Rejection sensitivity (RS) is a personality disposition characterized by oversensitivity to social rejection; individuals who are sensitive to social rejection tend to anxiously or angrily expect, readily perceive, and overreact to it. The associations between (a) RS and aggression and (b) RS and victimization have been studied in recent years. However, the strength of these associations varied considerably between studies. This review aimed to synthesize the primary literature to improve our insight into these associations.
Method:
A comprehensive literature search yielded 52 studies (with a total of 66,405 participants and producing 203 effect sizes) on the RS-aggression and RS-victimization associations. Three-level meta-analytic models were used to synthesize effect sizes and to examine potential moderators of the RS-aggression association and the RS-victimization association, respectively.
Results:
There was a small but significant association between RS and aggression (pooled r = .183; p < .001) and a slightly below moderate and significant association between RS and victimization (pooled r = .298; p < .001). The RS-aggression association was stronger for angry RS than for anxious RS and stronger for reactive aggression than for proactive aggression. Similar results were obtained in analyzing the longitudinal associations only.
Conclusions:
RS is significantly associated with aggression and victimization. The implications of the results for clinical practice as well as directions for future research are discussed.
AssinkM.WibbelinkC. J. (2016). Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12, 154–174. doi:10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154
2.
AydukÖ.GyurakA.LuerssenA. (2008). Individual differences in the rejection–aggression link in the hot sauce paradigm: The case of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 775–782. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.004
3.
BondüR.RichterP. (2016). Linking forms and functions of aggression in adults to justice and rejection sensitivity. Psychology of Violence, 6, 292–302. doi:10.1037/a0039200
4.
BoyceP.ParkerG. (1989). Development of a scale to measure interpersonal sensitivity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23, 341–351.
5.
CamodecaM.GoossensF. A. (2005). Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 186–197. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00347.x
6.
CardN. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
CheungM. W. L. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19, 211–229. doi:10.1037/a0032968
8.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
9.
CrickN. R.DodgeK. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01778.x
10.
CroftC. D.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2014). Friendship conflict, conflict responses, and instability: Unique links to anxious and angry forms of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 1094–1119. doi:10.1177/0272431613518972
11.
DillE. J.VernbergE. M.FonagyP.TwemlowS. W.GammB. K. (2004). Negative affect in victimized children: The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and attitudes toward bullying. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 159–173. doi:10.1023/B: JACP.0000019768.31348.81
12.
DowneyG.FeldmanS. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343.
13.
DowneyG.FreitasA. L.MichaelisB.KhouriH. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 545–560.
14.
DowneyG.KhouriH.FeldmanS. I. (1997). Early interpersonal trauma and later adjustment: The mediational role of rejection sensitivity. In CicchettiD.TothS. L. (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on trauma: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 85–114). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
15.
DowneyG.MougiosV.AydukO.LondonB. E.ShodaY. (2004). Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues. Psychological Science, 15, 668–673. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00738.x
16.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
17.
ErozkanA. (2015). The childhood trauma and late adolescent rejection sensitivity. Anthropologist, 19, 413–422. doi:10.1080/09720073.2015.11891675
18.
GaoS.AssinkM.CiprianiA.LinK. (2017). Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 57, 59–74. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.007
19.
GlasøL.MatthiesenS. B.NielsenM. B.EinarsenS. (2007). Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 313–319. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00554.x
JacobsN.HarperB. (2013). The effects of rejection sensitivity on reactive and proactive aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 3–12. doi:10.1002/ab.21455
22.
KahyaK. (2018). Intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration in a Turkish female sample: Rejection sensitivity and hostility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–24. doi:10.1177/0886260518786499
23.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
LondonB.DowneyG.BonicaC.PaltinI. (2007). Social causes and consequences of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 481–506. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00531.x
25.
LondonB.DowneyG.Romero-CanyasR.RattanA.TysonD. (2012). Gender-based rejection sensitivity and academic self-silencing in women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 961–979. doi:10.1037/a0026615
26.
MarinT. J.MillerG. E. (2013). The interpersonally sensitive disposition and health: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 941–984. doi:10.1037/a0030800
27.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264–269. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
ParkL. E. (2007). Appearance-based rejection sensitivity: Implications for mental and physical health, affect, and motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 490–504. doi:10.1177/0146167206296301
30.
PollastriA. R.CardemilE. V.O’DonnellE. H. (2010). Self-esteem in pure bullies and bully/victims: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1489–1502. doi:10.1177/0886260509354579
31.
PremkumarP. (2012). Are you being rejected or excluded? Insights from neuroimaging studies using different rejection paradigms. Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience, 10, 144–154. doi:10.9758/cpn.2012.10.3.144
32.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromhttps://www.r-project.org/
33.
Romero-CanyasR.DowneyG.BerensonK.AydukO.KangN. J. (2010). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality, 78, 119–148. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00611.x
34.
RoweS. L.GembeckM. J. Z.RudolphJ.NesdaleD. (2015). A longitudinal study of rejecting and autonomy-restrictive parenting, rejection sensitivity, and socioemotional symptoms in early adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 1107–1118. doi:10.1007/s10802-014-9966-6
35.
Van den NoortgateW.López-LópezJ. A.Marín-MartínezF.Sánchez-MecaJ. (2013). Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 576–594. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0261-6
36.
Van den NoortgateW.López-LópezJ. A.Marín-MartínezF.Sánchez-MecaJ. (2015). Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes: A multilevel approach. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1274–1294. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0527-2
37.
ViechtbauerW. (2005). Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30, 261–293. doi:10.3102/10769986030003261
38.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
39.
WebbH. J.Zimmer-GembeckM. J.MastroS.FarrellL. J.WatersA. M.LavellC. H. (2015). Young adolescents’ body dysmorphic symptoms: Associations with same- and cross-sex peer teasing via appearance-based rejection sensitivity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 1161–1173. doi:10.1007/s10802-014-9971-9
40.
WilliamsC. A.DoorleyJ. D.Esposito-SmythersC. (2017). Interpersonal rejection sensitivity mediates the associations between peer victimization and two high-risk outcomes. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22, 649–663. doi:10.1177/1359104517712041
41.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.NesdaleD.WebbH. J.KhatibiM.DowneyG. (2016). A longitudinal rejection sensitivity model of depression and aggression: Unique roles of anxiety, anger, blame, withdrawal and retribution. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10802-016-0127-y
42.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.TrevaskisS.NesdaleD.DowneyG. A. (2014). Relational victimization, loneliness and depressive symptoms: Indirect associations via self and peer reports of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 568–582. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9993-6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
