The Program Plan Index: An Evaluation Tool for Assessing the Quality of Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Program Plans

Abstract

To assess process, impacts, and outcomes among 45 distinct county teen pregnancy prevention initiatives, several standardized data collection procedures, instruments, and protocols were developed including the Program Plan Index (PPI). The PPI was developed to determine if program plans met legislative requirements and were consistent with best practices in public health program planning and teen pregnancy prevention. Analysis of proposals from 45 counties revealed that 12 county plans were evaluated as deficient, 14 as low, 14 as acceptable, 4 as good, and 1 as excellent. Explanations for overall performance included the following: criteria used to develop the PPI based on an in-depth understanding of best practices, variations in the criteria for county request for proposals, lack of prevention expertise at the local level, and minimal time for grantees to draw down funds. Statewide efforts to improve funded community-based teen pregnancy prevention planning, implementation, and empowerment evaluation efforts are ongoing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alan Guttmacher Institute. (1999). Teenage pregnancy: Overall trends and state-by-state information. New York: Author.

Bates, I. J., & Winder, A. E. (1984). Introduction to health education. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

Brindis, C. D., Irwin, C. E. Jr., Ozer, E. M., Handley M., Knopt, D. C., & Millstein, S. G. (1997). Improving adolescent health: An analysis and synthesis of health policy recommendations. San Francisco: University of California, San Francisco, National Adolescent Health Information Center.

Brown, J., Learner, M., Rickert, D., & Heidari, K. (1999). Teen pregnancy in South Carolina: 1999: The trends are getting better. Columbia: South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.

Butterfoss, F., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research, 8, 315-330.

Butterfoss, F., Goodman, R. M., Wandersman, A., Valois, R. F., & Chinman, M. (1996). The Plan Quality Index: An empowerment evaluation tool for measuring and improving the quality of plans. In D. Fetterman, S. Kaftarian, & A. Wansdersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 304-331). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dryfoos, J. G. (1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.

Green, L. W., & Krueter, M. W. (1991). Health promotion planning: An educational and environmental approach (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

Hayes, C. D. (1987). Risking the future: Adolescent sexuality, pregnancy and childbearing (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

10.

Israel, B. A., Checkoway, B., Schulz, A. J., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and communitycontrol. Health Education Quarterly, 20, 149-170.

11.

Kirby, D. (1997). No easy answers: Research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.

12.

Linney, J., & Wandersman, A. (1991). Prevention Plus 3: Assessing alcohol and other drug prevention programs at the school and community level: A four-step guide to useful program assessment. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Substance Abuse Prevention.

13.

Lowe, J., Windsor, R., & Valois, R. F. (1989). Quality assurance methods for managing employee health promotion programs: A case study in smoking cessation. Health Values, 13(2), 12-23.

14.

Maynard, R. (1996). Kids having kids: A Robin Hood Foundation special report on the costs of adolescent childbearing. New York: The Robin Hood Foundation.

15.

Minkler, M. (1989). Health education, health promotion, and the open society: An historical perspective. Health Education Quarterly, 16, 17-30.

16.

Parker, E. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Israel, B. A. (1999). Evaluating community-based health programs that seek to increase community capacity. New Directions for Evaluation, 83, 37-54.

17.

Ross, H. S., & Mico, P. R. (1980). Theory and practice in health education. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

18.

South Carolina Legislature. (1998). Chapter 122: County grants fund for adolescent pregnancy prevention initiatives. Retrieved October 3, 2000, from http://www.lpitr.state.sc.us/

19.

Valois, R. F., & Hoyle, T. B. (2000). Formative evaluation results from the Mariner Project: A coordinated school health pilot program. Journal of School Health, 70(3), 95-103.

20.

Ventura, S. J., Mosher, W. D., Curtain, S. C., Abma, J. C., & Henshaw, S. (1999). Highlights of trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates by outcome: Estimates for the United States, 1976-96. National Vital Statistics Reports, 47(29), 1-12.

21.

Vincent, M., Clearie, A., & Schluchter, M. (1987). Reducing adolescent pregnancy through school and community-based education. Journal of American Medical Association, 257, 3382-3386.

22.

Windsor, R., Baranowski, T., Clark, N., & Cutter, G. (1994). Evaluation of health promotion, health education and disease prevention programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.