Online Disclosure of Sexual Victimization: A Systematic Review

Abstract

We map the available scientific literature on how and why victims of sexual violence use digital platforms in the aftermath of victimization. Twenty-four empirical studies on sexual victimization and online disclosure were identified by systematically searching Web of Science and PsycINFO, checking reference lists, and consulting authors about relevant publications. The literature on online disclosure of sexual victimization does not yield a coherent picture. International literature pays limited attention to the various components of online disclosure like the characteristics of victims who disclosure online and the characteristics of the disclosure messages. Most studies focused on motivations for and reactions to online disclosure. Victims of sexual violence disclose sexual victimization online to seek support for clarification and validation, unburdening, documenting, seeking justice, informing others, or commercial goals (individual-oriented disclosure) and to provide support, educate, and as a form of activism (other-oriented disclosure). Responses to online disclosure are predominantly positive. Negative responses are rare. This review provides a comprehensive overview of multidisciplinary empirical information and displays knowledge gaps in victimological research. Future research should use robust quantitative and/or qualitative designs with substantial sample sizes, comparing victims who do disclose their sexual victimization online to victims who do not and comparing disclosure on different online platforms to increase generalizability. Potential for online support is identified, in which online disclosure can serve as a relatively safe alternative to off-line disclosure. This offers points of intervention for assistance and victim support in facilitating the use of the internet for support for victims of sexual violence.

Keywords

sexual victimization sexual assault sexual abuse victim/survivor online disclosure social media viral justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahams

(2017). Listen to me: A reflection on practice in qualitative interviewing. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(2), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868017X15090095938377

Ahrens

C. E.

Campbell

Ternier-Thames

N. K.

Wasco

S. M.

Sefl

(2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of rape survivors’ first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00329.x

Ahrens

C. E.

Rios-Mandel

L. C.

Isas

del Carmen Lopez

(2010). Talking about interpersonal violence: Cultural influences on Latinas’ identification and disclosure of sexual assault and intimate partner violence. Psychological Trauma, 2(4), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018605

Altman

Taylor

D. A.

(1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

*Andalibi

Haimson

O. L.

De Choudury

Forte

(2016). Understanding social media disclosures of sexual abuse through the lenses of support seeking and anonymity [ Conference session]. CHI’16 (pp. 3906–3918), May 7–12, San Jose, CA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858096

*Andalibi

Haimson

O. L.

De Choudury

Forte

(2018). Social support, reciprocity, and anonymity in responses to sexual abuse disclosures on social media. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 25(5), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234942

*Barta

. (2019). Reclaiming publicness in the face of sexual assault: Social media, disclosure, and visibility [Dissertation]. Retrieved March 10, 2020, from http://hdl.handle.net/1773/45159

Bhuptani

P. H.

Messman-Moore

T. L.

(2019). Blame and shame in sexual assault. In O’Donohue

W. T.

Schewe

P. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault and sexual assault prevention (pp. 309–322). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23645-8_18

*Bogen

K. W

Bleiweiss

K. K.

Leach

N. R.

Orchowski

L. M

. (2019). #MeToo: Disclosure and response to sexual victimisation on Twitter. Journal of Interpersonal Violenc, 00(0), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519851211

10.

*Bogen

K. W

Bleiweiss

K. K

& Orchowski

L. M

. (2018a). Sexual violence is #notokay: Social reactions to disclosures of sexual victimisation on Twitter. Psychology of Violence, 9(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000192

11.

*Bogen

, K. W

Millman

Huntington

Orchowski

, L. M

. (2018b). A qualitative analysis of disclosing sexual victimisation by #notokay during the 2016 presidential election. Violence and Gender, 5(3), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0053

12.

Burt

M. R.

(1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217

13.

Campbell

Wasco

S. M.

Ahrens

C. E.

Sefl

Barnes

H. E.

(2001). Preventing the “second rape”: Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(12), 1239–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016012002

14.

Carretta

Burgess

DeMarcos

(2016). To tell or not to tell. Violence Against Women, 22(13), 1499–1518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215590672

15.

Carson

Babad

Brown

E. J.

Brumbaugh

Castillo

Nikulina

(2019). Why women are not talking about it: Reasons for nondisclosure of sexual victimisation and associated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. Violence Against Women, 26(3–4), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219832913

16.

Clement

. (2020, February 14). Global social media ranking 2019. Retrieved on March 24, 2020, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/

17.

Crocker

Garcia

J. A.

Nuer

(2008). From egosystem to ecosystem in intergroup interactions: Implications for intergroup reconciliation. In Nadler

Malloy

T. E.

Fisher

J. D.

(Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 171–194). Oxford University Press.

18.

Cutrona

C. E.

Suhr

J. A.

(1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019002002

19.

*Dancig-Rosenberg

Peleg

. (2020a). #MeToo influences the law? The sex offender perspective on the impact of the official media and the social media on the law [in Hebrew]. Mishpatim Online. https://lawjournal.huji.ac.il/article/12/1736

20.

