Better Together? A Review of Evidence for Multi-Disciplinary Teams Responding to Physical and Sexual Child Abuse

Abstract

Multi-Disciplinary teams (MDTs) have often been presented as the key to dealing with a number of intractable problems associated with responding to allegations of physical and sexual child abuse. While these approaches have proliferated internationally, researchers have complained of the lack of a specific evidence base identifying the processes and structures supporting multi-disciplinary work and how these contribute to high-level outcomes. This systematic search of the literature aims to synthesize the existing state of knowledge on the effectiveness of MDTs. This review found that overall there is reasonable evidence to support the idea that MDTs are effective in improving criminal justice and mental health responses compared to standard agency practices. The next step toward developing a viable evidence base to inform these types of approaches seems to be to more clearly identify the mechanisms associated with effective MDTs in order to better inform how they are planned and implemented.

Keywords

sexual abuse child abuse forensic interviewing treatment/intervention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altshuler

S. J.

(2005). Drug-endangered children need a collaborative community response. Child Welfare, 84, 171–190.

Bai

Wells

Hillemeier

M. M.

(2009). Coordination between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers, children’s service use, and outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 372–381. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.10.004

Bonach

Mabry

J. B.

Potts-Henry

(2010). Exploring nonoffending caregiver satisfaction with a children’s advocacy center. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19, 687–708.

Bradford

A. B.

(2005). Legal outcomes as effectiveness research of forensic interviewing at the Child Advocacy Center of East Alabama (Doctoral Dissertation). Auburn University, Auburn, AL.

Brink

F. W.

Thackeray

J. D.

Bridge

J. A.

Letson

M. M.

Scribano

P. V.

(2015). Child advocacy center multidisciplinary team decision and its association to child protective services outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 46, 174–181. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.011

Bromfield

Higgins

(2005). National comparison of child protection systems. Child Abuse Prevention Issues, 22, 1–32.

Campbell

Greeson

M. R.

Bybee

Fehler-cabral

(2012). Adolescent sexual assault victims and the legal system: Building community relationships to improve prosecution rates. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 141–154. doi:10.1007/s10464-011-9485-3

Carroll

Patterson

Wood

Booth

Rick

Balain

(2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 1–9.

Chen

Glasser

Benbenishty

Davidson-Arad

Tzur

Lerner-Geva

(2010). The contribution of a hospital child protection team in determining suspected child abuse and neglect: Analysis of referrals of children aged 0–9. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1664–1669. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.07.008

10.

Child Protection Systems Royal Commission. (2016). The life they deserve: Child Protection Systems Royal Commission report. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.

11.

Chomba

Murray

Kautzman

Haworth

Kasese-Bota

Kankasa

… Semrau

(2010). Integration of services for victims of child sexual abuse at the university teaching hospital one-stop centre. Journal of Tropical Medicine. doi:10.1155/2010/864760

12.

Chuang

Lucio

(2011). Interagency collaboration between child welfare agencies, schools, and mental health providers and children’s mental health service receipt. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 4, 4–15.

13.

Chuang

Wells

(2010). The role of inter-agency collaboration in facilitating receipt of behavioral health services for youth involved with child welfare and juvenile justice. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1814–1822. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.002

14.

Conners-Burrow

N. A.

Tempel

A. B.

Sigel

B. A.

Church

J. K.

Kramer

T. L.

Worley

K. B.

(2012). The development of a systematic approach to mental health screening in Child Advocacy Centres. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1675–1682.

15.

Cross

T. P.

(2001). Outcomes survey. Retrieved July 30, 2015, from http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/projects/CAC_Outcomes_UNH_2001_files/frame.htm

16.

Cross

T. P.

Finklehor

Ormrod

(2005). Police involvement in child protective services investigations: Literature review and secondary data analysis. Child Maltreatment, 10, 1–21.

17.

Cross

T. P.

Jones

L. M.

Walsh

W. A.

Simone

Kolko

(2007). Child forensic interviewing in Children’s Advocacy Centers: Empirical data on a practice model. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1031–1052. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.007

18.

