Dropout in perpetrator intervention programs (PIPs) is extensively documented in the literature, yet findings across various studies exhibit global inconsistency. This meta-analysis aimed to identify dropout rates among individuals attending PIPs and examine sociodemographic, violence-related, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and external variables related to dropout. A search was conducted across six databases, encompassing studies published between 2010 and 2022 in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. Thirty manuscripts, comprising data from 31 independent samples, were included. Dropout rates varied from 9% to 67%. Bivariate analysis results indicated that younger age (OR = 0.69), non-White ethnicity (OR = 1.54), unemployment (OR = 1.78), offender typology other than family only (OR = 2.45), substance abuse (OR = 1.78), presenting a personality disorder (OR = 1.21), engaging in problematic leisure activities (OR = 1.28), possessing a greater criminal history (OR = 1.47), and experiencing more adversity in childhood (OR = 1.44) were significantly correlated with dropout. Additionally, the inclusion of motivational strategies in treatment (OR = 0.44) significantly decreased the likelihood of dropout. Results from multivariate analyses revealed that younger age (OR = 0.63), presenting a personality disorder (OR = 1.73), and experiencing more adversity in childhood (OR = 2.16) were significantly associated with dropout. Notably, intimate partner violence characteristics established a significant negative relation with dropout (OR = 0.59). Findings indicate that variables associated with dropout align with those related to general and intimate partner violence recidivism, suggesting that individuals requiring more intensive intervention are those who derive less benefit from it.
AaronS. M.BeaulaurierR. L. (2017). The need for new emphasis on batterers intervention programs. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(4), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015622440
2.
APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be?American Psychologist, 63(9), 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839
3.
ArceR.AriasE.NovoM.FariñaF. (2020). Are interventions with batterers effective? A metanalytical review. Psychosocial Intervention, 29(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a11
4.
AriasE.ArceR.VilariñoM. (2013). Batterer intervention programmes: A meta-analytic review of effectiveness. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2013a18
5.
*AskelandI. R.HeirT. (2013). Early dropout in men voluntarily undergoing treatment for intimate partner violence in Norway. Violence and Victims, 28(5), 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00137
6.
BabcockJ. C.GreenC. E.RobieC. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1023–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001
*BennettL. W.HsiehC.-M.StoopsC. (2010). Underclass men in batterer intervention programs: Disorders and disparities. Families in Society, 91(4), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4038
9.
*BijlsmaA. M. E.van der PutC. E.VialA.van HornJ.OverbeekG.AssinkM. (2022). Gender differences between domestic violent men and women: Criminogenic risk factors and their association with treatment dropout. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP21875–NP21901. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211063015
10.
*BlatchC.O’SullivanK.Goodman-DelahuntyJ.WillisM.DelaneyJ. J. (2020). Effectiveness of a domestic abuse program for Australian indigenous offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(16), 1639–1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19900979
11.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
12.
BowenE.GilchristE. (2006). Predicting dropout of court-mandated treatment in a British sample of domestic violence offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(5), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160500337659
13.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley.
14.
*BrassardA.BelzileM.DugalC.GehlK.SavardC.DaspeM.PéloquinK.GodboutN. (2021). Predictors of discontinuation from individual treatment in men perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 12(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-2020-0042
15.
ButtersR. P.DroubayB. A.SeawrightJ. L.TollefsonD. R.LundahlB.WhitakerL. (2021). Intimate partner violence perpetrator treatment: Tailoring interventions to individual needs. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00763-y
16.
ByrneG.Ní GhrádaÁ. (2019). The application and adoption of four “third wave” psychotherapies for mental health difficulties and aggression within correctional and forensic settings: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 46, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.01.001
17.
*CannonC.FerreiraR. J. (2017). Understanding female intimate partner violence perpetration, parenting attitudes and batterer intervention program completion. Partner Abuse, 8(3), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.8.3.272
18.
CannonC.HamelJ.ButtellF.FerreiraR. J. (2016). A survey of domestic violence perpetrator programs in the United States and Canada: Findings and implications for policy and intervention. Partner Abuse, 7(3), 226–276. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.7.3.226
19.
CantosA. L.GoldsteinD. A.BrennerL.O’LearyK. D.VerborgR. (2015). Correlates and program completion of family only and generally violent perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Behavioral Psychology, 23(3), 549–569.
20.
*CarbajosaP.Catalá-MiñanaA.LilaM.GraciaE. (2017). Differences in treatment adherence, program completion, and recidivism among batterer subtypes. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.04.001
21.
