Theories play an important role in guiding intimate partner homicide (IPH) prevention research and practice. This study is the first systematic review of theories employed to explain why someone might kill their intimate partner. This review used rigorous methods to locate and synthesize literature that described explanatory theories of IPH perpetration. Using set search terms, we systematically searched 15 databases and repositories for theory-focused documents (i.e., theory papers or analyses) published in English from 2003 to 2018. Eighteen documents met these inclusion criteria and identified 22 individual theories that seek to explain why people might kill their intimate partners. These theories fell within four broader theoretical perspectives: feminist, evolutionary, sociological/criminological, and combined. Key tenets and focal populations of these 22 theories were identified and organized into a compendium of explanatory theories of IPH perpetration. Potential strengths and limitations of each of the four perspectives were described. Review findings underscored the likely importance of addressing gender as well as risk and protective factors at all levels of the social ecological model in efforts to understand IPH perpetration. The review findings highlighted the need for both integrated theories and a broader conceptual organizing framework to guide work aimed at IPH perpetration prevention to leverage the strengths of disparate theoretical perspectives. With the goal of informing future research, a preliminary iteration of such a framework is presented.
AllenT.SalariS.BucknerG. (2020). Homicide illustrated across the ages: Graphic depictions of victim and offender age, sex, and relationship. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(3–4), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264318812347
2.
BelknapJ.LarsonD. L.AbramsM. L.GarciaC.Anderson-BlockK. (2012). Types of intimate partner homicides committed by women: Self-defense, proxy/retaliation, and sexual proprietariness. Homicide Studies, 16(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767912461444
3.
BeyerK.WallisA. B.HambergerL. K. (2015). Neighborhood environment and intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(1), 16–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013515758
4.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.ChenJ.StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513.
6.
BrowningC. R. (2002). The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage & Family, 64, 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00833.x
7.
CamanS.KristianssonM.GranathS.SturupJ. (2017). Trends in rates and characteristics of intimate partner homicides between 1990 and 2013. Journal of Criminal Justice, 49, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.01.002
CampbellJ. C. (1992). If I can’t have you, no one can. In RadfordJ.RussellD. E. (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of woman killing (pp. 99–113). Twayne.
10.
CampbellJ. C.GlassN.SharpsP. W.LaughonK.BloomT. (2007). Intimate partner homicide: Review and implications of research and policy. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(3), 246–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007303505
11.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD.Koziol-McLainJ.BlockC. R.CampbellD.CurryM. A.GaryF.McFarlaneJ.SachsC.SharpsP.UlrichY.WiltS. A.ManganelloJ.XuX.SchollenbergerJ.FryeV.LaughonK. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multi-site case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.7.1089
CooperA.SmithE. L. (2011). Homicide trends in the United States, 1980–2008(NCJ 236018). Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf
15.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
DawsonM.PiscitelliA. (2017). Risk factors in domestic homicides: Identifying common clusters in the Canadian context. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517729404
18.
DawsonM.SuttonD.JaffeP.StraatmanA.PoonJ.GosseM.PetersO.SandhuG. (2018). One is too many: Trends and patterns in domestic homicides in Canada 2010–2015. Canadian Domestic Homicide Prevention Initiative with Vulnerable Populations. http://cdhpi.ca/sites/cdhpi.ca/files/CDHPI-REPORTRV.pdf
19.
DíezC.KurlandR. P.RothmanE. F.Bair-MerrittM.FleeglerE.XuanZ.GaleaS.RossC. S.KalesanB.SiegelM. (2017). State intimate partner violence–related firearm laws and intimate partner homicide rates in the United States, 1991 to 2015. Annals of Internal Medicine, 167(8), 536–543. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2849
ElliottD. S.AgetonS. S.CanterR. J. (1979). An integrated theoretical perspective on delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 16(1), 3–27.
*ErikssonL.MazerolleP. (2013). A general strain theory of intimate partner homicide. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(5), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.002
FraserM. W.RichmanJ. M.GalinskyM. J.DayS. H. (2009). Intervention research: Developing social programs. Oxford University Press.
26.
FridelE. E.FoxJ. A. (2019). Gender differences in patterns and trends in US homicide, 1976–2017. Violence and Gender, 6(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0016
27.
GayB.WeaverS. (2011). Theory building and paradigms: A primer on the nuances of theory construction. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(2), 24–32.
28.
GillespieL. K.ReckdenwaldA. (2017). Gender equality, place, and female-victim intimate partner homicide: A county-level analysis in North Carolina. Feminist Criminology, 12(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085115620479
29.
*GoetzA. T.ShackelfordT. K.RomeroG. A.KaighobadiF.MinerE. J. (2008). Punishment, proprietariness, and paternity: Men’s violence against women from an evolutionary perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(6), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.004
30.
GollubE. L.GardnerM. (2019). Firearm legislation and firearm use in female intimate partner homicide using national violent death reporting system data. Preventive Medicine, 118, 216–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.11.007
31.
