Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals are at increased risk for experiencing sexual violence. Bystander intervention training programs are a first-line prevention recommendation for reducing sexual and dating violence on college campuses. Little is known regarding the extent to which SGM individuals are represented in the content of bystander intervention programs or are included in studies examining the effectiveness of bystander intervention programs. The present critical review aimed to fill this gap in knowledge. Twenty-eight empirical peer-reviewed evaluations of bystander intervention programs aimed at reducing dating violence or sexual assault on college campuses were examined. Three studies (10.7%) described including content representing SGM individuals in the program. Personal communication with study authors indicated that—although not mentioned in the publication—many programs describe rates of violence among SGM students. When describing the study sample, six studies (21.4%) indicated that transgender, nonbinary, or students classified as “other” were included in the research. Approximately two thirds of studies (67.9%) did not describe participants’ sexual orientation. No studies reported outcomes specifically among SGM individuals, and two (7.1%) mentioned a lack of SGM inclusion as a study limitation. Work is needed to better represent SGM individuals in the content of bystander intervention programs and ensure adequate representation of SGM individuals in studies examining the effectiveness of bystander intervention programs.
*Alegría-FloresK.RakerK.PleasantsR. K.WeaverM. A.WeinbergerM. (2017). Preventing interpersonal violence on college campuses: The effect of one act training on bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(7), 1103–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515587666
2.
*AmarA. F.TuccinardiN.HeisleinJ.SimpsonS. (2015). Friends Helping Friends: A nonrandomized control trial of a peer-based response to dating violence. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2015.01.004
3.
American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. American Psychologist, 70(9), 832–864.
4.
American Psychological Association (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association: The official guide to APA style (7th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
AosvedA. C.LongP. J. (2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55(7-8), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4
6.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.CrossmanM. T. (2009). Reducing sexual violence on campus: The role of student leaders as empowered bystanders. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0083
7.
*BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20159
8.
BederaN.NordmeyerK. (2020). An inherently masculine practice: Understanding the sexual victimization of queer women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519898439
9.
BennettS.BanyardV. L.GarnhartL. (2014). To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(3), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505210
10.
BurnS. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5
11.
*CadaretM. C.JohnsonN. L.DevencenziM. L.MorganE. M. (2019). A quasiexperimental study of the Bystander Plus program for changing rape culture beliefs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519872981
12.
CannonC. (2015). Illusion of inclusion: The failure of the gender paradigm to account for intimate partner violence in LGBT relationships. Partner Abuse, 6(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.6.1.65
*CaresA. C.BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.WilliamsL. M.PotterS. J.StapletonJ. G. (2015). Changing attitudes about being a bystander to violence: Translating an in-person sexual violence prevention program to a new campus. Violence Against Women, 21(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214564681
15.
*CarlyleK. E.ConleyA. H.GuidryJ. P. (2020). Development and evaluation of the red flag campaign for the primary prevention of sexual and dating violence on college campuses. Journal of American College Health, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1726924
16.
CokerA. L.BushH. M.ClearE. R.BrancatoC. J.McCauleyH. L. (2020). Bystander program effectiveness to reduce violence and violence acceptance within sexual minority male and female high school students using a cluster RCT. Prevention Science, 21(3), 434–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01073-7
17.
CokerA. L.BushH. M.FisherB. S.SwanS. C.WilliamsC. M.ClearE. R.DeGueS. (2016). Multi-college bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.034
18.
*CokerA. L.Cook-CraigP. G.WilliamsC. M.FisherB. S.ClearE. R.GarciaL. S.HeggeL. M. (2011). Evaluation of Green Dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211410264
19.
*CokerA. L.FisherB. S.BushH. M.SwanS. C.WilliamsC. M.ClearE. R.DeGueS. (2015). Evaluation of the Green Dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Against Women, 21(12), 1507–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780121454284
20.
CoulterR. W.MairC.MillerE.BlosnichJ. R.MatthewsD. D.McCauleyH. L. (2017). Prevalence of past-year sexual assault victimization among undergraduate students: Exploring differences by and intersections of gender identity, sexual identity, and race/ethnicity. Prevention Science, 18, 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0762-8
21.
