The prevalence of sexual perpetration in college men is unknown. Prior reviews of sexual violence prevalence rates have produced wide-ranging estimates, likely due to wide variation in measurement strategies.
Objectives:
This article systematically reviewed research findings (from 2000 to 2017) regarding prevalence rates of sexual perpetration in college men and measurement strategies. Data Sources: PsycINFO and Web of Science databases. Eligibility Criteria: Empirical reports published between 2000 and 2017 that included male participants, available in English, and reported lifetime prevalence findings in Canadian or American college students. Participants: Data from 78 independent samples including 25,524 college men.
Results:
The average prevalence rate of any sexual perpetration was 29.3% (SD = 16.8), and the average rate of rape was 6.5% (SD = 6.3). Studies that used non-Sexual Experiences Survey (SES)–based questionnaires recorded higher prevalence rates (41.5%) than SES-using studies (26.2%). At least 16 different sexual perpetration questionnaires were identified. Modifying standardized questionnaires was extremely common; this was reported in over half of the studies. Studies using modified standardized questionnaires found higher prevalence rates of sexual perpetration than studies using nonmodified standardized questionnaires.
Limitations:
This report focused exclusively on college men in the United States and Canada.
Conclusions and Implications:
On average, 29% of college males report engaging in behaviors defined as sexual perpetration; however, there was a strong influence of measurement strategy on reported rates.
AbbeyA. (2005). Lessons learned and unanswered questions about sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 39–42.
2.
AbbeyA.ParkhillM. R.KossM. P. (2005). The effects of frame of reference on responses to questions about sexual assault victimization and perpetration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 364–373. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00236.x
3.
AmbroseC. E.GrossA. M. (2016). Interpreting sexual dating encounters: Social information processing differences in men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 361–370. doi:10.1007/s10896-015-9757-z
4.
AndersonR. E.CahillS. P.DelahantyD. L. (2017). Initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the sexual experience survey-short form perpetration (SES-SFP) in college men. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma. doi:10.1080/10926771.2017.1330296
5.
AndersonR. E.CahillS. P.DelahantyD. L. (2018). Discordance between the sexual experiences surveys-short forms and the revised conflict tactics scales in college men. Psychology of Violence. doi:10.1037/vio0000199
6.
AndersonR. E. (2019), Dataset: The Frequency of Sexual Perpetration in College Men, Reported Prevalence Rates from 2000-2017. Mendeley Data, v1. http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/fy2352pn3r.1
7.
AnthonyE. R.CookS. L. (2012). Assessing the impact of gender-neutral language on disclosure of sexual violence. Psychology of Violence, 2, 297–307. doi:10.1037/a0028562
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS.WaltersM. L.MerrickM.…StevensM. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
10.
BouffardL.GoodsonA. (2017). Sexual coercion, sexual aggression, or sexual assault: How measurement impacts our understanding of sexual violence. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 9, 269–278.
11.
BreidingM. J.BasileK. C.SmithS.BlackM. C.MahendraR. (2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements, version 2.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
12.
BudayS. K.PetersonZ. D. (2015). Men’s and women’s interpretation and endorsement of items measuring self-reported heterosexual aggression. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 1042–1053. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.967373
CantorD.FisherB.ChibnallS.TownsendR.LeeH.BruceC.…IncW. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Washington, DC. doi:10.1016/j.aqpro.2013.07.003
15.
CookS. L.GidyczC. A.KossM. P.MurphyM. (2011). Emerging issues in the measurement of rape victimization. Violence Against Women, 17, 2012–2018. doi:10.1177/1077801210397741
DavisK. C.GilmoreA. K.StappenbeckC. A.BalsanM. J.GeorgeW. H.NorrisJ. (2014). How to score the sexual experiences survey? A comparison of nine methods. Psychology of Violence, 4, 445–461. doi:10.1037/a0037494
FedinaL.HolmesJ. L.BackesB. L. (2018). Campus sexual assault: A systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19, 76–93. doi:10.1177/1524838016631129
20.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
GidyczC. A. (2011). Sexual revictimization revisited: A commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 355–361.
22.
HambyS. (2014). Intimate partner and sexual violence research: Scientific progress, scientific challenges, and gender. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. doi:10.1177/1524838014520723
23.
HambyS.SugarmanD. B.Boney-McCoyS. (2006). Does questionnaire format impact reported partner violence rates? An experimental study. Violence and Victims, 21, 507–518. doi:10.1891/vivi.21.4.507
24.
HambyT.IckesW. (2015). Do the readability and average item length of personality scales affect their reliability? Some meta-analytic answers. Journal of Individual Differences, 36, 54–63. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000154
25.
HambyS. L.KossM. P. (2003). Shades of gray: A qualitative study of terms used in the measurement of sexual victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 243–255. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00104
26.
JohnsonS. M.MurphyM. J.GidyczC. A. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Experiences Survey–Short Forms victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 32, 78–92. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00110
27.
KilpatrickD. G.ResnickH. S.RuggieroK. J.ConoscentiL. M.McCauleyJ. (2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study. Charleston: Medical University of South Carolina. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf
28.
KolivasE. D.GrossA. M. (2007). Assessing sexual aggression: Addressing the gap between rape victimization and perpetration prevalence rates. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 315–328. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.002
29.
KossM. P. (1993). Rape: Scope, impact, interventions, and public policy responses. American Psychologist, 48, 1062–1069. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.10.1062
30.
KossM. P.AbbeyA.CampbellR.CookS.NorrisJ.TestaM.…WhiteJ. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 357–370. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
31.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.422
32.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A.WisniewskiN. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170. Retrieved fromhttp://psycnet.apa.orgjournals/ccp/55/2/162
33.