*Dancig-Rosenberg

Peleg

. (2020b). Naming, blaming, shaming: Sexual assault victims’ perceptions of the practice of shaming their assailants on Facebook [in Hebrew]. University of Haifa Law Review. Retrieved September 8, from https://law.biu.ac.il/sites/law/files/shared/segel/tikshoretmishpatimonline.pdf

21.

*Dancig-Rosenberg

Peleg

. (2020c). Post-trauma and post: Emotion processing of sexual assault victims in criminal proceedings and on Facebook [in Hebrew]. Law, Society & Culture. Retrieved September 6, 2021, from https://law.biu.ac.il/sites/law/files/shared/segel/posttrauma.pdf

22.

Dworkin

E. R.

Menon

S. V.

Bystrynski

Allen

N. E.

(2017). Sexual assault victimisation and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 56, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.06.002

23.

Dworkin

E. R.

Newton

Allen

N. E.

(2018). Seeing roses in the thorn bush: Sexual assault survivors’ perceptions of social reactions. Psychology of Violence, 8(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000082

24.

Edwards

K. M.

Turchik

J. A.

Dardis

C. M.

Reynolds

Gidycz

C. A.

(2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 65, 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2

25.

*Fawcett

H. E.

Shrestha

(2016). Blogging about sexual assault: A thematic analysis. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 18(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-05-2015-0032

26.

*Fileborn

B. J.

(2017). Justice 2:0: Street harassment victims’ use of social media and online activism as sites of informal justice. British Journal of Criminology, 57(6), 1482–1501. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw093

27.

*Fornari

L. F.

Sakata-So

K. N.

Egry

E. Y.

da Fonseca

R. M. G. S.

(2018). Gender and generation perspectives in the narratives of sexually abused women in childhood. Revista Latino Americana de Enfermagem, 26, e3078. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2771.3078

28.

*Gundersen

K. K.

Zaleski

K. L.

(2020). Posting the story of your sexual assault online: A phenomenological study of the aftermath. Feminist Media Studies, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1706605

29.

*Harrington

(2019). Neo-liberal subjectivity, self-branding and “my rape story” Youtube videos. Critical Sociology, 45(7-8), 1181–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920518778107

30.

Hébert

Tourigny

Cyr

McDuff

Joly

(2009). Prevalence of childhood sexual abuse and timing of disclosure in a representative sample of adults from Quebec. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(9), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370905400908

31.

Hinduja

Patchin

J. W.

(2008). Personal information of adolescents on the internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.004

32.

Jacques-Tiura

A. J.

Tkatch

Abbey

Wegner

(2010). Disclosure of sexual assault: Characteristics and implications for posttraumatic stress symptoms among African American and Caucasian survivors. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 11(2), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299730903502938

33.

Joinson

A. N.

(1998). Causes and effects of disinhibition on the internet. In Gackenbach

(Ed.) The psychology of the internet (pp. 43–60). Academic Press.

34.

Kennedy

A. C.

Prock

K. A

. (2018). I still feel like i am not normal: A review of the role of stigma and stigmatization among female survivors of child sexual abuse, sexual assault, and intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(5), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016673601

35.

*Lokot

. (2018). #iamnotafraidtosayit: Stories of sexual violence as everyday political speech on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 21(6), 802–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1430161

36.

London

Bruck

Wright

D. B.

Ceci

S. J.

(2008). Review of the contemporary literature on how children report sexual abuse to others: Findings, methodological issues, and implications for forensic interviewers. Memory, 16(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701725732

37.

*Loney-Howes

(2018). Shifting the rape script: Coming out online as a rape victim. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 39(2), 26–57. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.39.2.0026

38.

*Lowenstein-Barkai

. (2020). #Me(n)Too? Online social support toward male and female survivors of sexual victimisation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 00(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520905095

39.

*Masciantonio

Schumann

Bourguignon

. (2020). Sexual and gender-based violence: To tweet or not to tweet? Retrieved March 10, 2020, from https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-02502330/document

40.

*Mendes

Keller

Ringrose

(2019). Digitized narratives of sexual violence: Making sexual violence felt and known through digital disclosures. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1290–1310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818820069

41.

*Modrek

Chakalov

(2019). The #MeToo movement in the United States: Text analysis of early Twitter conversations. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(9), e13837. https://doi.org/10.2196/13837

42.

*Moors

Webber

(2012). The dance of disclosure: Online self-disclosure of sexual assault. Qualitative Social Work, 12(6), 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325012464383

43.

Nagy

(2016). Narrative construction of sexual violence and rape online. International Journal of Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i2.270

44.

*O’Neill

. (2018). “Today I speak”: Exploring how victim-survivors use Reddit. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 7(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i1.402

45.

Orchowski

L. M.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2015). Psychological consequences associated with positive and negative responses to disclosure of sexual assault among college women: A prospective study. Violence Against Women, 21(7), 803–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215584068

46.

