Police officers are society’s first interveners in intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) and are essential for victim safety. Despite IPVAW laws, police attitudes influence their real actions during IPVAW intervention. However, the fuzzy conceptualization of the construct deters the pursuit of conclusive evidence. This systematic review sought to identify the components of police attitudes toward intervention in IPVAW and their determinants. A search was conducted through several databases (e.g., Web of Science). Papers were included if they (a) provided original empirical findings or were review studies, (b) were published between 1990 and 2019, (c) were written in Spanish or English, (d) alluded to police officers, and (e) focused on police attitudes toward intervention in IPVAW or their determinants. Fifty-seven papers were included. The studied components of police attitudes toward intervention in IPVAW extracted from the literature were tolerance of IPVAW, minimal police involvement, unsupportive and supportive attitudes toward the legal system and legislation against IPVAW, understanding of the complex nature of abuse, and IPVAW intervention as an important police task. Moreover, the central role of individual and situational determinants in police attitudes toward intervention in IPVAW was confirmed, whereas organizational and societal determinants were studied scarcely. This review proposes a framework upon which to build operational definition of police attitudes toward intervention in IPVAW and includes remarks on police backgrounds and the situational characteristics of IPVAW events that are essential in shaping police procedures for managing them. Empirical evidence should be transferred to police training and standard operating procedures.
*ApplegateR. J. (2006). Changing local policy and practice towards the policing of domestic violence in England and Wales. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 29(2), 368–383. http://doi.org/101108/13639510610667718
2.
*ArnoldG.SlusserM. (2015). Silencing women’s voices: Nuisance property laws and battered women. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(4), 908–936. http://doi.org/101111/lsi.12123
3.
*BaldryA. C.PagliaroS. (2014). Helping victims of intimate partner violence: The influence of group norms among lay people and the police. Psychology of Violence, 3(4), 334–347. http://doi.org/101037/a0034844
4.
*BaldryA. C.PagliaroS.PorcaroC. (2013). The rule of law at time of masculine honor: Afghan police attitudes and intimate partner violence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(3), 363–374. http://doi.org/101177/1368430212462492
5.
*BalenovichJ.GrossiE.HughesT. (2008). Toward a balanced approach: Defining police roles in responding to domestic violence. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 19–31. http://doi.org/101007/s12103-007-9028-5
6.
*BallucciD. G.CampbellC.AnnM. (2017). The power of attitude: The role of police culture and receptivity of risk assessment tools in IPV calls. Policing, 11(3), 242–257. http://doi.org/101093/police/pax018
7.
*BlountW. R.YegidisB. L.RandolphM. M. (1992). Police attitudes toward preferred arrest: Influences of rank and productivity. American Journal of Police, 11(3), 35–52.
8.
*BrunettoY.Farr-WhartonR. (2005). The role of management post-NPM in the implementation of new policies affecting police officers’ practices. Policing, 28(2), 221–241. http://doi.org/101108/13639510510597870
9.
*CampbellM. A.GillC.BallucciD. (2018). Informing police response to intimate partner violence: Predictors of perceived usefulness of risk assessment screening. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 33(2), 175–187. http://doi.org/101007/s11896-017-9244-y
10.
*ChuD. C.SunI. Y. (2014). Reactive versus proactive attitudes toward domestic violence: A comparison of Taiwanese male and female police officers. Crime & Delinquency, 60(2), 216–237. http://doi.org/101177/0011128710372192
11.
*DejongC.Burguess-ProctorA.ElisL. (2008). Police officer perceptions of intimate partner violence: An analysis of observational data. Violence and Victims, 23, 683–697. http://doi.org/101891/0886-6708.23.6.683
12.
DurfeeA. (2012). Situational ambiguity and gendered patterns of arrest for intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212437017
13.
*DuttonL. B.TamborraT. L.PittmanM. (2019). Police officers’ and victim advocates’ perceptions of the lethality assessment program. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(7), 1023–1042. http://doi.org/101177/0887403417740187
14.
