Although an often desired goal, true partnership between community members and university researchers can be difficult to achieve. Strategies implemented in a diabetes prevention and control program in a Latino community may be effective in overcoming hurdles to collaborative research. The development of selection criteria can be useful for objectively choosing a community organization as a partner agency. The implementation of formal partnership principles is proposed as a strategy for building a successful partnership. Partnership principles are a powerful mechanism to assure ethical relations between collaborators. As a strategy for process evaluation, they can help organize data on the extent to which intent has translated into action. They provide a structure for project stability that can outlast individual commitments and a mechanism to keep project commitment on course and maintain active engagement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry. (1997). Principles of community engagement. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2.
City of Chicago Department of Public Health Epidemiology Program. (1998). Community area health inventory, 1994-1996: Vol. 1. Demographic and health profiles. Chicago: Department of Public Health.
3.
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1667-1676.
4.
Friere, P. (1982). Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In B. Hall, A. Gillette, & R. Tando (Eds.). Creating knowledge a monopoly? Participatory research in development. New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.
5.
Garbarino, J., & Abramowitz, R. H. (1992). Children and families in the social environment (2nd ed., rev.). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
6.
Goodman, R. M. (1998). Principles and tools for evaluating community-based prevention and health promotion programs. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 4(2), 37-47.
7.
Goodman, R. M., Speers, M. A., McLeroy, K., Fawcett, S., Kegler, M., & Parker, E., et al. (1998). Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 258-278.
8.
Green, L. W. (2000). Caveats on coalitions: In praise of partnerships. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 64-65.
9.
Herbert, C. P. (1996) Community-based research as a tool for empowerment: The Haida Gwaii Diabetes Project Example. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 87, 109-112.
10.
Israel, B. A., Shulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review Public Health, 19, 173-202.
11.
Kelley M. A., Rowley D., Delgado, J., Peacock, N., Chavez, N., & Aranda, V., et al., (2000). The development and application of principles for collaborative research to reduce disparities in prenatal health within a multicultural setting: The Chicago Social Networks Project. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Chicago.
12.
Kreuter, M. W., Lezin, N. A., & Young, L. A. (2000). Evaluating community-based collaborative mechanisms: Implications for practitioners. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 49-63.
13.
Maurana, C. A., Beck, B., & Newton, G. L. (1998). How principles of partnership are applied to the development of a community-campus partnership. Partnership Perspectives, 1, 47-53.
14.
McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351-377.
15.
Minkler, M. (2000). Using participatory action research to build health communities. Public Health Reports, 115(2 & 3), 191-198.
16.
Ottenritter, N. (1998). Community colleges and community-campus partnerships. Partnership Perspectives, 1, 55-62.
17.
Park, P. (1993). What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological perspective. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 1-19). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
18.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
19.
Rahnema, M. (1990). Participatory action research: The “Last Temptation of Saint” development. Alternatives, 15, 190-226.
20.
Robertson, A., & Minkler, M. (1994). New health promotion movement; A critical examination. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 295-312.
21.
Smedley, B. D., & Syme, L. (Eds.). (2000). Promoting health: Intervention strategies from social and behavioral research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press.
22.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 American Fact Finder-Race and Hispanic or Latino: 2000 (SF-1) [Electronic data tape]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce [Producer and Distributor].
23.
Wallerstein, N. (1999). Power between evaluator and community: Research relationships within New Mexico's healthier communities. Social Science and Medicine, 49, 39-53.
24.
Zambrana, R. E. (1996). The role of Latino/Hispanic communities in health services research: Strategies for a meaningful partnership. Journal of Medical Systems, 20, 317-328.
