The significant role of the community in the lives of children and youth at-risk has become increasingly clear to social work academics and professionals over the last three decades. Alongside the more traditional individual and family responses, community interventions have been designed to catalyze change in the environment of children and youth at-risk and supply holistic and sustainable responses to their needs. Ten such community intervention programs were identified from the United States, Australia, Canada, and Israel. Most employed the community development model, focused on developing leadership and social capital (improving community networking) and advancing coordination between the organizations and sectors in the field of risk among children and youth. The diverse programs reviewed focused both on at-risk children and youth in general or specifically on child abuse and neglect. The programs originated from different health, education, and welfare disciplines and sponsoring authorities. The majority were funded originally by private foundations; however, government involvement was significant, particularly in the adoption and support of initiatives after their development. The current analysis of the programs refers to core issues that arose from the review: professional orientation, main target unit, main initiator, and research and evaluation. Analysis of program characteristics enables identifying relevant aspects of these programs for use by policy, governmental, and nonprofit sector stakeholders seeking to develop similar programs. Conclusions and recommendations to advance the field are suggested considering the current context of government cuts in welfare funds.
AusposP. (2012). Using neighborhood survey data to understand neighborhoods and improve practice in comprehensive place-based change efforts. Aspen Institute.
2.
BarryF. (1994). A neighborhood-based approach: What is it? In MeltonG.BarryF. (Eds.), Protecting children from abuse and neglect: Foundations for a new national strategy (pp. 14–39). Guilford Press.
3.
BarthR. P.LeeB. R.LindseyM. A.CollinsK. S.StriederF.ChorpitaB. F.BeckerK. D.SparksJ. A. (2012). Evidence-based practice at a crossroads: The timely emergence of common elements and common factors. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(1), 108–119.
4.
BrennanM. A. (2008). Conceptualizing resiliency: An interactional perspective for community and youth development. Child Care in Practice, 14(1), 55–64.
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage.
7.
BurnsT.BrownP.ColomboM. (2017). Kids matter here, an analytic review of the 10-year good neighborhoods initiative. Skillman Foundation Analytic Review.
8.
CatalanoR. F.HaggertyK. P.HawkinsJ. D. (2012). Communities that care returns $5.30 per dollar invested by preventing youth tobacco use and delinquency. Research Brief, Social Development Research Group.
9.
ChorpitaB. F.DaleidenE. L.WeiszJ. R. (2005). Identifying and selecting the common elements of evidence based interventions: A distillation and matching model. Mental Health Services Research, 7(1), 5–20.
10.
CorsaroN.McGarrellE. F. (2010). Reducing homicide risk in Indianapolis between 1997 and 2000. Journal of Urban Health, 87(5), 851–864.
11.
CoultonC. J.CramptonD. S.IrwinM.SpilsburyJ. C.KorbinJ. E. (2007). How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment: A review of the literature and alternative pathways. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(11), 1117–1142.
12.
CoultonC. J.KorbinJ. E.SuM. (1999). Neighborhoods and child maltreatment: A multi-level study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(11), 1019–1040.
13.
CoultonC. J.KorbinJ. E.SuM.ChowJ. (1995). Community level factors and child maltreatment rates. Child Development, 66(5), 1262–1276.
14.
DaroD.BuddeS.BakerS.NesmithA.HardenA. (2005). Community partnerships for protecting children: Phase II outcome evaluation. Chapin Hall Publications.
15.
DaroD.DodgeK. A. (2009). Creating community responsibility for child protection: Possibilities and challenges. The Future of Children/Center for the Future of Children, The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 19(2), 67.
16.
DaroD.HuangL. A.EnglishB. (2009). The Duke Endowment Child Abuse Prevention Initiative: Durham Family Initiative Implementation Report. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
DaviesK.GrayM.WebbS. A. (2014). Putting the parity into service-user participation: an integrated model of social justice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23(2), 119–127.
19.
DobbieW.FryerR. G. (2010). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem children’s zone. Department of Economics, Harvard University.
20.
DodgeK. A.BerlinL. J.EpsteinM.Spitz-RothA.O’DonnellK.KaufmanM.Amaya-JacksonL.RoschJ.ChristopoulosC. (2004). The Durham family initiative: A preventive system of care. Child Welfare, 83(2), 109–128.
21.
DunnC. L. M. (2010). The Harlem children’s zone: A literature review of programs and practices[Master’s thesis]. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.
22.
FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J.LynskeyM. T. (1997). Childhood sexual abuse, adolescent sexual behaviors and sexual revictimization. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21(8), 789–803.
23.