*EgelmanA.DeardorffJ. (2016). Cultural competence training for law enforcement responding to domestic violence emergencies with the deaf and hard of hearing: A mixed-methods evaluation. Health Promotion Practice, 17(2), 177–185. http://doi.org/101177/1524839915621538
15.
*EspinozaC. E.GarcíaG. (2018). Significados de género y sexualidad en la violencia de pareja: víctimas, agresores y policías en Hermosillo, Sonora [Meanings of gender and sexuality in partner violence: Victims, batterers and police officers in Hermosillo, Sonora]. Estudios Sociológicos, 30(108), 571–594. http://doi.org/1024201/es.2018v36n108.1602
16.
*FarrisE. M.HolmanM. R. (2015). Public officials and a “private” matter: Attitudes and policies in the county sheriff office regarding violence against women. Social Science Quarterly, 96(4), 1117–1135. http://doi.org/101111/ssqu.12182
17.
*FederL. (1997). Domestic violence and police response in a pro-arrest jurisdiction. Women and Criminal Justice, 8(4), 79–98. http://doi.org/101300/J012v08n04_04
18.
FedinaL.BackesB.JunH.DeVylderJ.BarthR. (2019). Police legitimacy, trustworthiness, and associations with intimate partner violence. Policing: An International Journal, 42(5), 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-04-2019-0046
19.
*FinnM. A.BettisP. (2006). Punitive action or gentle persuasion exploring police officers’ justifications for using dual arrest in domestic violence cases. Violence Against Women, 12(3), 268–287. http://doi.org/101177/1077801206286218.
20.
*FinnM. A.BlackwellL.StalansL. J.StuddardS.DuganL. (2004). Dual arrest decisions in domestic violence cases: The influence of departmental policies. Crime & Delinquency, 50(4), 565–589. http://doi.org/101177/0011128703261381
21.
*FinnM. A.StalansL. J. (1995). Police referrals to shelters and mental health treatment: Examining their decisions in domestic assault cases. Crime & Delinquency, 41(4), 467–480. http://doi.org/101177/0011128795041004006
22.
*FinnM. A.StalansL. J. (1997). The influence of gender and mental state on police decisions in domestic assault cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(2), 157–176. http://doi.org/101177/0093854897024002002
23.
*FinnM. A.StalansL. J. (2002). Police handling of the mentally ill in domestic violence situations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(3), 278–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854802029003003
24.
FloodM.PeaseB. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(2), 125–142. http://doi.org//10.1177/1524838009334131
25.
FoubertJ. D.PerryB. C. (2007). Creating lasting attitude and behavior change in fraternity members and male student athletes: The qualitative impact of an empathy-based rape prevention program. Violence Against Women, 13(1), 70–86. http://doi.org/101177/1077801206295125
GillC.CampbellM. A.BalluciD. (2019). Police officers’ definitions and understandings of intimate partner violence in New Brunswick, Canada. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 1–20. http://doi.org/101177/0032258X19876974
28.
*GölgeZ. B.SanalY.YavuzS.Arslanoglu-ÇetinE. (2016). Attitudes toward wife abuse of police officers and judiciary members in Turkey: Profession, gender, ambivalent sexism and sex roles. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 785–796. http://doi.org/101007/s10896-016-9823-1
29.
*GraciaE.GarcíaF.LilaM. (2011). Police attitudes towards policing partner violence against women: Do they correspond to different psychosocial profiles?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 189–207. http://doi.org/101177/0886260510362892
30.
*GraciaE.GarcíaF.LilaM. (2014). Male police officers’ law enforcement preferences in cases of intimate partner violence versus non-intimate interpersonal violence: Do sexist attitudes and empathy matter?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(10), 1195–1213. http://doi.org/101177/0093854814541655
31.
GraciaE.LilaM. (2015). Attitudes towards violence against women in the EU (Report prepared by ENEGE Network for the European Commission, DG Justice Unit D2). http://doi.org/102838/045438
32.
