There is a growing trend to involve young people in a range of advisory roles. As a research institution focused on healthy adolescent development, the Johns Hopkins Center for Adolescent Health recognizes its need for youth input on applied research activities as well as its ability to contribute to the positive development of the young people who serve in this capacity. Due to the lack of a tested theoretical model for establishing and maintaining a youth advisory committee, the Center’s Youth Advisory Committee is examined through the lens of a youth development framework that includes opportunities and supports for adult-youth relationships, youth participation, youth as resources, and program flexibility. Challenges and facilitating factors in the development and maintenance of a youth advisory committee are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adegbonmire, Y. (1996). Youth in the Outback: Branching out to discover a new environment. Centerworks, 2(1), 6-7.
2.
Alexander, C., & Morreale, M. (1998). Promoting the health of Maryland’s adolescents. In R. Lerner & L. Simon (Eds.), University-community collaborations for the twenty-first century (pp.317-334). New York: Garland.
3.
Barton, W., Watkins, M., & Jarjoura, R. (1997). Youths and communities: Toward comprehensive strategies for youth development. Social Work, 42(5), 483-493.
4.
Camino, L. (2000). Youth-adult partnerships: Entering new territory in community work and research. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), S11-S20.
5.
Canadee, A. (1999). Ten tips for starting a teen advisory group. Voice of Youth Advocates, 22(2), 102-102.
6.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century: The report of the Task Force on Education of Young Adolescents. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
7.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1992). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
8.
Checkoway, B. (1998). Involving young people in neighborhood development. Children and Youth Services Review, 20(9-10), 765-795.
9.
Israel, B., Schulz, A., Parker, E., & Becker, A. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.
10.
Jansen, C. (2001, February 11). Tapping teens: New Berlin’s youth board aims to get kids involved, generate fresh ideas. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, p. 01Z-01Z.
11.
Johsnon, M., Beebe, T., Mortimer, J., & Snyder, M. (1998). Volunteerism in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(3), 309-332.
12.
Lerner, R. (2000). Developing a civil society through the promotion of positive youth development. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 21(1), 48-49.
13.
Matysik, G. (1999). Adolescents as co-researchers: An examination of the effects of a participatory research project on adolescent development. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin.
14.
McIntyre, A. (2000). Constructing meaning about violence, school, and community: Participatory action research with urban youth. Urban Review, 32(2), 123-154.
15.
Morreale, M. (2001). Maryland’s legislative process: A guide for individuals concerned about the health of Maryland’s children and adolescents. Baltimore: The Center for Adolescent Health Promotion and Disease Prevention at the Johns Hopkins University What Works Project.
16.
New England in brief/Boston: City program targets dating violence. (2000, October 27). Boston Globe, p.B2-B2.
17.
Penuel, W., & Freeman, T. (1997). Participatory action research in youth programming: A theory in use. Child and Youth Care Forum, 26(3), 175-185.
18.
Pittman, K., & Irby, M. (1998). Reflections on a decade of promoting youth development. In S. Halperin (Ed.), The forgotten half revisited: American youth and young families 1988-2008 (pp. 159-160). Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.
19.
Roth, J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Murray, L., & Foster, W. (1998). Promoting healthy adolescents: Synthesis of youth development program evaluations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(4), 423-459.
20.
Sengupta, S. (2000, June 4). Youth court of true peers judges firmly. New York Times, pp. 1-1, 32-32.
21.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1991). Healthy People 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
22.
Wolfson, J. (1998). Use political power to put youth services first. Education Digest, 64(1), 10-16.
23.
Yates, M., & Youniss, J. (1998). Community service and political identity development in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 495-512.
24.
Zeldin, S. (1995). Community-university collaborations for youth development: From theory to practice. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10(4), 449-469.
25.
Zeldin, S. (2000). Integrating research and practice to understand and strengthen communities for adolescent development: An introduction to the special issue and current issues. Applied Developmental Science, 4, S2-S10.
