Commercial sexual exploitation (CSE) of youth is a public health issue with multiple negative consequences. Despite the complexities and comprehensiveness of service needs for youth experiencing CSE, the evidence base of effective services and programs lags far behind. This scoping review seeks to identify the most up-to-date evidence on programs for youth experiencing CSE that have been evaluated and found to be effective. We conducted a scoping review of current literature, including peer-reviewed articles as well as gray literature using a scientific approach to identify programs and service provisions specifically focused on youth experiencing CSE and examine empirical evidence for their effectiveness. A comprehensive search of five databases was completed in September 2020 then updated in April 2021 to identify relevant publications from January 1, 2000 to present. Additional program mining was conducted on evaluations of programs mentioned in the search results. A total of 3,597 citations from the database searches were screened for title and abstract and 190 citations were included for full-text review. The search process yielded 11 eligible articles with one additional report found through program mining. Identified programs targeted youth, providers, and consumers of CSE. While scientific rigor was not high, all included studies reported positive outcomes. Evidence base for effective services and programs is sparse. While more programs and services are being developed, studies should use rigorous research designs to test the effectiveness of these programs and services. Implications for practice and policy are discussed.
AbramsL. S.GodoyS. M.BathE. P.BarnertE. S. (2020). Collaborative responses to commercial sexual exploitation as a model of smart decarceration. Social Work (United States), 65(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa040
*BathE. P.GodoyS. M.MorrisT. C.HammondI.MondalS.GoitomS.FarabeeD.BarnertE. S. (2020). A specialty court for U.S. youth impacted by commercial sexual exploitation. Child Abuse and Neglect, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104041
4.
BowlegL. (2021). “The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house”: Ten critical lessons for Black and other health equity researchers of color. Health Education & Behavior, 48(3), 237–249.
5.
ColeSprangG.LeeR.CohenJ. (2016). The trauma of commercial sexual exploitation of youth: A comparison of CSE victims to sexual abuse victims in a clinical sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(1), 122–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514555133
6.
Chisolm-StrakerM.MillerC. L.DukeG.StoklosaH. (2020). A framework for the development of healthcare provider education programs on human trafficking part two: Survivors. Journal of Human Trafficking, 6(4), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2019.1635333
7.
CrenshawK. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev., 43, 1241–1299.
8.
*CriswellK. (2014). The thriving conversation project: A pilot assessment of the use of thriving principles with sexually exploited youth. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
9.
DierkhisingC. B.EastmanA. L.Walker BrownK. (2021). Examining housing instability among females who are system-involved: Comparing females with and without histories of commercial sexual exploitation. Child Maltreatment, 10775595211039463–10775595211039463. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595211039463
10.
DonkerT.GriffithsK. M.CuijpersP.ChristensenH. (2009). Psychoeducation for depression, anxiety and psychological distress: A meta-analysis. BMC Medicine, 7(1), 1–9.
11.
EdwardsJ. M.IritaniB. J.HallforsD. D. (2006). Prevalence and correlates of exchanging sex for drugs or money among adolescents in the United States. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 82(5), 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2006.020693
12.
EstesR. J.WeinerN. A. (2001). The commercial sexual exploitation of children in the US, Canada and Mexico. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, School of Social Work, Center for the Study of Youth Policy.
13.
Franchino-OlsenH.ChesworthB. R.BoyleC.RizoC. F.MartinS. L.JordanB.MacyR. J.StevensL. (2020). The prevalence of sex trafficking of children and adolescents in the United States: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(1):182–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020933873
14.
Franchino-OlsenH.MartinS. L.HalpernC. T.PreisserJ. S.ZimmerC.ShanahanM. (2021). Adolescent experiences of violence victimizations among minors who exchange sex/experience minor sex trafficking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP16277–NP16301. 08862605211021967. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211021967
15.
*GibbsD. A.WaltersJ. L. H.LutnickA.MillerS.KluckmanM. (2015). Services to domestic minor victims of sex trafficking: Opportunities for engagement and support. Children and Youth Services Review, 54(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.04.003
16.
GiesS.BobnisA.CohenM.MalamudM. (2019). Safe harbor laws: Changing the legal response to minors involved in commercial sex, phase 1. The legal review. Development Services, Inc. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/grants/253146.pdf
17.
GoldmanS.GoyalD. (2019). Knowledge regarding child victims of commercial sexual exploitation and the feasibility of using a smartphone application: A pilot study. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 15(2 PG-103–109), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000240
18.
GreenbaumJ.AlbrightK.TsaiC. (2020). Introduction to the special issue of child abuse and neglect: Global child trafficking and health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 100, 104321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104321
19.
GreenbaumV. J.LivingsM. S.LaiB. S.EdinburghL.BaikieP.GrantS. R.KondisJ.PetskaH. W.BowmanM. J.LeganoL.Kas-OsokaO.Self-BrownS. (2018). Evaluation of a tool to identify child sex trafficking victims in multiple healthcare settings. Journal of Adolescent Health, 63(6 PG-745–752), 745–752.
20.
HamptonM. D.LieggiM. (2020). Commercial sexual exploitation of youth in the United States: A qualitative systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(1), 57–70.