FeinbergM. E.GreenbergM. T.OsgoodD. W. (2004). Readiness, functioning, and perceived effectiveness in community prevention coalitions: A study of communities that care. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 163–176.
24.
FinkelhorD.TurnerH.OrmrodR.HambyS. L. (2010). Trends in childhood violence and abuse exposure: evidence from 2 national surveys. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(3), 238–242.
25.
FisherC. B.LernerR. M. (2004). Encyclopedia of applied developmental science. SAGE Publications.
26.
FreisthlerB.Maguire-JackK. (2015). Understanding the interplay between neighborhood structural factors, social processes, and alcohol outlets on child physical abuse. Child Maltreatment, 20, 268–277.
GantL. M.HollingsworthL.MillerP. L. (2017). A twenty first century approach to community change. Oxford University Press.
30.
GarbarinoJ.KostelnyK. (1992). Child maltreatment as a community problem. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 455–464.
31.
GarbarinoJ.ShermanD. (1980). High-risk neighborhoods and high-risk families: The human ecology of child maltreatment. Child Development, 51, 188–198.
32.
GloppenK. M.ArthurM. W.HawkinsJ. D.ShapiroV. B. (2012). Sustainability of the communities that care prevention system by coalitions participating in the community youth development study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(3), 259–264.
33.
GwinnerK. (2013). Listening, hearing and drawing things together to work on solutions: NAPCAN play a part, Queensland, 2010–2013 evaluation research report. NAPCAN Queensland.
34.
HansonD. (2013). Assessing the Harlem children’s zone. The Heritage Foundation.
35.
HareI. (2004). Defining social work for the 21st century: The International federation of social workers’ revised definition of social work. International Social Work, 47(3), 407–424.
HashimaP. Y.MeltonG. B. (2008). “I can conquer a mountain”: Ordinary people who provide extraordinary community service. Family & Community Health: The Journal of Health Promotion & Maintenance, 31(2), 162–172.
38.
Haski-LeventhalD.Ben-AriehA.MeltonG. B. (2008). Between neighborliness and volunteerism: Participants in the strong communities initiative. Family & Community Health, 31(2), 150–161.
39.
HawkinsJ. D.OesterleS.BrownE. C.MonahanK. C.AbbottR. D.ArthurM. W.CatalanoR. F. (2012). Sustained decreases in risk exposure and youth problem behaviors after installation of the communities that care prevention system in a randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166(2), 141–148.
40.
HeinrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The Weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
41.
KimB.Maguire-JackK. (2015). Community interaction and child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 41, 146–157.
42.
KondratM. E. (2002). Actor-centered social work re-visioning “person-in-environment” through a critical theory lens. Social Work, 47, 435–448.
43.
KubischA.AusposP.BrownP.BuckE.DewarT. (2011). Voices from the field III: Lessons and challenges for foundations based on two decades of community-change efforts. The Foundation Review, 3(1), 12.
44.
Maguire-JackK.ShowalterK. (2016). The protective effect of neighborhood social cohesion in child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 52, 29–37.
45.
McDonellJ. R.Ben-AriehA.MeltonG. B. (2015). Strong communities for children: results of a multi-year community-based initiative to protect children from harm. Child Abuse & Neglect, 41, 79–96.
46.
McleighJ. D.KatzC.Davidson-AradB.Ben-AriehA. (2015a). The cultural adaptation of a community-based child maltreatment prevention initiative. Family Process, 2, 1–15.
47.
McleighJ. D.MeltonG. BKimbrough-MeltonR.WallaceN. (2015b). How can strong communities transform community norms and structures to promote children’s safety and well-being? (White paper). Upbring Publications.
48.
MiktonC.ButchartA. (2009). Child maltreatment prevention: A systematic review of reviews. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87, 353–361.
49.
MolnarB. E.BeatrizE. D.BeardsleeW. R. (2016). Community-level approaches to child maltreatment prevention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(4), 387–397.
50.
MolnarB. E.BukaS. L.BrennanR. T.HoltonJ. K.EarlsF. (2003). A multilevel study of neighborhoods and parent-to child physical aggression: Results from the project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods. Child Maltreatment, 8, 84–97.
51.
MorenoffJ. D.SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–558.
52.
LuM.MoritzS.LorenzettiD.SykesL.StrausS.QuanH. (2012). A systematic review of interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Asian women. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 413.
NehemiahB. A.LeviA. (2016). Strong communities for safe children. Tel-Aviv University, Social Work Department. (Hebrew)
55.