CardN. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. Guilford.
22.
CarneyM.ButtellF.MuldoonJ. (2006). Predictors of batterer intervention program attrition: Developing and implementing logistic regression models. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(2), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v43n02_02
23.
CattaneoL. B.GoodmanL. A. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6(2), 141–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838005275088
ChangH.SaundersD. G. (2002). Predictors of attrition in two types of group programs for men who batter. Journal of Family Violence, 17(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016057328929
26.
ChengS.DavisM.Jonson-ReidM.YaegerL. (2021). Compared to what? A meta-analysis of batterer intervention studies using nontreated controls or comparisons. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(3), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019865927
27.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
28.
CollisonK. L.LynamD. R. (2021). Personality disorders as predictors of intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 88, 102047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102047
29.
*CraneC. A.EckhardtC. I. (2013). Evaluation of a single-session brief motivational enhancement intervention for partner abusive men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(2), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032178
30.
*CraneC. A.EckhardtC. I.SchlauchR. C. (2015). Motivational enhancement mitigates the effects of problematic alcohol use on treatment compliance among partner violent offenders: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(4), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039345
31.
*CuevasD.BuiN. (2016). Social factors affecting the completion of a batterer intervention program. Journal of Family Violence, 31(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9748-0
32.
CunhaO.CaridadeS. (2023). Batterer intervention program (BIP). In ShackelfordT. K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of domestic violence. Springer, Cham.
33.
CunhaO.GonçalvesR. A. (2013). Intimate partner violence offenders: Generating a data-based typology of batterers and implications for treatment. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 5(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2013a2
34.
*CunhaO.SilvaA.CruzA. R.Castro-RodriguesA.BragaT.GonçalvesR. A. (2022). Dropout among perpetrators of intimate partner violence attending an intervention program. Psychology, Crime and Law, 29(6), 634–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030337
35.
CunhaO.CaridadeS.AlmeidaT.GonçalvesR. A. (2023). Effectiveness of the motivational interviewing techniques with perpetrator of intimate partner violence: A non-randomized clinical trial. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2023.2189043
36.
CunhaO.PereiraB.SousaM.Castro RodriguesA. (in press). Cognitive behavioural “third wave” therapies in the treatment of justice-involved individuals: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior.
37.
DalyJ. E.PowerT.GondolfE. W. (2001). Predictors of batterer program attendance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(10), 971–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016010001
38.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
39.
EisenbergM.van HornJ.DekkerJ. E.AssinkJ. M.van der PutM.HendriksC. E.StamsJ.MG. J. J. (2019). Static and dynamic predictors of general and violent criminal offense recidivism in the forensic outpatient population: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(5), 732–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819826109
40.
Expósito-ÁlvarezC.LilaM.GraciaE.Martín-FernándezM. (2021). Risk factos and treatment needs of batterer intervention program participants with substance abuse problems. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 13(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2021a9
41.
Fernández-FernándezR.NavasM. P.SobralJ. (2022). What is known about the intervention with gender abusers? A meta-analysis on intervention effectiveness. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 32(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2021a17
42.
FineS. L.KaneJ. C.MurrayS. M.SkavenskiS.MunthaliS.MwengeM.PaulR.MayeyaJ.MurrayL. K. (2021). The role of violence acceptance and inequitable gender norms in intimate partner violence severity among couples in Zambia. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), NP10744–NP10765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519876722
43.
GannonT. A.OlverM. E.MallionJ. S.JamesM. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752
44.
GannonT. A.WardT. (2014). Where has all the psychology gone? A critical review of evidence-based psychological practice in correctional settings. Aggression and Violence Behavior, 19, 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.006
45.
GoodleyG.PearsonD.MorrisP. (2022) Predictors of recidivism following release from custody: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(7), 703–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962866
46.
*GoverA.JenningsW.DavisC.TomsichE.TewksburyR. (2011). Factors related to the completion of domestic violence offender treatment: The Colorado experience. Victims & Offenders, 6(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2011.557323.
47.
HigginsJ. T.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
48.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.StuartG. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476
49.
HongQ. N.PluyeP.F`abreguesS.BartlettG.BoardmanF.CargoM.DagenaisP.GagnonM. P.GriffithsF.NicolauB.O’CathainA.RousseauM. C.VedelI. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of copyright (#1148552), Canadian intellectual property Office.
JewellL.WormithJ. (2010). Variables associated with attrition from domestic violence treatment programs targeting male batterers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(10), 1086–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810376815
52.
