Report to the Chairman, Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control, House of Representatives. GAO/HRD-93-60: 1-33.
29.
Wolff, T. (2001). The future of community coalition building. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 263-268.
