Women from different backgrounds and cultures are at risk of domestic violence. Disclosing the abusive experience and seeking help is not straightforward and easy and might be a complicated and long-term process. Muslim women, like other groups of women, may face various barriers to disclose abusive relationships and for seeking help. Some of the barriers may be common for the majority of Muslim women in different contexts, while others might be related to women’s situations and the wider society they live. To identify these barriers and make recommendations for future studies, this article reviews related papers conducted in both Muslim-majority and non-Muslim-majority countries.
Method:
A critical systematic review of the literature was conducted for identifying Muslim women’s barriers in disclosing abuse and seeking help.
Results:
Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The main identified barriers are discussed into under four themes: social context, family context, individual factors, and expectations of service providers.
Conclusions:
Although the researchers tried to investigate various barriers in seeking help, many of them have not focused on structural obstacles. Besides, in many Muslim-majority countries, the issue has not been explored. Therefore, the results of the current article will not apply to those countries. Recommendation for future research comprises more qualitative research compatible with the women’s cultures and backgrounds in different societies, focusing more on structural and cultural factors to explore and find women’s barriers to seek help.
AbugideiriS. (2010). The peaceful families project: Addressing domestic violence in Muslim communities. Partner Abuse, 1, 363–376.
2.
AfifiE. M.Al-MuhaidebN. S.HadishN. F.IsmailF. I.Al-QeamyF. M. (2011). Domestic violence and its impact on married women’s health in Eastern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 32, 612–620.
3.
AghtaieN. (2016). Iranian women’s perspectives on violence against women in Iran and the UK. Iranian Studies, 49, 593–611.
4.
AhmadF.RiazS.BarataP.StewartD. E. (2004). Patriarchal beliefs and perceptions of abuse among South Asian immigrant women. Violence Against Women, 10, 262–282.
5.
AisyahS.ParkerL. (2014). Problematic conjugations: Women’s agency, marriage and domestic violence in Indonesia. Asian Studies Review, 38, 205–223.
Al-KrenawiA.JacksonS. O. (2014). Arab American marriage: Culture, tradition, religion, and the social worker. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24, 115–137.
8.
Al-ModallalH. (2017). Disclosure of spousal violence: viewpoints from the Jordanian society. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 164–182.
9.
AlhabibS.NurU.JonesR. (2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 369–382.
10.
AliP. A.NaylorP. B.CrootE.O’CathainA. (2015). Intimate partner violence in Pakistan: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16, 299–315.
11.
AlmosaedN. (2004). Violence against women: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 24, 67–88.
12.
AmmarN.Couture-CarronA.AlviS.AntonioJ. S. (2013). Experiences of Muslim and non-Muslim battered immigrant women with the police in the United States: A closer understanding of commonalities and differences. Violence Against Women, 19, 1449–1471.
13.
AnderssonN.CockcroftA.AnsariU.OmerK.AnsariN. M.KhanA.ChaudhryU. U. (2010). Barriers to disclosing and reporting violence among women in Pakistan: Findings from a national household survey and focus group discussions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1965–1985.
14.
AyyubR. (2000). Domestic violence in the South Asian Muslim immigrant population in the United States. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 9, 237–248.
15.
BahramiM.ShokrollahiP.KohanS.MomeniG.RivazM. (2016). Reaction to and coping with domestic violence by Iranian women victims: A qualitative approach. Global Journal of Health Science, 8, 100.
16.
BaigR. B. (2016). The power to change: Muslim women’s rights movement and the resistance towards gender-based violence. China Journal of Social Work, 9, 200–217.
17.
BanoS. (2007). Muslim family justice and human rights: The experience of British Muslim women. Journal of Comparative Law, 2, 38.
18.
BruceS. (2011). Defining religion: A practical response. International Review of Sociology, 21, 107–120.
19.
BucciL. (2012). An overview of the legal and cultural issues for Muslim migrant women of the European Union: A focus on domestic violence and Italy. Crime, Law and Social change, 58, 75–92.
20.
CarlandS. (2017) Fighting Hislam: Women, Faith and Sexism. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
21.
ChoH.HuangL. (2016). Aspects of help seeking among collegiate victims of dating violence. Journal of Family Violence, 32, 409–417.
22.
ChowbeyP. (2016). Employment, masculinities, and domestic violence in ‘fragile’ contexts: Pakistani women in Pakistan and the UK. Gender & Development, 24, 493–509.
CwikelJ.Lev-WieselR.Al-KrenawiA. (2003). The physical and psychosocial health of Bedouin Arab women of the Negev area of Israel The impact of high fertility and pervasive domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 9, 240–257.
25.
DoukiS.NacefF.BelhadjA.BouaskerA.GhachemR. (2003). Violence against women in Arab and Islamic countries. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 6, 165–171.
26.
DunhamK.SennC. Y. (2000). Minimizing negative experiences: Women’s disclosure of partner abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 251–261.
27.
EisikovitsZ.BuchbinderE.BsharaA. (2008). Between the person and the culture: Israeli Arab couple’s perceptions of police intervention in intimate partner violence. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 17, 108–129.
EllisonC. G.TrinitapoliJ. A.AndersonK. L.JohnsonB. R. (2007). Race/ethnicity, religious involvement, and domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 1094–1112.
30.
EvansM. A.FederG. S. (2014). Help-seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: A qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support. Health Expectations, 19(1), 62–73.
