This study assessed the level of integration of the ecological approach in Canadian public health organizations’ tobacco control programs for youth. The study used a model that identified intervention settings, targets, and strategies as key dimensions of an ecological approach to programs. An inventory of the tobacco youth programs implemented by regional public health organizations identified 148 organizations conducting such programs, 129 of which agreed to participate. Program descriptions were obtained through telephone interviews. The mean number of settings in which programs were implemented was 3 (SD = 1.3), with schools and communities being the most often-used settings. The mean number of different intervention strategies was 3.6 (SD = 1.7). Most frequently, programs directly targeted youths themselves, followed by interpersonal and organizational environment. Overall, the level of integration of the ecological approach was deemed high. Canadian public health organizations’ tobacco control programs aimed at youth are evolving toward a more comprehensive agenda.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aguirre-Molina, M., & Gorman, D. M. (1996). Community-based approaches for the prevention of alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use. Annual Review of Public Health, 17, 337-358.
2.
Altman, D. G. (1990). The social context and health behavior: The case of tobacco. In S. A. Shumaker, E. B. Schron, & J. K. Ockene (Eds.), The handbook of health behavior change (pp. 241-269). New York: Springer.
3.
Bal, D. G., Kizer, K. W., Felten, P. G., Mozar, H. N., & Niemeyer, D. (1990). Reducing tobacco consumption in California: Development of a statewide anti-tobacco use campaign. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 1570-1574.
4.
Baum, F., & Sanders, D. (1995). Can health promotion and primary health care achieve health for all without a return to their more radical agenda?Health Promotion International, 10, 149-160.
5.
Beaglehole, R., & Bonita, R. (1998). Public health at the crossroads: Which way forward?Lancet, 351, 590-592.
6.
Biglan, A., Glasgow, R. E., & Singer, G. (1990). The need for a science of larger social units: A contextual approach. Behavior Therapy, 21, 195-215.
7.
Brownson, R. C., Eriksen, M. P., Davis, R. M., & Warner, K. E. (1997). Environmental tobacco smoke: Health effects and policies to reduce exposure. Annual Review of Public Health, 18, 163-185.
8.
Calahan, D. (1991). An ounce of prevention: Strategies for solving tobacco, alcohol, and drug problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Catford, J. (1999). WHO is making a difference through health promotion. Health Promotion International, 14, 1-4.
10.
Chapman, S. (1985, April 20). Stop-smoking clinics: A case for their abandonment. Lancet, 918-920.
11.
Dryfoos, J. G. (1993). Preventing substance abuse: Rethinking strategies. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 793-795.
12.
Elder, J. P., Edwards, C. C., & Conway, T. C. (1997). Tobacco control. In F. D. Scutchfield & C. W. Keck (Eds.), Principles of public health practice (pp. 232-342). Albany, NY: Delmar.
13.
Ellis, G. A., Hobart, R. L., & Reed, D. F. (1996). Overcoming a powerful tobacco lobby in enacting local smoking ordinances: The Contra Costa County experience. Journal of Public Health Policy, 17, 28-46.
14.
Fiore, M. C. (1997). AHCPR smoking cessation guideline: A fundamental review. Tobacco Control, 6(Suppl. 1), S4-S8.
15.
Flay, B. R., Ockene, J. K., & Tager, I. B. (1992). Smoking: Epidemiology, cessation, and prevention. Chest, 102, 277S-301S.
16.
Forster, J. L., Hourigan, M., & McGovern, P. (1992). Availability of cigarettes to underage youth in three communities. Preventive Medicine, 21, 320-328.
17.
Forster, J. L., & Wolfson, M. (1998). Youth access to tobacco: Policies and politics. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 203-235.
18.
Freudenberg, N., Eng, E., Flay, B., Parcel, G., Rogers, T., & Wallerstein, N. (1995). Strengthening individual and community capacity to prevent disease and promote health: In search of relevant theories and principles. Health Education Quarterly, 22, 290-306.
19.
Gillies, P. (1998). Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 13, 99-120.
20.
Glantz, S. A. (1997). After ASSIST, what next? SCIENCE. Tobacco Control, 6, 337-345.
21.
Glantz, S. A., & Parmley, W. W. (1991). Passive smoking and heart disease: Epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry. Circulation, 83, 1-12.
22.
Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (1999). Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
23.
Green, L. W., Richard, L., & Potvin, L. (1996). Ecological foundations of health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 270-281.