KarakurtG.KoçE.ÇetinsayaE. E.AyluçtarhanZ.BolenS. (2019). Meta-analysis and systematic review for the treatment of perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.006
53.
KolbeV.BüttnerA. (2020). Domestic violence against men: Prevalence and risk factors. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 117(31–32), 534–541. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0534
54.
*KraanenF. L.VedelE.ScholingA.EmmelkampP. M. (2013). The comparative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP)and substance abuse treatment alone: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 189. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-189
55.
LaPostaG. M. P.CreechS. K.MacdonaldA.TaftC. T. (2019). Predictors of session attendance in intimate partner violence treatment for trauma-exposed veterans. Partner Abuse, 10(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.10.3.283
56.
LaskeyP.BatesE.TaylorJ. (2019). A systematic literature review of intimate partner violence victimization: An inclusive review across gender and sexuality. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 1–11. https://doi:10.1016/j.avb.2019.02.014
57.
*LauchK.HartK.BreslerS. (2017). Predictors of treatment completion and recidivism among intimate partner violence offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(5), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1299824
58.
*LilaM.GraciaE.Catalá-MiñanaA. (2018). Individualized motivational plans in batterer intervention programs: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000291
59.
LilaM.GraciaE.Catalá-MiñanaA. (2020). More likely to dropout, but what if they don’t? Partner violence offenders with alcohol abuse problems completing batterer intervention programs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(9–10), 1958–1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517699952
60.
LilaM.Martín-FernándezM.GraciaE.López-OssorioJ.GonzálezJ. L. (2019). Identifying key predictors of recidivism among offenders attending a batterer intervention program: A survival analysis. Psychosocial Intervention, 28(3), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2019a19
61.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
62.
MachadoA.SousaC.CunhaO. (2023). Bidirectional violence in intimate relationships: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15248380231193440. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231193440
63.
*MachJ.CantosA.WeberE.KossonD. (2020). The impact of perpetrator characteristics on the completion of a partner abuse intervention program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23–24), 5228–5254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517719904.
64.
MackayJ.BowenE.WalkerK.O’DohertyL. (2018). Risk factors for female perpetrators of intimate partner violence within criminal justice settings: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.06.004
65.
McGinnT.McColganM.TaylorB. (2020). Male IPV perpetrator’s perspectives on intervention and change: A systematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 21(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017742167
66.
McKeownA.KennedyP. J.McGrathJ. (2022). Female perpetrators of intimate partner violence, In BrownS. L.GelsthorpeL. (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook on what works with girls and women in conflict with the law: A critical review of theory, practice, and policy (pp. 354–367). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
67.
McMurranM.HubandN.OvertonE. (2010). Non-completion of personality disorder treatments: A systematic review of correlates, consequences, and interventions. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.12.002
68.
MorrisonP. K.JonesK.MillerE.ClussP. A.GeorgeD.FlemingR.ChangJ. C. (2022). An exploratory study of the relationship between human service engagement, recidivism and completion of a batterer intervention program. Journal of Family Violence, 37, 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00280-7
69.
*MurphyC. M.EckhardtC. I.CliffordJ. M.LaMotteA. D.MeisL. A. (2020). Individual versus group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner-violent men: A preliminary randomized trial. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(15–16), 2846–2868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517705666
70.
NessetM. B.Lara-CabreraM. L.DalsbøT. K.PedersenS. A.BjørngaardJ. H.PalmstiernaT. (2019). Cognitive behavioral group therapy for male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2010-1
71.
OlverM.WormithJ.StockdaleK. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022200
72.
OuzzaniM.HammadyH.FedorowiczZ.ElmagarmidA. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5, 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
73.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.McGuinnessL. A.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
74.
ParkS.KimS. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for intimate partner violence: The effects of the programs based on their purposes. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 2115–2129. https://doi.org/10.1177/152483802210847
75.
PearsonD. A. S.StewardC. D.FordA. K. (2020). Client retention in community treatment: Completer and noncompleter experiences of an individualized, needs-based partner abuse intervention program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 37(7–8), NP5367–NP5393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520907356
76.
*PetrucciC. J. (2010). A descriptive study of a California domestic violence court: Program completion and recidivism. Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-based Research, Policy, and Practice, 5(2), 130–160, https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880903423037
77.
PriesterM. A.KulkarniS.MennickeA.BellB. A. (2019). Factors associated with batterer intervention program attrition. Violence and Victims, 34(2), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-17-00067
78.