KrahéB.HaasS.VanwesenbeeckI.BianchiG.ChliaoutakisJ.FuertesA.…ZygadloA. (2016). Interpreting survey questions about sexual aggression in cross-cultural research: A qualitative study with young adults from nine european countries. Sexuality & Culture, 20, 1–23. doi:10.1007/s12119-015-9321-2
34.
KrahéB.VanwesenbeeckI. (2015). Mapping an agenda for the study of youth sexual aggression in Europe: Assessment, principles of good practice, and the multilevel analysis of risk factors. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 2600, 1–16. doi:10.1080/13552600.2015.1066885
35.
KrebsC.LindquistC.PlantyM.LangtonL.BerzofskyM. E.AsefniaN.…EndersK. (2017). Sensitivity of sexual victimization estimates to definitional and measurement decisions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. doi:10.1177/0886260517744190
36.
KrebsC. P.BarrickK.LindquistC. H.CrosbyC. M.BoydC.BoganY. (2011). The sexual assault of undergraduate women at historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3640–3666. doi:10.1177/0886260511403759
37.
KrebsC. P.LindquistC. H.WarnerT. D.FisherB. S.MartinS. L. (2007). The campus sexual assault (CSA) study final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
38.
LiberatiA.AltmanD. G.TetzlaffJ.MulrowC.GøtzscheP. C.IoannidisJ. P.…MoherD. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000100.
39.
LohC.OrchowskiL. M.GidyczC. A.ElizagaR. A. (2007). Socialization and sexual aggression in college men: The role of observational influence in detecting risk cues. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 129–144. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.8.3.129
MendesK.RingroseJ.KellerJ. (2018). #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25, 236–246.
42.
MuehlenhardC. L.PetersonZ. D.HumphreysT. P.JozkowskiK. N. (2017). Evaluating the one-in-five statistic: Women’s risk of sexual assault while in college. Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014
43.
PetersonZ. D.VollerE. K.PolusnyM. A.MurdochM. (2010). Prevalence and consequences of adult sexual assault of men: Review of empirical findings and state of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.006
44.
QuickJ. C.McFadyenM. (2017). Sexual harassment: Have we made any progress?Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 286–298.
45.
RapaportK.BurkhartB. R. (1984). Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216–221. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.93.2.216
46.
RothmanE. F.ExnerD.BaughmanA. L. (2011). The prevalence of sexual assault against people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual in the United States: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 12, 55–66. doi:10.1177/1524838010390707
47.
RueffW. T.GrossA. M. (2017). Assessing sexual coercion: Survey wording differences and the victimization-perpetration discrepancy. Journal of Family Violence, 32, 325–331. doi:10.1007/s10896-016-9859-2
48.
SmithP. H.HomishG. G.LeonardK. E.CorneliusJ. R. (2012). Intimate partner violence and specific substance use disorders: Findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 236–245. doi:10.1037/a0024855
49.
SorensonS. B.JoshiM.SivitzE. (2014). Knowing a sexual assault victim or perpetrator: A stratified random sample of undergraduates at one university. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 394–416. doi:10.1177/0886260513505206
50.
SpitzbergB. H. (1999). An analysis of empirical estimates of sexual aggression victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 14, 241–260.
51.
StrangE.PetersonZ. D. (2017). Unintentional misreporting on self-report measures of sexually aggressive behavior: An interview study. The Journal of Sex Research, 54, 1–13. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1304519
52.
StrangE.PetersonZ. D.HillY. N.HeimanJ. R. (2013). Discrepant responding across self-report measures of men’s coercive and aggressive sexual strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 458–469. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.646393
53.
Struckman-JohnsonC.AndersonP. B.Struckman-JohnsonD.SmeatonG. (2019). The post-refusal sexual persistence scale. In MilhausenR.SakulukJ. K.FisherT. D.DavisC. M.YarberW. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
SutherlandJ. L.AmarA. F.SutherlandM. A. (2014). Victimization and perpetration of sexual violence in college-aged men and women. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 10, 153–159.
55.
SwainS. D.WeathersD.NiedrichR. W. (2008). Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed Likert items. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 116–131. doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.1.116
56.
SwartoutK. M.KossM. P.WhiteJ. W.ThompsonM. P.AbbeyA.BellisA. L. (2015). Trajectory analysis of the campus serial rapist assumption. JAMA Pediatrics, 169, 1148–1154. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0707
57.
TharpA. T.DeGueS.ValleL. A.BrookmeyerK. A.MassettiG. M.MatjaskoJ. L. (2013). A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 14. doi:10.1177/1524838012470031
58.
ThompsonE. H.CraccoE. J. (2008). Sexual aggression in bars: What college men can normalize. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 16, 82–96. doi:10.3149/jms.1601.82
59.
TurchikJ. A.HassijaC. M. (2014). Female sexual victimization among college students: Assault severity, health risk behaviors, and sexual functioning. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2439–2457. doi:10.1177/0886260513520230
60.
TylerK. A.HoytD. R.WhitbeckL. B. (1998). Coercive sexual strategies. Violence and Victims, 13, 47–61.
61.
VegaE. M.O’LearyK. D. (2007). Test–retest reliability of the revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Violence. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9118-7
62.
YbarraM. L.EspelageD. L.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.KorchmarosJ. D.BoydD. (2016). Lifetime prevalence rates and overlap of physical, psychological, and sexual dating abuse perpetration and victimization in a national sample of youth. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1083–1099. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0748-9
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