24.
Hancock, T. (1993). The evolution, impact and significance of the Healthy Cities/Healthy Communities movement. Journal of Public Health Policy, 14, 5-18.
25.
Klausner, R. (1997). Evolution of tobacco control studies at the National Cancer Institute. Tobacco Control, 6(Suppl. 2), S1-S2.
26.
Levesque, L., Richard, L., & Potvin, L. (2000). The ecological approach in tobacco-control practice: Health promotion practitioner characteristics related to using the ecological approach. American Journal of Health Promotion, 14, 244-252.
27.
Lichtenstein, E. (1982). The smoking problem: A behavioral perspective. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 804-819.
28.
Lichtenstein, E. (1997). Behavioral research contributions and needs in cancer prevention and control: Tobacco use prevention and cessation. Preventive Medicine, 26, S57-S63.
29.
Lichtenstein, E., & Glasgow, R. E. (1992). Smoking cessation: What have we learned over the past decade?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 518-527.
30.
Lichtenstein, E., Wallack, L., & Pechacek, T. F. (1990-1991). Introduction to the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT). International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 11, 173-185.
31.
Manley, M., Lynn, W., Payne Epps, R., Grande, D., Glynn, T., & Shopland, D. (1997). The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study for Cancer Prevention: An overview. Tobacco Control, 6(Suppl. 2), S5-S11.
32.
Marty, P. J., Nenno, M., Hefelfinger, J., & Bacon-Pituch, B. (1996). Florida Tobacco Prevention and Control Program: Building capacity through collaboration. Journal of the Florida Medical Association, 83, 117-121.
33.
McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351-377.
34.
Miller, J. (1978). Living systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35.
Miller, J. L., & Miller, J. G. (1992). Greater then the sum of its parts. I. Subsystems which process both matter-energy and information. Behavioral Science, 37, 1-9.
36.
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (1997). Improving health through community organization and community building. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 30-52). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
37.
Novotny, T. E., Romano, R. A., Davis, R. M., & Mills, S. L. (1992). The public health practice of tobacco control: Lessons learned and directions for the states in the 1990s. Annual Review of Public Health, 13, 287-318.
38.
Orleans, T. (1995). Review of the current status of smoking cessation in the USA: Progress and opportunities. Tobacco Control, 4(Suppl. 2), S3-S9.
39.
Pierce, J. P., Gilpin, E. A., Emery, S. L., White, M. M., Rosbrook, B., & Berry, C. C. (1998). Has the California Tobacco Control Program reduced smoking?Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 893-899.
40.
Richard, L., Breton, E., Lehoux, P., Martin, C., & Roy, D. (1999). La perception de professionnels de santé publique face à deux dimensions de la promotion de la santé: Approche écologique et participation. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 90, 99-103.
41.
Richard, L., Potvin, L., Kishchuk, N., Prlic, H., & Green, L. W. (1996). Assessment of the integration of the ecological approach in health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 318-328.
42.
Sallis, J., & Owen, N. (1997). Ecological models. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, re-search, and practice (pp. 403-424). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Samet, J. M., Yach, D., Taylor, C., & Becker, K. (1998). Research for effective global tobacco control in the 21st century: Report of a working group convened during the 10th World Conference on Tobacco or Health. Tobacco Control, 7, 72-77.
44.
Shah, C. P. (1998). Public health and preventive medicine in Canada.Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto.
45.
Simons-Morton, D. G., Simons-Morton, B. G., Parcel, G. S., & Bunker, J. F. (1988). Influencing personal and environmental conditions for community health: A multilevel intervention model. Family and Community Health, 11, 25-35.
46.
Sorensen, G., Emmons, K., Kay Hunt, M., & Johnston, D. (1998). Implications of the results of community intervention trials. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 379-416.
47.
Stevenson, H. M., & Burke, M. (1992). Bureaucratic logic in social movement clothing: The limits of health promotion research. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 83(Suppl. 1), S47-S53.
48.
Stokols, D. (1992). Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. American Psychologist, 47, 6-22.
49.
Stokols, D. (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 282-298.
50.
Syme, L. S., & Alcalay, R. (1982). Control of cigarette smoking from a social perspective. Annual Review of Public Health, 3, 179-199.
51.
Wallack, L., & Dorfman, L. (1996). Media advocacy: A strategy for advancing policy and promoting health. Health Education Quarterly, 23, 293-317.