NicholasS. W.Jean-LouisB.OrtizB.NorthridgeM.ShoemakerK.VaughanR.RomeM.CanadaG.HutchinsonV. (2005). Addressing the childhood asthma crisis in Harlem: The Harlem children’s zone asthma initiative. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 245–249.
56.
OesterleS.KuklinskiM. R.HawkinsJ. D.SkinnerM. L.GuttmannovaK.RhewI. C. (2018). Long-term effects of the communities that care trial on substance use, antisocial behavior, and violence through age 21 years. American Journal of Public Health, 108(5), 659–665.
PancerS. M.NelsonG.HasfordJ.LoomisC. (2013). The better beginnings, better futures project: Long-term parent, family, and community outcomes of a universal, comprehensive, community-based prevention approach for primary school children and their families. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 187–205.
59.
PetersR. D.BradshawA. J.PetrunkaK.NelsonG.HerryY.CraigW. M.ArnoldR.ParkerK. C.KhanS. R.HochJ. S.PancerS. M.LoomisC.BélangerJ. M.EversS.MaltaisC.ThompsonK.RossiterM. D. (2010). The better beginnings, better futures project: Findings from grade 3 to grade 9. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 75(3), vii–viii, 1–174.
60.
PetersR. D.PetrunkaK.KhanS.Howell-MonetaA.NelsonG.PancerS. M.LoomisC. (2016). Cost-savings analysis of the better beginnings, better futures community-based project for young children and their families: A 10-year follow-up. Prevention Science, 17, 237–247.
61.
PreskillH.MackK.DuffyM.GutiérrezM. (2013). The California endowment strategic review: Building healthy communities. FSG.
62.
ProutA.JamesA. (2005). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood. Childhood: Critical Concepts in Sociology, 1, 7–33.
63.
PutnamR. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.
64.
QvortrupJ. (2002). Sociology of childhood: Conceptual liberation of children. In FlemmingM.QvortrupJ. (Eds.), Childhood and children’s culture. University Press of Southern Denmark.
65.
RaudenbushS. W.SampsonR. J. (1999). Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology, 29(1), 1–41.
66.
RhewI. C.HawkinsJ. D.MurrayD. M.FaganA. A.OesterleS.AbbottR. D.CatalanoR. F. (2016). Evaluation of community-level effects of communities that care on adolescent drug use and delinquency using a repeated cross-sectional design. Prevention Science, 17(2), 177–187.
67.
RothmanJ. (2007). Multi modes of intervention at the macro level. Journal of Community Practice, 15(4), 11–40.
68.
SampsonR. J. (2003). The neighborhood context of well-being. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(3), S53–S64.
69.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
70.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.”Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(4), 319–342.
71.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
72.
SchmidH. (2006). The public commission report on the state of children and youth at risk and distress. The Israeli Government.
73.
ShapiroV. B.HawkinsJ. D.OesterleS. (2015). Building local infrastructure for community adoption of science-based prevention: The role of coalition functioning. Prevention Science, 16, 1136–1146.
74.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. University of Chicago Press.
75.
SmithC.ThornberryT. P. (1995). The relationship between childhood maltreatment and adolescent involvement in delinquency. Criminology, 33(4), 451–481.
76.
SomechS.Almog-ZakenA.Ben-RabiD. (2018). Creating community resilience to improve the well-being of children and youth in disadvantaged neighborhoods in Israel. Brookdale Institute.
77.
SomechS.AlfasiY.Ben-RabiD. (2014). First preliminary report—Finding from secondary report of better together program. Brookdale Institute. (Hebrew).
The Center for Community Partnerships in Child Welfare. (2006). Community partnerships for protecting children. Lessons, opportunities, and challenges (A report to the field). The Center for Community Partnerships in Child Welfare.
81.
U.S. National Research Council. (1993). Understanding child abuse and neglect. National Academy Press.
82.
WeilM.GambleD. N. (2005). Evolution, models, and the changing context of community practice. In The handbook of community practice (pp. 117–152). Sage.
83.
WilsonN.MinklerM.DashoS.WallersteinN.MartinA. C. (2008). Getting to social action: The youth empowerment strategies (YES!) project. Health Promotion Practice, 9(4), 395–403.
84.
WilsonH. W.WidomC. S. (2010). The role of youth problem behaviors in the path from child abuse and neglect to prostitution: A prospective examination. Journal of Research on Adolescence: The Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 210–236.
85.
WortonS. K.CaplanR.NelsonG.PancerS. M.LoomisC.PetersR. D.HaywardK. (2014). Better beginnings, better futures: Theory, research, and knowledge transfer of a community-based initiative for children and families. Psychosocial Intervention, 23, 135–143.