*GrantT. M.Cross-DennyB. (2017). Lethality assessment protocol: Police perceptions of a domestic violence intervention. Criminal Justice Review, 42(4), 384–399. http://doi.org/101177/0734016817699672
*HirschelJ. D.HutchisonI. W.DeanC. W.MillsA. M. (1992). Review essay on the law enforcement response to spouse abuse: Past, present, and future. Justice Quarterly, 9(2), 247–284. http://doi.org/101080/07418829200091361
35.
*HomeA. M. (1994). Attributing responsibility and assessing gravity in wife abuse situations: A comparative study of police and social workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 19(1–2), 67–85.
36.
*HorwitzS. H.MitchellD.LaRussa-TrottM.SantiagoL.PearsonJ.SkiffD. M.CerulliC. (2011). An inside view of police officers’ experience with domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 26(8), 617–625. http://doi.org/101007/s10896-011-9396-y
37.
*KuhnsIII. J. B.MaguireE. R.CoxS. M. (2007). Public-safety concerns among law enforcement agencies in suburban and rural America. Police Quarterly, 10(4), 429–454. http://doi.org/101177/1098611106289405
38.
*KulwickiA.AswadB.CarmonaT.BalloutS. (2010). Barriers in the utilization of domestic violence services among Arab immigrant women: Perceptions of professionals, service providers & community leaders. Journal of Family Violence, 25(8), 727–735. http://doi.org/101007/s10896-010-9330-8.
39.
*LaughonK.MitchellE.PriceJ. (2017). Provider perspectives on intimate partner violence in Bluefields, Nicaragua. Mental Health Nursing, 38(10), 852–857. http://doi.org/101080/01612840.2017.1346011
40.
*LeaS. J.LynnN. (2012). Dialogic reverberations: Police, domestic abuse, and the discontinuance of cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(15), 3091–3114. http://doi.org/101177/0886260512441075.
41.
*LeungL. (2014). It’s a matter of trust: Policing domestic violence in Hong Kong. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(1), 82–101. http://doi.org/101177/0886260513504645
42.
*LilaM.GraciaE.GarcíaF. (2013). Ambivalent sexism, empathy and law enforcement attitudes towards partner violence against women among male police officers. Psychology, Crime and Law, 19(10), 907–919. http://doi.org/101080/1068316X.2012.719619.
43.
*LockwoodD.ProhaskaA. (2015). Police officer gender and attitudes toward intimate partner violence: How policy can eliminate stereotypes. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 10(1), 77–90.
*MarkowitzF. E.WatsonA. M. (2015). Police response to domestic violence: Situations involving veterans exhibiting signs of mental illness. Criminology, 53(2), 231–252.
46.
*McPhedranS.GoverA. R.MazerolleP. (2017). A cross-national comparison of police attitudes about domestic violence: A focus on gender. Policing: An International Journal, 40, 214–227. http://doi.org/101108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0083
47.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.DouglasA. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Reprint—Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873–880. http://doi.org/101093/ptj/89.9.873
48.
*MuftićL. R.CruzeJ. R. (2014). The laws have changed, but what about the police? Policing domestic violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Violence Against Women, 20(6), 695–715. http://doi.org/101177/1077801214540539
49.
MurrayJ.FarringtonD. P.EisnerM. P. (2009). Drawing conclusions about causes from systematic reviews of risk factors: The Cambridge quality checklists. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 1–23. http://doi.org/101007/s11292-008-9066-0
50.
*PagelowM. D. (1992). Adult victims of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 87–120.
51.
PhillipsS. W.GillhamJ. (2010). Policing domestic violence: The significance of charging in the post-arrest decision making of police officers. Partner Abuse, 1(2), 200–219. http://doi.org/200-10.1891/1946–6560.1.2
52.
*PoteyenaM.SunI. Y. (2009). Gender differences in police officers’ attitudes: Assessing current empirical evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.07.011
53.
*RigakosG. (1995). Constructing the symbolic complainant: Police subculture and the nonenforcement of protection orders for battered women. Violence and Victims, 10(3), 227–247.