Edinburgh

Saewyc

Levitt

(2008). Caring for young adolescent sexual abuse victims in a hospital-based Children’s Advocacy Center. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1119–1126.

19.

Elmquist

Shorey

R. C.

Febres

Zapor

Klostermann

K. S. A.

Stuart

G. L.

(2015). A review of Children’s Advocacy Centers’ (CACs) response to cases of child maltreatment in the United States. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 26–34. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.002

20.

Faller

K. C.

Henry

(2000). Child sexual abuse: A case study in community collaboration. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1215–1225.

21.

Glisson

Hemmelgarn

(1998). The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children’s service systems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 401–421. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00005-2

22.

Goldbeck

Laib-Koehnemund

Fegert

J. M.

(2007). A randomized controlled trial of consensus-based child abuse case management. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 919–933.

23.

Guobrandsson

(2014). Towards a child-friendly justice and support for child victims of sexual abuse. Protecting children from sexual violence: A comprehensive approach: Council of Europe. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/children/1in5/WhatWeKnow/Publication_en.asp

24.

Hebert

Bor

Swenson

C. C.

Boyle

(2014). Improving collaboration: A qualitative assessment of inter-agency collaboration between a pilot Multisystemic Therapy Child Abuse and Neglect (MST-CAN) program and a child protection team. Australasian Psychiatry, 22, 370–373. doi:10.1177/1039856214539572

25.

Herbert

J. L.

Bromfield

(2016). Evidence for the efficacy of the Child Advocacy Center model: A systematic review. Trauma Violence & Abuse, 17, 341–357. doi:10.1177/1524838015585319

26.

Herbert

J. L.

Bromfield

(2017). National cross-agency comparison of practice in responding to criminal child abuse: A report for the NSW Ombudsman’s office. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Ombudsman.

27.

Herbert

J. L.

Walsh

Bromfield

(2017). A National Survey of Characteristics of Child Advocacy Centers in the United States: Do the Flagship Models Match Those in Broader Practice?

28.

Hochstadt

N. J.

Harwicke

N. J.

(1985). How effective is the multidisciplinary approach? A follow-up study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9, 365–372. doi:10.1016/0145-2134%2885%2990034-1

29.

Hubel

G. S.

Campbell

West

Friedenberg

Schreier

Flood

M. F.

Hansen

D. J.

(2014). Child advocacy center based group treatment for child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23, 304–325.

30.

Humphreys

(1995). Whatever happened on the way to counselling? Hurdles in the interagency environment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 801.

31.

Hurlburt

M. S.

Leslie

L. K.

Landsverk

Barth

R. P.

Burns

B. J.

Gibbons

R. D.

… Zhang

J. J.

(2004). Contextual predictors of mental health service use among children open to child welfare. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 1217–1224.

32.

Jackson

S. L.

(2004). A USA national survey of program service provided by Child Advocacy Centers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 411–421.

33.

Jaudes

P. K.

Martone

(1992). Interdisciplinary evaluations of alleged sexual abuse cases. Pediatrics, 89, 1164–1168.

34.

Jenson

J. M.

Jacobson

Unrau

Robinson

R. L.

(1996). Intervention for victims of child sexual abuse: An evaluation of the Children’s Advocacy Model. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 13, 139–156. doi:10.1007/BF01876643

35.

Joa

Edelson

M. G.

(2004). Legal outcomes for children who have been sexually abused: The impact of child abuse assessment center evaluations. Child Maltreatment, 9, 263–276.

36.

Jones

L. M.

Cross

T. P.

Walsh

Simone

(2007). Do children’s advocacy centers improve families’ experience of child sexual abuse investigations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1069–1085.

37.

Klenig

(2007). The George Jones Child Advocacy Centre: A case study on a service designed to support children who have experienced sexual abuse and their families. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.

38.

Kolbo

J. R.

Strong

(1997). Multidisciplinary team approaches to the investigation and resolution of child abuse and neglect: A national survey. Child Maltreatment, 2, 61–72.

39.

Lalayants

Epstein

(2005). Evaluating multi-disciplinary child abuse and neglect teams: A research agenda. Child Welfare, 84, 433–458.

