This study examined the personal experiences of twenty 14-to-19-year-old Texas youth cited for tobacco possession and attending a court-mandated tobacco awareness class. Guided by labeling theory, focus group questions addressed the process of citation, how youth viewed themselves following citation, how parents and peers viewed youth following citation, and youths’ views on the purpose and effects of the policy. Many youth felt stupid for being caught or determined that they were unlucky. Parents were upset that youth were caught smoking; however, most knew their children smoked. Peers felt sympathy for cited youth or made fun of them for being caught. Participants felt that the law was in existence to deter younger children from initiating smoking or to encourage older minors to quit smoking. However, youth also indicated that there was no purpose to the law and that instead of decreasing smoking it could lead to its continuation. Implications for practice are discussed.
Biglan, A., Duncan, T. E., & Ary, D. V. (1995). Peer and parental influences on adolescent tobacco use. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 315-330.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). Tobacco use among middle and high school students United States, 2002. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 52, 1096-1098.
3.
Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Sherman, S. J., Montello, D., & McGrew, J. (1986). Changes in peer and parent influence during adolescence: Longitudinal versus cross-sectional perspectives on smoking initiation. Developmental Psychology, 22, 327-334.
4.
Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., & Todd, M. (1998). Maternal socialization of adolescent smoking: The intergenerational transmission of parenting and smoking. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1189-1201.
5.
Crawford, M. A., Balch, G. I., Mermelstein, R., & the Tobacco Control Network Writing Group. (2002). Responses to tobacco control policies among youth. Tobacco Control, 11, 14-19.
6.
Downs, W. R., Robertson, J. F., & Harrison, L. R. (1997). Control theory, labeling theory, and the delivery of services for drug abuse to adolescents. Adolescence, 32, 1-24.
7.
Gottlieb, N. H., Goldstein, A. O., Flynn, B. S., Cohen, J. E., Bauman, K. E., Solomon, L. J., et al. (2003). State legislators’ beliefs about legislation that restricts youth access to tobacco products. Health Education & Behavior, 30, 209-224.
8.
Jacobson, P. D., Lantz, P. M., Warner, K. E., Wasserman, J., Pollack, H. A., & Ahlstrom, A. A. (2001). Combating teen smoking: Research and policy strategies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
Kaplan, H. B., Johnson, R. J., & Bailey, C. A. (1988). Explaining adolescent drug use: An elaboration strategy for structural equation modeling. Psychiatry, 51, 142-163.
10.
Langer, L. M., & Warheit, G. J. (2000) Teen tobacco court: A determination of the short-term outcomes of judicial processes with teens engaging in tobacco possession. Adolescent and Family Health, 1, 5-10.
11.
Langer, L. M., Warheit, G. J., Torres, G., & Williams, G. (2002). Teen tobacco court: Preliminary summary of the relationship between family factors and tobacco use behaviors among a sample of juvenile tobacco offenders. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 20-27.
12.
Ling, P. M., Landman, A., & Glantz, S. A. (2002). It is time to abandon youth access tobacco programmes. Tobacco Control, 11, 3-6.
13.
Livingood, W. C., Woodhouse, C. D., Sayre, J. J., & Wludyka, P. (2001). Impact study of tobacco possession law enforcement in Florida. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 733-748.
14.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Mosher, J.F. (1995). The merchants, not the customers: Resisting the alcohol and tobacco industries’ strategy to blame young people for illegal alcohol and tobacco sales. Journal of Public Health Policy, 16, 412-431.
16.
Palamara, F., Cullen, F. T., & Gersten, J. C. (1986). The effect of police and mental health intervention on juvenile deviance: Specifying contingencies in the impact of formal reaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 90-105.
17.
Pallonen, U., McAlister, A., Hu, S., & Meshack, A. (2003). Texas tobacco prevention pilot initiative: Findings on tobacco use among high school students in 2002. Unpublished report, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas-Houston School of Public Health.
18.
Pentz, M. A., Sussman, S., & Newman, T. (1997). The conflict between least harm and no-use tobacco policy for youth: Ethical and policy implications. Addiction, 92, 1165-1173.
19.
Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
20.
Smith, D. W., Colwell, B., Zhang, J. J., Brimer, J., McMillan, C., & Stevens, S. (2002). Theory-based development and testing of an adolescent tobacco-use awareness program. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26, 137-144.
21.
Wakefield, M., & Giovino, G. (2003). Teen penalties for tobacco possession, use, and purchase: Evidence and issues. Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl. I), I6-I13.
22.
Wolfson, M., & Hourigan, M. (1997). Unintended consequences and professional ethics: Criminalization of alcohol and tobacco use by youth and young adults. Addiction, 92, 1159-1164.
23.
Woodhouse, L. D., Sayre, J. J., & Livingood, W. C. (2001). Tobacco policy and the role of law enforcement in prevention: The value of understanding context. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 682-692.