31.
FloodM.PeaseB. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 125–142.
32.
FuluE.MiedemaS. (2016). Globalization and changing family relations: Family violence and women’s resistance in Asian Muslim societies. Sex Roles, 74, 480–494.
33.
GhafourniaN. (2017). Muslim women and domestic violence: Developing a framework for social work practice. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 36, 146–163.
34.
GharaibehM.OweisA. (2009). Why do Jordanian women stay in an abusive relationship: Implications for health and social well-being. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 41, 376–384.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2002). Attitudes of Arab women toward different patterns of coping with wife abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 721–745.
37.
Hassouneh-PhillipsD. S. (2001). “Marriage is half of faith and the rest is fear Allah” marriage and spousal abuse among American Muslims. Violence Against Women, 7, 927–946.
38.
HayatiE. N.ErikssonM.HakimiM.HogbergU.EmmelinM. (2013). “Elastic band strategy”: Women’s lived experiences of coping with domestic violence in rural Indonesia. Global Health Action, 6, 1–12.
39.
HunnicuttG. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15, 553–573.
40.
KellyL.BalzaniM.GillA.ThiaraR.MacaulayR. (2009). Violence against women in South Asian communities: Issues for policy and practice. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
41.
KiteleyR.StogdonC. (2013). Literature reviews in social work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
KopffC. (2015). Tradition. In SegalR. A.von StuckradK. (Eds.), Vocabulary for the study of religion (Vol. 3, pp. 505–511). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill NV.
43.
KulwickiA.AswadB.CarmonaT.BalloutS. (2010). Barriers in the utilization of domestic violence services among Arab immigrant women: Perceptions of professionals, service providers & community leaders. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 727–735.
44.
LiangB.GoodmanL.Tummala-NarraP.WeintraubS. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 71–84.
MadhaniF. I.KarmalianiR.PatelC.BannC. M.McClureE. M.PashaO.GoldenbergR. L. (2017). Women’s perceptions and experiences of domestic violence: An observational study from Hyderabad, Pakistan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 76–100.
47.
MehreganA. (2016). Islamo-Arabic culture and women’s law: An introduction to the sociology of women’s law in Islam. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law—Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 29, 405–424.
48.
MullalyB. (2010). Challenging oppression and confronting privilege: A critical social work approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
NavedR. T.AzimS.BhuiyaA.PerssonL. Å. (2006). Physical violence by husbands: Magnitude, disclosure and help-seeking behavior of women in Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 2917–2929.
50.
NiuX.LaidlerK. A. J. (2015). Understanding domestic violence against Muslim women in China. Feminist Criminology, 10, 92–112.
51.
Oyewuwo-GassikiaO. B. (2016). American Muslim women and domestic violence service seeking: A literature review. Affilia, 31, 450–462.
52.
PopeC.MaysN.PopayJ. (2007). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative health evidence: A guide to methods: A guide to methods. London, England: McGraw-Hill Education.
53.
PotterH. (2007). Battered black women’s use of religious services and spirituality for assistance in leaving abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 13, 262–284.
54.
RahmanF. Z. (2012). Gender equality in Muslim-majority states and Shari’a family law: Is there a link?Australian Journal of Political Science, 47, 347–362.
55.
RasoolS. (2016). Help-seeking after domestic violence the critical role of children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 1661–1686.
56.
Sadeghi FassaeiS. (2010). خشونت خانگی و استراتژيهاي زنان در مواجهه با آن مطالعهاي کیفی [In Persian] [Domestic violence and women’s strategies to cope: A qualitative study]. مجله بررسی مسائل اجتماعی ایران [In Persian]. Iranian Journal of Social Problems, 1, 107–142.
57.
SchulerS. R.BatesL. M.IslamF. (2008). Women’s rights, domestic violence, and recourse seeking in rural Bangladesh. Violence Against Women, 14(3), 326–345.
58.
SpencerR. A.ShahrouriM.HalasaL.KhalafI.ClarkC. J. (2014). Women’s help seeking for intimate partner violence in Jordan. Health Care for Women International, 35, 380–399.
59.
StivensM. (2006). “Family values” and Islamic revival: Gender, rights and state moral projects in Malaysia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 354–367.
60.
SylaskaK. M.EdwardsK. M. (2014). Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15, 3–21.
61.
TaherkhaniS.NegarandehR.SimbarM.AhmadiF. (2016). Iranian women’s strategies for coping with domestic violence. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 5, e33124.
62.
TaketA.CrispB. R. (2018). Eliminating gender-based violence. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
63.
TashkandiA.RasheedP. (2009). Wife abuse: A hidden problem. A study among Saudi women attending PHC centres. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 15, 1242–1254.
64.
ThomasJ.HardenA. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45.
65.
TracyS. R. (2007). Patriarchy and domestic violence: Challenging common misconceptions. Journal-Evangelical Theological Society, 50, 573.
66.
TrotterJ. L.AllenN. E. (2009). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Domestic violence survivors’ experiences with their informal social networks. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 221–231.
WahabS.Anderson-NatheB.GringeriC. (2014). Feminisms in social work research: Promise and possibilities for justice-based knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
69.
WelchmanL. (2007). Women and Muslim family laws in Arab states: A comparative overview of textual development and advocacy. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
70.
WoodheadL. (2011). Five concepts of religion. International Review of Sociology, 21, 121–143.