54.
*RigakosG. (1997). Situational determinants of police responses to civil and criminal injunctions for battered women. Violence Against Women, 3(2), 204–216. http://doi.org/101177/1077801297003002006
55.
RobinsonA. L. (2000). The effect of a domestic violence policy change on police officers’ schemata. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(5), 600–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854800027005004
56.
RobinsonA. L.ChandekM. (2000). Differential police response to black battered women. Women, Women & Criminal Justice, 12(2–3), 29–61. http://doi.org/101300/J012v12n02_04
57.
*RobinsonA. L.PinchevskyG. M.GuthrieJ. A. (2016). Under the radar: Policing non-violent domestic abuse in the US and UK. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 40(3), 195–208. http://doi.org/101080/01924036.2015.1114001
58.
*RobinsonA. L.PinchevskyG. M.GuthrieJ. A. (2018). A small constellation: Risk factors informing police perceptions of domestic abuse. Policing and Society, 28(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1151881
59.
RobinsonS. R.RaviK.Von SchragR. J. (2020). A systematic review of barriers to formal help seeking for adult survivors of IPV in the United States, 2005–2019. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1–17. http://doi.org/101177/1524838020916254
60.
*SaundersD. (1995). The tendency to arrest victims of domestic violence: A preliminary analysis of officer characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(2), 147–158. http://doi.org/101177/0886260595010002001
61.
SchreierM. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In FlickU. (Ed.), Qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–184). SAGE Publications.
62.
Serrano-MontillaC.LozanoL. M.BenderM.PadillaJ. L. (2020). Individualand societal risk factors of attitudes justifying intimate partner violence againstwomen: A multi-level cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 10(12), e037993. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037993
63.
*Shalhoub-KevorkianN. (2004). Racism, militarisation and policing: Police reactions to violence against Palestinian women in Israel. Social Identities, 10(2), 171–194. http://doi.org/101080/1350463042000227344
64.
*StalansL.FinnM. (1995). How novice and experienced officers interpret wife assaults: Normative and efficiency frames. Law & Society Review, 29(2), 287–321. http://doi.org/102307/3054013
65.
*StalansL.FinnM. (2000). Gender differences in officers’ perceptions and decisions about domestic violence cases. Women and Criminal Justice, 11(3), 1–2. http://doi.org/101300/J012v11n03_01
66.
*StalansL.FinnM. (2006). Public’s and police officers’ interpretation and handling of domestic violence cases: Divergent realities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1129–1155. http://doi.org/101177/0886260506290420
67.
*StithS. M. (1990). Police response to domestic violence: The influence of individual and familial factors. Violence and Victims, 5(1), 37–49.
68.
StöcklH.DevriesK.RotsteinA.AbrahamsN.CampbellJ.WattsC.GarciaC. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: A systematic review. The Lancet, 382, 859–865. http://doi.org/101016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2
69.
*SunI.ChuD. (2010). Who is better for handling domestic violence? A comparison between Taiwanese female and male officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 453–459. http://doi.org/101016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.014
70.
*TamS. Y.TangC. S. (2005). Comparing wife abuse perceptions between Chinese police officers and social workers. Journal of Family Violence, 20(1), 29–38. http://doi.org/101007/s10896-005-1507-1
71.
*TwisM. K.NguyenA. P.NordbergA. (2018). Intimate partner violence myths in police reports: A directed content analysis. Violence and Victims, 33(2), 351–367. http://doi.org/101891/0886-6708.VV-D-17-00015
72.
Van de VijverF.TanzerN. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004
73.
*Ward-LasherA.MessingJ. T.y HartB. (2017). Policing intimate partner violence: Attitudes toward risk assessment and collaboration with social workers. Social Work, 62(3), 211–218.
74.
*ZhaoR.ZhangH.JiangY.YaoX. (2018). The tendency to make arrests in domestic violence: Perceptions from police officers in China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(16), 4923–4941. http://doi.org/101177/0306624X18801653
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
