An Analysis of Tobacco Industry Marketing to Lesbian,Gay,Bisexual,and Transgender (LGBT) Populations: Strategies for Mainstream Tobacco Control and Prevention
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2004
An Analysis of Tobacco Industry Marketing to Lesbian,Gay,Bisexual,and Transgender (LGBT) Populations: Strategies for Mainstream Tobacco Control and Prevention
Research on adult tobacco use consistently shows a higher prevalence among lesbian/gay/bisexual/ transgender (LGBT) populations than among the gen eral population—reasons why are largely unknown, and counterstrategies are critical. Tobacco industry marketing, uncovered when the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) forced companies to share its inter nal documents, provided insight. The American Legacy Foundation uncovered the industry campaign Project SCUM (Sub-Culture Urban Marketing) aimed at gays and the homeless. The formerly secret documents revealed specific marketing toward LGBT, whose rates increased when the MSA banned youth (but not other population) advertising. The industry reaches out to LGBT persons through direct and indirect advertising, community outreach, and sponsorships. Messages to LGBT have been relatively absent from advertising until recently, creating receptivity to such overtures. Reduc ing LGBT smoking rates is a public health challenge that will require exceeding the sense of validation tobacco advertising has created in LGBT communities.
American Legacy Foundation. (2002a). The evidence. Retrieved February 3, 2004, from www.projectscum.org/site/evidence.asp?mode=0
2.
American Legacy Foundation. (2002b). Project SCUM: How a tobacco company targeted the gay and homeless communities Available at www.projectscum.org
3.
America’s best cigarette. (2002a, October 15). Advocate, p. 7-7.
4.
America’s best cigarette. (2002b, November 12). Advocate, p. 11-11.
5.
Andreasen, A. R. (1995). Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environ ment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Backer Spielvogel, Horan Engraving. (1994). Parliament lights perfect recess (Document nos. 2061031553 and 2061032419). Available at www.pmadarchive.com
7.
Companies that care. (2002, June). Out, p. 73-73.
8.
Federal Trade Commission. (2003). Cigarette report for 2001. Retrieved February 3, 2004, from www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/06/2001cigrpt.htm
Goebel, K. (1994). Lesbians and gays face tobacco targeting. Tobacco Control, 3, 65-67.
11.
Klein, M. (1998, March). Gays and the arts. American Demograph ics, 20(3), 33-33.
12.
Ling, P., & Glantz, S. (2002). Using tobacco industry marketing research to design more effective tobacco control campaigns. Jour nal of the American Medical Association, 287(22), 2983-2989.
13.
Lipman, J. (1992, August 13). Philip Morris to push brand on gay media. The Wall Street Journal, p. B1-B1.
14.
Lucky Strike. (2002, July 5). Advertisement. Retrieved February 3, 2004, from www.lgbtcenters.org/images/tobaccoimages/ads/pages/Picture13_jpg.htm
15.
Lukenbill, G. (1999a). Smart spending: The gay and lesbian guide to socially responsible shopping and investing. Los Angeles: Consortium Book Sales.
16.
Lukenbill, G. (1999b). Untold millions: Secret truths about marketing to gay and lesbian consumers. New York, London, Oxford, UK: Harrington Park Press.
17.
National Association of Attorneys General. (1998). Master Settlement Agreement. Retrieved January 30, 2004, from www.naag.org/issues/tobacco/index.php?sdpid=919
18.
Offen, N., Smith, E. A., & Malone, R. E. (2003). From adversary to target market: The ACT-UP boycott of Philip Morris. Tobacco Control, 12, 203-207.
19.
Penaloza, L. (1996). We're here, we're queer, and we're going shopping! A critical perspective on the accommodation of gays and lesbians in the US marketplace. In D. L. Wardlow (Ed.), Gays, lesbians, and consumer behavior: Theory, practice and research issues in marketing (pp. 9-41). New York: Haworth.
20.
The people of the Philip Morris companies. (2002). Pride.02, 77-77.
21.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.
22.
Philip Morris. (1993, February 9). Benson & Hedges Special Kings 1993 media plan alternative newspaper discussion (Document no. 2044361631/1639). Retrieved February 3, 2004, from www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?DOCID=2044361631/1639
23.
R. J. Reynolds. (1995, December 12). Project SCUM (Bates: 518021121-518021129). Retrieved February 3, 2004, from http://tobaccodocuments.org/rjr/518021121-1129.html
24.
Rodriguez, Y. (1994, February 28). B&H qualitative research in San Francisco_Final report (Document no. 2047277151). Retrieved February 3, 2004, from http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm/2047277151-7152.html?pattern=2047277151%23images
25.
Ryan, H., Wortley, P. M., Easton, A., Pederson, L., & Greenwood, G. (2001). Smoking among lesbians, gays, and bisexuals: A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 21(2), 142-149.
26.
Scherer, R. (2002, March 20). Still fighting after all those billions. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved October 14, 2003, from www.csmonitor.com/2002/0320/p02s02-ussc.html
27.
Smith, E. A., & Malone, R. E. (2003). The outing of Philip Morris: Advertising tobacco to gay men. American Journal of Public Health, 93(6), 988-993.
28.
Smith, G. (1990, September 7). Philip Morris internal memo (Document no. 2021198897). Retrieved February 3, 2004, from http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm/2021198897-8900.html
29.
Stall, R. D., Greenwood, G. L., Acree, M., Paul, J., & Coates, T. J. (1999). Cigarette smoking among gay and bisexual men. American Journal of Public Health, 89(12), 1875-1878.
30.
Young Rubicam. (1995). Parliament lights perfect recess (Document nos. 2061031517 and 2061031505). Available at www.pmadarchive.com