CoulterR. W.RankinS. R. (2020). College sexual assault and campus climate for sexual-and gender-minority undergraduate students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(5-6), 1351–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517696870
22.
DeGueS.ValleL. A.HoltM. K.MassettiG. M.MatjaskoJ. L.TharpA. T. (2014). A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004
23.
DesselA. B.GoodmanK. D.WoodfordM. R. (2017). LGBT discrimination on campus and heterosexual bystanders: Understanding intentions to intervene. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000015
24.
EdwardsK. M.SylaskaK. M.BarryJ. E.MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.CohnE. S.WalshW. A.WardS. K. (2015). Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: A comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(4), 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514535260
25.
*Elias-LambertN.BlackB. M. (2016). Bystander sexual violence prevention program: Outcomes for high-and low-risk university men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(19), 3211–3235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584346
26.
EspelageD. L.BasileK. C.LeemisR. W.HippT. N.DavisJ. P. (2018). Longitudinal examination of the bullying-sexual violence pathway across early to late adolescence: Implicating homophobic name-calling. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(9), 1880–1893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0827-4
27.
EtikanI.MusaS. A.AlkassimR. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
28.
*Exner-CortensD.CummingsN. (2017). Bystander-based sexual violence prevention with college athletes: A pilot randomized trial. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517733279
29.
FordT. M.Liwag-McLambM. G.FoleyL. A. (1998). Perceptions of rape based on sex and sexual orientation of victim. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(2), 253–263.
30.
*FoubertJ. D. (2000). The longitudinal effects of a rape-prevention program on fraternity men’s attitudes, behavioral intent, and behavior. Journal of American College Health, 48(4), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448480009595691
FraserG. (2018). Evaluating inclusive gender identity measures for use in quantitative psychological research. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(4), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1497693
33.
*GidyczC. A.OrchowskiL. M.BerkowitzA. D. (2011). Preventing sexual aggression among college men: An evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 720–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211409727
34.
JohnsonN. L.GroveM. (2017). Why us? Toward an understanding of bisexual women’s vulnerability for and negative consequences of sexual violence. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2017.1364201
35.
JordanS. P.MehrotraG. R.FujikawaK. A. (2020). Mandating inclusion: Critical trans perspectives on domestic and sexual violence advocacy. Violence Against Women, 26(6-7), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219836728
36.
JourilesE. N.KraussA.VuN. L.BanyardV. L.McDonaldR. (2018). Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431906
37.
*JourilesE. N.McDonaldR.RosenfieldD.LevyN.SargentK.CaiozzoC.GrychJ. H. (2016). TakeCARE, a video bystander program to help prevent sexual violence on college campuses: Results of two randomized, controlled trials. Psychology of Violence, 6(3), 410. https://doi.org/10.1037/vo0000016
38.
KatzJ.HeisterkampH. A.FlemingW. M. (2011). The social justice roots of the mentors in violence prevention model and its application in a high school setting. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 684–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211409725
39.
*KatzJ.OlinR.HermanC.DuBoisM. (2013). Spotting the signs: First-year college students’ responses to bystander-themed rape prevention posters. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(4), 523–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21552
40.
*KleinsasserA.JourilesE. N.McDonaldR.RosenfieldD. (2015). An online bystander intervention program for the prevention of sexual violence. Psychology of Violence, 5(3), 227. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037393
41.
KrebsC. P.LindquistC.BerzofskyM.Shook-SaB.PetersonK.PlantyM.LangtonL.Widico-StroopJ. (2016). Campus climate survey validation study final technical report. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ccsvsftr.pdf
42.
*Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.FoubertJ. D.BrasfieldH. M.HillB.Shelley-TremblayS. (2011). The men’s program: Does it impact college men’s self-reported bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene?Violence Against Women, 17(6), 743–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211409728
43.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026570
44.
LevineM.ManningR. (2013). Social identity, group processes, and helping in emergencies. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.892318
45.
LevineM.ProsserA.EvansD.ReicherS. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271651
46.
McCauleyH. L.CampbellR.BuchananN. T.MoylanC. A. (2019). Advancing theory, methods, and dissemination in sexual violence research to build a more equitable future: An intersectional, community-engaged approach. Violence Against Women, 25(16), 1906–1931. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219875823
47.