*GregorattoF. (2017). Why love kills: power, gender dichotomy, and romantic femicide. Hypatia, 32(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12308
32.
HambyS.GrychJ. (2013). The web of violence: Exploring connections among different forms of interpersonal violence and abuse. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5596-3
33.
*HarperS. B. (2017). No way out: Severely abused Latina women, patriarchal terrorism, and self-help homicide. Feminist Criminology, 12(3), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116680743
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.LangC.CormierC. A.LinesK. J. (2004). A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario domestic assault risk assessment. Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 267.
37.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
38.
JackS. P. D.PetroskyE.LyonsB. H.BlairJ. M.ErtlA. M.SheatsK. J.BetzC. J. (2018). Surveillance for violent deaths: National violent death reporting system, 27 states, 2015. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 67, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6711a1
39.
*JohnsonH. (2012). When feminism meets evolutionary psychology: The enduring legacy of Margo Wilson. Homicide Studies, 16(4), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767912457169
40.
*JohnsonN. J. (2013). Intimate partner homicide rates in Chicago, 1988–1992: A modified general strain theory approach[Doctoral dissertation]. University of North Texas.
41.
*KaighobadiF.ShackelfordT. K.GoetzA. T. (2009). From mate retention to murder: Evolutionary psychological perspectives on men’s partner-directed violence. Review of General Psychology, 13(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017254
42.
KellyU. A. (2011). Theories of intimate partner violence: From blaming the victim to acting against injustice-intersectionality as an analytic framework. Advances in Nursing Science, 34(3), E29–E51. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e3182272388
43.
*KirklandA. (2013). Rurality and intimate partner homicide: Exploring the relationship between place, social structure, and femicide in North Carolina[Doctoral dissertation]. University of South Florida.
44.
MadkourA. S.MartinS. L.HalpernC. T.SchoenbachV. J. (2010). Area disadvantage and intimate partner homicide: An ecological analysis of North Carolina counties, 2004-2006. Violence and Victims, 25, 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.363
45.
*MesserschmidtJ. W. (2017). Masculinities and femicide. Qualitative Sociology Review, 13(3), 70–79.
46.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
NationM.CrustoC.WandersmanA.KumpferK. L.SeyboltD.Morrissey-KaneE.DavinoK. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58(6–7), 449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.449
49.
PetroskyE.BlairJ. M.BetzC. J.FowlerK. A.JackS. P.LyonsB. H. (2017). Racial and ethnic differences in homicides of adult women and the role of intimate partner violence—United States, 2003–2014. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(28), 741. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6628a1
50.
PuzoneC. A.SaltzmanL. E.KresnowM. J.ThompsonM. P.MercyJ. A. (2000). National trends in intimate partner homicide: United States, 1976–1995. Violence Against Women, 6(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010022181912
51.
*ReckdenwaldA. (2008). Examining changes in male and female intimate partner homicide over time, 1990–2000[Doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida.
52.
ReckdenwaldA.ParkerK. F. (2012). Understanding the change in male and female intimate partner homicide over time: A policy-and theory-relevant investigation. Feminist Criminology, 7(3), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111428445
53.
SabinaC.SwattM. (2015). Summary report: Latino intimate partner homicide(Report No. 2013-IJ-CX-0037). National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/248887.pdf
54.
*SacraS. (2018). Domestic stalking, violation of protective orders, and homicide in Chicago: The influence of social disorganization and gender inequality[Doctoral dissertation]. University of Central Florida.
55.
*SebireJ. A. (2013). Love and lethal violence: An analysis of intimate partner homicides committed in London 1998–2009[Doctoral dissertation]. University of Leicester.
56.
*SerranG.FirestoneP. (2004). Intimate partner homicide: A review of the male proprietariness and the self-defense theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(02)00107-6
57.
SpencerC. M.StithS. M. (2018). Risk factors for male perpetration and female victimization of intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018781101
58.
StöcklH.DevriesK.RotsteinA.AbrahamsN.CampbellJ.WattsC.MorenoC. G. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: A systematic review. The Lancet, 382(9895), 859–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2
*Van HorneS. L. (2010). The importance of place: A national examination of the structural correlates of intimate partner homicides[Doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University-Newark.
62.
VoithL. A. (2017). Understanding the relation between neighborhoods and intimate partner violence: An integrative review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org//10.1177/1524838017717744
63.
WardT.HudsonS. M. (1998). The construction and development of theory in the sexual offending area: A metatheoretical framework. Sexual Abuse, 10(1), 47–63.
64.
WebsdaleN. (2003). Reviewing domestic violence deaths. National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 26–31.
WilkinsN.TsaoB.HertzM.DavisR.KlevensJ. (2014). Connecting the dots: An overview of the links among multiple forms of violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/connecting_the_dots-a.pdf
67.
WilsonM.DalyM. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8, 3–16.