21.
*HickleK. E.Roe-SepowitzD. E. (2014). Putting the pieces back together: A group intervention for sexually exploited adolescent girls. Social Work With Groups, 37(2 PG-99–113), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2013.823838
22.
HickleK. E.Roe-SepowitzD. E. (2018). Adversity and intervention needs among girls in residential care with experiences of commercial sexual exploitation. Children and Youth Services Review, 93, 17–23.
23.
HounmenouC.O’GradyC. (2019). A review and critique of the US responses to the commercial sexual exploitation of children. Children and Youth Services Review, 98(Journal Article PG-188-198), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.005
Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. (2013). Confronting commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking of minors in the United States. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18358.
26.
*KimH.-W.ParkT.QuiringS.BarrettD. (2018). The anti-human trafficking collaboration model and serving victims: Providers’ perspectives on the impact and experience. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 15(2 PG-185–202), 185–202.
LincolnT. M.WilhelmK.NestoriucY. (2007). Effectiveness of psychoeducation for relapse, symptoms, knowledge, adherence and functioning in psychotic disorders: A meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 96(1–3), 232–245.
29.
MacyR. J.KleinL. B.ShuckC. A.RizoC. F.Van DeinseT. B.WretmanC. J.LuoJ. (2021). A scoping review of human trafficking screening and response. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15248380211057273.
30.
MiddletonJ.EdwardsE. (2021). Detecting child trafficking within the child welfare system: recommendations and best practices for screening and identification protocols in the United States. Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal, 9(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2021.09.00335
31.
*MillerA. J.Arnold-ClarkJ.BrownK. W.Ackerman-BrimbergM.GuymonM. (2020). Featured counter trafficking program: The law enforcement first responder protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 100, 104173–104173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104173
32.
MoynihanM.PitcherC.SaewycE. (2018). Interventions that foster healing among sexually exploited children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 27(4), 403–423.
33.
*MurphyM.BennettN.KottkeM. (2016). Development and pilot test of a commercial sexual exploitation prevention tool: A brief report. Violence and Victims, 31(1 PG-103–110), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00055
34.
MurayaD. N.FryD. (2016). Aftercare services for child victims of sex trafficking: A systematic review of policy and practice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(2), 204–220.
35.
O’BrienJ. E.JordanB.HoneycuttN.WilsnackC.DavisonC. (2019). “It’s all about breaking down those barriers. . .”: Exploring survivors’ perspectives on services and treatment needs following commercial sexual exploitation during childhood. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 16(2 PG-160–177), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2019.1572560
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.McGuinnessL. A., . . . MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001
38.
PinaA. A.PoloA. J.HueyS. J.Jr. (2019). Evidence-based psychosocial interventions for ethnic minority youth: The 10-year update. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 48(2), 179–202.
39.
RaffertyY. (2018). Mental health services as a vital component of psychosocial recovery for victims of child trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 88(3), 249.
40.
Richie-ZavaletaA. C.BaranikS.MerschS.AtaiantsJ.RhodesS. M. (2021). From victimization to restoration: Multi-disciplinary collaborative approaches to care and support victims and survivors of human trafficking. Journal of Human Trafficking, 7(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2020.1730132
41.
*RothmanE. F.PreisS. R.BrightK.ParukJ.Bair-MerrittM.FarrellA. (2020). A longitudinal evaluation of a survivor-mentor program for child survivors of sex trafficking in the United States. Child Abuse & Neglect, 100(Journal Article PG-104083), 104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104083
42.
SanchezR. V.SpeckP. M.PatricianP. A. (2019). A concept analysis of trauma coercive bonding in the commercial sexual exploitation of children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 46, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.02.030
43.
*ShivelyM.JalbertS. K.KlingR.RhodesW.FinnP.FlygareC.TierneyL.HuntD.SquiresD.DyousC.WheelerK. (2008). Final report on the evaluation of the first offender prostitution program: Report summary, pp.1–18. papers2://publication/uuid/67AD764D-E2F0-4029-B653-A79ADEFCF96C
TolanP. H.HenryD. B.SchoenyM. S.LovegroveP.NicholsE. (2014). Mentoring programs to affect delinquency and associated outcomes of youth at risk: A comprehensive meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(2), 179–206.
48.
TwiggN. M. (2017). Comprehensive care model for sex trafficking survivors. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 49(3), 259–266
49.
*TwillS. E.GreenD. M.TraylorA. (2010). A descriptive study on sexually exploited children in residential treatment. Child & Youth Care Forum, 39(3 PG-187–199), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9098-2
50.
VarmaS.GillespieS.McCrackenC.GreenbaumV. J. (2015). Characteristics of child commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking victims presenting for medical care in the United States. Child Abuse & Neglect, 44, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.004
WilliamsonC.BarrowsJ.BioethicsM.Gracehaven, TrishaS.StateO.KellyG.CountyC.SwartzS.Toledo, OhashiM.CandidateM.SullivanD.RossC.GezinskiL.CandidateDieffenderferT. (2010). Ohio trafficking in persons study commission research and analysis sub-committee report on the prevalence of human trafficking in Ohio to attorney general Richard Cordray research committee members attorney general’s office.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