McMahonS.BanyardV. L. (2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011426015
*MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.ArnoldJ. S.EcksteinR. P.StapletonJ. G. (2010). Engaging intercollegiate athletes in preventing and intervening in sexual and intimate partner violence. Journal of American College Health, 59(3), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.502195
50.
*MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.ArnoldJ. S.EcksteinR. P.StapletonJ. G. (2011). Sisterhood may be powerful for reducing sexual and intimate partner violence: An evaluation of the bringing in the bystander in-person program with sorority members. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 703–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211409726
51.
*MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.CaresA. C.PotterS. J.WilliamsL. M.StapletonJ. G. (2015). Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: What program effects remain 1 year later?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(1), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514532719
52.
MujalG. N.TaylorM. E.FryJ. L.Gochez-KerrT. H.WeaverN. L. (2019). A systematic review of bystander interventions for the prevention of sexual violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849587
53.
*O’BrienK. M.SauberE. W.KearneyM. S.VenagliaR. B.LemayE. P.Jr (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of an online intervention to educate college students about dating violence and bystander responses. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519829769
54.
OrchowskiL. M.BarnettN. P.BerkowitzA.BorsariB.OesterleD.ZlotnickC. (2018). Sexual assault prevention for heavy drinking college men: Development and feasibility of an integrated approach. Violence Against Women, 24(11), 1369–1396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218787928
55.
OrchowskiL. M.EdwardsK. M.HollanderJ. A.BanyardV. L.SennC. Y.GidyczC. A. (2020). Integrating sexual assault resistance, bystander, and men’s social norms strategies to prevent sexual violence on college campuses: A call to action. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(4), 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018789153
56.
Palm ReedK. M.HinesD. A.ArmstrongJ. L.CameronA. Y. (2015). Experimental evaluation of a bystander prevention program for sexual assault and dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037557
57.
PatchettE.FosterJ. (2015). Inclusive recreation: The state of campus policies, facilities, trainings, and programs for transgender participants. Recreational Sports Journal, 39(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1123/rsj.2015-0028
58.
*PetersonK.SharpsP.BanyardV.PowersR. A.KaukinenC.GrossD.DeckerM. R.BaatzC.CampbellJ. (2018). An evaluation of two dating violence prevention programs on a college campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(23), 3630–3655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516636069
59.
*PotterS. J.FlanaganM.SeidmanM.HodgesH.StapletonJ. G. (2019). Developing and piloting videogames to increase college and university students’ awareness and efficacy of the bystander role in incidents of sexual violence. Games for Health Journal, 8(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2017.0172
60.
PotterS. J.FountainK.StapletonJ. G. (2012). Addressing sexual and relationship violence in the LGBT community using a bystander framework. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 20(4), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229.2012.712838
61.
*PotterS. J.MoynihanM. M.StapletonJ. G. (2011). Using social self-identification in social marketing materials aimed at reducing violence against women on campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(5), 971–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510365870
62.
*PotterS. J.MoynihanM. M.StapletonJ. G.BanyardV. L. (2009). Empowering bystanders to prevent campus violence against women: A preliminary evaluation of a poster campaign. Violence Against Women, 15(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208327482
63.
*SalazarL. F.Vivolo-KantorA.HardinJ.BerkowitzA. (2014). A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(9), e203. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3426
64.
*SalazarL. F.Vivolo-KantorA.Schipani-McLaughlinA. M. (2019). Theoretical mediators of RealConsent: A web-based sexual violence prevention and bystander education program. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118779126
65.
*SennC. Y.ForrestA. (2016). “And then one night when I went to class…”: The impact of sexual assault bystander intervention workshops incorporated in academic courses. Psychology of Violence, 6(4), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039660
66.
VaughanR. (2017). Oversampling in health surveys: Why, when, and how?American Journal of Public Health, 107(8), 1214–1215. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303895
67.
WakelinA.LongK. M. (2003). Effects of victim gender and sexuality on attributions of blame to rape victims. Sex Roles, 49(9), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102587652202
68.
WernickL. J.KulickA.InglehartM. H. (2013). Factors predicting student intervention when witnessing anti-LGBTQ harassment: The influence of peers, teachers, and climate. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(2), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.003