RadatzD. L.WrightE. M. (2016). Integrating the principles of effective intervention into batterer intervention programming: The case for moving toward more evidence-based programming. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014566695
79.
*RichardsT. N.JenningsW. G.MurphyC. (2021). Risk and protective factors for batterer intervention treatment program attrition: How completers are distinct from dropouts and no-shows. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(15–16), 7351–7370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519834096
80.
*RockR. C.SellbomM.Ben-PorathY. S.SalekinR. T. (2013). Concurrent and predictive validity of psychopathy in a batterers’ intervention sample. Law and Human behavior, 37(3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000006
81.
*Romero-MartínezÁ.LilaM.GraciaE.Martín-FernándezM.Moya-AlbiolL. (2021). Generally antisocial batterers with high neuropsychological deficits present lower treatment compliance and higher recidivism. Psychology of Violence, 11(3), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000296
82.
Romero-MartínezA.LilaM.GraciaM.Moya-AlbiolL. (2019). Dropout from court-mandated intervention programs for intimate partner violence offenders: The relevance of alcohol misuse and cognitive impairments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2402. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132402
83.
RooneyJ.HansonR. K. (2001). Predicting attrition from treatment programs for abusive men. Journal of Family Violence, 16(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011106902465
84.
RosenthalR. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In Cooper, H.Hedges, L. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). Russell Sage Foundation.
85.
SantirsoF.GilchristG.LilaM.GraciaE. (2020). Motivational strategies in interventions for intimate partner violence offenders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychosocial Intervention, 29(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a13
86.
*SartoS. B.EstebanP. J. (2010). Psicopatología, características de la violencia y abandonos en programas para hombres violentos con la pareja: Resultados en un dispositivo de intervención. Psicothema, 22(4), 593–599.
87.
SilvaT. P.CunhaO.CaridadeS. (2023). Motivational interview techniques and the effectiveness of intervention programs with perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 24(4), 2691–2710. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221111472
88.
SoleymaniS.BrittE.Wallace-BellM. (2018). Motivational interviewing for enhancing engagement in intimate partner violence (IPV) treatment: A review of literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.005
89.
*SoleymaniS.BrittE.Wallace-BellM. (2022). Motivational interviewing for enhancing engagement in intimate partner violence treatment: A quasi-experimental study. Partner Abuse, 13(1), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-2021-0031
Stephens-LewisD.JohnsonA.HuntleyA.GilchristE.McMurranM.HendersonJ.FederG.HowardL. M.GilchristG. (2021). Interventions to reduce intimate partner violence perpetration by men who use substances: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 22(5), 1262–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019882357
92.
*StoverC. S. (2015). Fathers for change for substance use and intimate partner violence: Initial community pilot. Family Process, 54(4), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12136
93.
*Subirana-MalaretM.Andrés-PueyoA. (2013). Retención proactiva y adherencia terapéutica en programas formativos para hombres maltratadores de la pareja. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2013a12
94.
ThijssenJ.de RuiterC. (2011). Identifying subtypes of spousal assaulters Using the B-SAFER. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(7), 1307–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510369129
95.
TraversÁ.McDonaghT.CunninghamT.ArmourC.HansenM. (2021). The effectiveness of interventions to prevent recidivism in perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 84, 101974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
96.
*TrebowE. A.BerkanovicE.HaradaP. U. (2015). The outcomes and process improvement project: Batterers’ intervention program evaluation comparing English-language and Spanish-language offenders. Partner Abuse, 6(3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.6.3.273
97.
*VanmeterC.LauxJ. M.PiazzaN.RitchieM.Tucker-GailK. (2015). Exploring the value of the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory-3 for predicting attrition and recidivism among perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling, 36(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaoc.12006
98.
WalshZ.SwoggerM. T.O’ConnorB. P.Chatav SchonbrunY.SheaM. T.StuartG. L. (2010). Subtypes of partner violence perpetrators among male and female psychiatric patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(3), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019858
99.
WilsonD. B.FederL.OlaghereA. (2021). Court-mandated interventions for individuals convicted of domestic violence: An updated Campbell systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(1), e1151. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1151
*ZarlingA.BannonS.BertaM. (2019). Evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy for domestic violence offenders. Psychology of Violence, 9(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000097
102.
*ZarlingA.RussellD. (2022). A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment theraphy and the Duluth model classes for men court-mandated to a domestic violence program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 90(4), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000722