Orchowski

L. M.

Untied

A. S.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2013). Social reactions to disclosure of sexual victimisation and adjustment among survivors of sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(10), 2005–2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512471085

47.

Pennebaker

(1997). Opening up: The healing power of expressing emotions. Guilford.

48.

Pennebaker

Seagal

. (1999). Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(10), 1243–1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199910)55:10<1243::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-N

49.

Pennebaker

Zech

Rime

(2001). Disclosing and sharing emotion: Psychological, social, and health consequences. In Stroebe

Hansson

Stroebe

Schut

(Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 517–543). American Psychological Association.

50.

Petronio

(2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. State University of New York Press.

51.

Powell

(2015). Seeking rape justice: Formal and informal responses to sexual violence through technosocial counter-publics. Theoretical Criminology, 19(4), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615576271

52.

Rime

(1995). Mental rumination, social sharing, and the recovery from emotional exposure. In Pennebaker

J. W.

(Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 271–291). American Psychological Association.

53.

Sable

M. R.

Danis

Mauzy

D. L.

Gallagher

S. K.

(2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: Perspectives of college students. Journal of American Health, 55(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.55.3.157-162

54.

*Schneider

K. T.

Carpenter

N. J.

(2020). Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: Incidents, coping responses, and social reactions. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 39(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-09-2018-0161

55.

Sinclair

B. B.

Gold

S. R.

(1997). The psychological impact of withholding disclosure of child sexual abuse. Violence and Victims, 12(2), 137–145.

56.

Smith

. (2010). Does posting in an online community encourage young people to disclose sexual assault or abuse? Retrieved March 10, 2020, from http://www.secasa.com.au/assets/Documents/does-posting-in-an-online-community-encourage-young-people-to-disclose.pdf

57.

Starzynski

L. L.

Ullman

S. E.

Filipas

H. H.

Townsend

S. M.

(2005). Correlates of women’s sexual assault disclosure to informal and formal support sources. Violence and Victims, 20(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2005.20.4.417

58.

Sudderth

L. K

. (1998). “It’ll come right back at me”: The interactional context of discussing rape with others. Violence Against Women, 4(5), 572–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004005004

59.

Suler

(2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

60.

Thompson

Wood

Rose

(2016). Viral justice: Survivor-selfies, internet virality and justice for victims of intimate partner violence [Conference session]. Presented at the British Society of Criminology Conference: “Inequalities in a Diverse World.” Retrieved March 10, 2020 from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/46808771/Viral%20Justice_-_paper-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1630916201&Signature=a3uxUBaOHFCa02LpQt6KFXFgenF7xIiJVhNprd5zAkANVR410u05tIGbRKDDoHZb6F4LqnMGz3b0e6YF1UeQa5BtEjpcJgR7la~uQn7ZNW1gigzl9VPyXt0BWLH1cqGVseTMRTc~SxDCsrcxRUqbvtIFnXSSJNx~MWC7cFvu~7OkME6WIfJdPULJWW73YovcqIQNn0wofR3WVgEEcTSQS-OarI3nfVpjT6SRR30Q1G-PJ2co-5dStjgVQQEc0Z-IYp1UkHCvDcyQEnOVJPHSvZ4U~vTU~5dQDpV-pPDn2OXo-QIqchKYziDVMRc8cSKlsrgs6jimr3I94mQ8qMFeFQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

61.

Thompson

Sitterle

Clay

Kingree

(2007). Reasons for not reporting victimisations to the police: Do they vary for physical and sexual incidents? Journal of American College Health, 55(5), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.55.5.277-282

62.

Ullman

S. E.

(2000). Psychometric characteristics of the Social Reactions Questionnaire: A measure of reactions to sexual assault victims. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(3), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00208.x

63.

Ullman

S. E.

(2011). Is disclosure of sexual traumas helpful? Comparing experimental laboratory versus field study results. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 20(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.546751

64.

Ullman

S. E.

O’Callaghan

Shepp

Harris

(2020). Reasons for and experiences of sexual assault nondisclosure in a diverse community sample. Journal of Family Violence, 35, 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00141-9

65.

*Webber

(2014). Sexual assault in relationships: Seeking help on a Q&A website. Australian Social Work, 67(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2013.834065

66.

*Webber

Moors

(2015). Engaging in cyberspace: Seeking for help for sexual assault. Child and Family Social Work, 20(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12052

67.

*Webber

Wilmot

(2012). Somazone report: Social media and help seeking by young people on sexual assault. Retrieved July 16, 2018, from http://www.secasa.com.au/assets/Documents/Social-Media-and-Help-Seeking-by-Young-People-on-Sexual-AssaultSomazone-Report2012.pdf

68.

Williams

J. E.

(1984). Secondary victimisation: Confronting public attitudes about rape. Victimology, 9(1), 66–81.

69.

Zinzow

Thompson

(2011). Barriers to reporting sexual victimisation: Prevalence and correlates among undergraduate women. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(7), 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.613447

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.24 MB