Public concerns about school shootings and safety draw attention to the role bystanders can play in preventing school violence. Although school violence prevention plans are often required, there is little guidance about whether these should address the roles of bystanders and what actions bystanders should take in different circumstances, from more common instances of bullying and fighting to rare, but potentially lethal, threats and use of weapons. Literature pertaining to bystanders is reviewed and applied to the school setting. The definition of bystander is expanded, including parents, teachers, and other school staff as well as youths and those who have information about potential violence as well as those who witness its occurrence. Barriers preventing bystanders from taking positive actions are discussed. The authors call on health promotion researchers and practitioners to work with school communities to identify norms, attitudes, and outcome expectancies that shape bystander behaviors to inform prevention efforts.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved May 25, 2005, from http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/%7Eaizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
3.
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Warning signs of teen violence. Retrieved December 3, 2002, from http://helping.apa.org/warningsigns/about.html
4.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark site of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5-33.
5.
Beaman, A. L., Barnes, P. J., Klentz, B., & McQuirk, B. (1978). Increasing helping rates through information dissemination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 406-411.
6.
Butterfield, F. (2001a, February 10). Students, mindful of Columbine, break silence to report threats. The New York Times, pp. A1-A1, A12-A12.
7.
Butterfield, F. (2001b, March 8). Tips by students result in arrests at 5 schools. The New York Times, p. A20-A20.
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2001). School health guidelines to prevent unintentional injuries and violence. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 50(RR22), 1-46.
9.
Craig, W., & Pepler, D. (1997). Observations of bullying and victimization in the schoolyard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2, 41-60.
10.
Cramer, R. E., McMaster, M. R., Bartell, P. A., & Dragna, M. (1988). Subject competence and minimization of the bystander effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1133-1148.
11.
DeVoe, J., Peter, K., Kaufman, P., Ruddy, S., Miller, A., Planty, M., et al. (2002). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2002 (National Center for Education Statistics Report No. 2003009). Retrieved October 23, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/schoolcrime/index.asp
12.
Dwyer, K., & Osher, D. (2000). Safeguarding our children: An action guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Departments of Education and Justice, American Institutes for Research.
13.
Dwyer, K., Osher, D., & Warger, C. (1998). Early warning, timely response: A guide to safe schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
14.
Fagan, J., & Wilkinson, D. L. (1998). Social contexts and functions of adolescent violence. In D. Elliott, B. Hamburg, & K. Williams (Eds.), Violence in American schools (pp. 55-93). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Fein, R., Vossekuil, B., Pollack, W., Borum, R., Modzeleski, W., & Reddy, M. (2002). Threat assessment in schools: A guide to managing threatening situations and to creating safe school climates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program and U.S. Secret Service, National Threat Assessment Center.
16.
Felson, R. B. (1982). Impression management and the escalation of aggression and violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 245-254.
17.
Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
Gaughan, E., Cerio, J. D., & Myers, R. A. (2001). Lethal violence in schools: A national study (Final Report). Alfred, NY: Alfred University. Retrieved December 3, 2002, from www.alfred.edu/teenviolence
19.
Horowitz, I. A. (1971). The effect of group norms on bystander intervention. Journal of Social Psychology, 83, 265-275.
20.
Janofsky, M. (2000, April 21). A year after Littleton, services and lawsuits. The New York Times, p. A14-A14.
Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 308-324.
23.
Lewin, T. (2001, March 7). Legal action after killings at schools often fails. The New York Times, p. A14-A14.
24.
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. (2002). Retrieved December 3, 2002, from www.m-w.comhome.htm
25.
Midlarsky, E. (1971). Aiding under stress. The effects of competence, dependency, visibility, and fatalism. Journal of Personality, 41, 302-327.
26.
Mulvey, E. P., & Cauffman E. (2001). The inherent limits of predicting school violence. American Psychologist, 56, 797-802.
27.
O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437-452.
28.
Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-418). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Olweus, D. (1992). Bullying among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention. In R. D. Peters, R. J. McMahon, and V. L. Quinsey (Eds.), Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 100-125). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
31.
Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 3-20). New York: Guilford.
32.
O’Toole, M. E. (2000). The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective. Quantico, VA: FBI Academy, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Critical Incident Response Group.
33.
Pantin, H. M., & Carver, C. S. (1982). Induced competence and the bystander effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 100-111.
34.
Piliavin, J. A., & Piliavin, I. M. (1972). Effect of blood on reaction to a victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 353-361.
35.
Planty, M. (2002). Third-party involvement in violent crime, 1993-1999 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report NCJ 189100). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
36.
Rapp, J. A., Carrington, F., & Nicholson, G. (1992). School crime and violence: Victims’ rights. Malibu, CA: Pepperdine University Press.
37.
Rasicot, J. (1999, March). The threat of harm. The American School Board Journal, pp. 15-18.
38.
Rutkowski, G. K., Gruder, C. L., & Romer, D. (1983). Group cohesiveness, social norms, and bystander intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 545-552.
39.
Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 453-459.
40.
Salmivalli, C. (2001). Group view on victimization: Empirical findings and their implications. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 398-419). New York: Guilford.
41.
Sampson, R., & Lauritson, J. (1994). Violent victimization and offending: Individual-situational and community-level risk factors. In A. J. Reiss & J. A. Roth (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence: Vol. 3. Social influences (pp. 311-374). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42.
Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. I. (1984). The role of bystanders in crime control. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 9-26.
43.
Siegel, A. E., & Kohn, L. G. (1959). Permissiveness, permission and aggression: The effects of adult presence or absence on aggression in children’s play. Child Development, 36, 131-141.
44.
Slaby, R. G. (1997). Psychological mediators of violence in urban youth. In J. McCord (Ed.), Violence and childhood in the inner city (pp. 171-206). New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Slaby, R. G., Wilson-Brewer, R., & DeVos, E. (1994). Aggressors, victims, and bystanders: An assessment-based middle school violence prevention curriculum (Final Report of Grant No. R49/CCR103559). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
46.
Steuteville-Brodinsky, M. (1981). Reporting violence, vandalism and other incidents in schools. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
47.
Tedeschi, J., & Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48.
Tisak, M., & Tisak, J. (1996a). Expectations and judgements regarding bystanders’ and victims’ responses to peer aggression among early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 19, 383-392.
49.
Tisak, M., & Tisak, J. (1996b). My sibling’s not my friend’s keeper: Reasoning about responses to aggressive acts. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16, 324-339.
50.
Tremlow, S. W., Sacco, F. C., & Williams, P. (1996). A clinical and interactionist perspective on the bully-victim-bystander relationship. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 60, 296-313.
51.
Verlinden, S., Hersen, M., & Thomas, J. (2000). Risk factors in school shootings. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 3-56.
52.
Vossekuil, B., Fein, R., Reddy, M., Borum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2002). Final report and findings of the Safe School Initiative: Implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program, and U.S. Secret Service, National Threat Assessment Center.