40.

Lalayants

Epstein

Adamy

(2011). Multidisciplinary consultation in child protection: A clinical data-mining evaluation. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 156–166. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00741.x

41.

Lippert

Cross

T. P.

Jones

Walsh

(2009). Telling interviewers about sexual abuse: Predictors of child disclosure at forensic interviews. Child Maltreatment, 14, 100–113.

42.

Miller

Rubin

(2009). The contribution of Children’s Advocacy Centres to felony prosecutions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 12–18.

43.

National Children’s Advocacy Center. (2010). Efficacy of Child Advocacy Centers. Retrieved from http://www.nationalcac.org/professionals/images/stories/pdfs/efficacy%20of%20cacs%20bib3.pdf

44.

National Children’s Advocacy Center. (2013). Annotated bibliography for the empirical and scholarly literature supporting the ten standards for accreditation by the National Children’s Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.nationalcac.org/images/pdfs/CALiO/Bibliographies/annotatedbibliography-standards-second-ed.pdf

45.

New South Wales Ombudsman. (2012). Responding to child sexual assault in Aboriginal communities: A report under part 6A of the Community Services (Complaints, Reviews and Monitoring) Act 1993. Sydney, Australia: Author.

46.

Newman

B. S.

Dannenfelser

P. L.

Pendleton

B. S.

(2005). Child abuse investigations: Reasons for using Child Advocacy Centers and suggestions for improvement. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 22, 165–181.

47.

Nwogu

Agrawal

Chambers

Buagas

Daniele

R. M.

Singleton

(2015). Effectiveness of Child Advocacy Centers and the multidisciplinary team approach on prosecution rates of alleged sex offenders and satisfaction of non-offending caregivers with allegations of child sexual abuse: A systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 13, 93–129.

48.

Onyskiw

J. E.

Harrison

M. J.

Spady

McConnan

(1999). Formative evaluation of a collaborative community-based child abuse prevention project. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 1069–1081. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134%2899%2900080-0

49.

Owen

(2006). Evaluation forms and approaches. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

50.

Pardess

Finzi

Sever

(1993). Evaluating the best interests of the child: A model of multidisciplinary teamwork. Medicine & Law, 12, 205–211.

51.

Powell

M. B.

Wright

(2012). Professional’s perceptions of a new model of sexual assault investigation adopted by Victorian Police. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 23, 333–352.

52.

Rasmusson

(2011). Children’s advocacy centers (Barnahus) in Sweden. Child Indicators Research, 4, 301–321.

53.

Rivara

F. P.

(1985). Physical abuse in children under two: A study of therapeutic outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9, 81–87. doi:10.1016/0145-2134%2885%2990095-X

54.

Ruggieri

C. L.

(2011). Child advocacy centers and child sexual abuse in Nevada. MA, ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection database, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Ann Arbor.

55.

Sahin

Cepik-Kuruoglu

Demirel

Akar

Duyan-Camurdan

Iseri

… Oral

(2009). Six-year experience of a hospital-based child protection team in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, 51, 336–343.

56.

Sedlak

Schultz

Wells

S. J.

Lyons

Doueck

H. J.

Gragg

(2006). Child protection and justice systems processing of serious child abuse and neglect cases. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 657–677. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.010

57.

Shao

(2006). Economic evaluation of the children’s advocacy centre program and sex offender registration laws. Doctor of Philosophy, University of Alabama, AL.

58.

Shepler

D. A.

(2010). Re-victimization among victims of childhood sexual abuse: The impact of a child advocacy center (master thesis). University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK.

59.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.

60.

Smith

D. W.

Witte

T. H.

Fricker-Elhai

A. E.

(2006). Service outcomes in physical and sexual abuse cases: A comparison of Child Advocacy Center-based and standard services. Child Maltreatment, 11, 354–360.

61.

Turner

G. C.

(1997). Evaluating the interdisciplinary team approach to child sexual abuse investigation: A retrospective chart review comparing multi-agency and interdisciplinary investigatory approaches. PhD, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database, New York University, Ann Arbor.

62.

Wallace

G. H.

Makoroff

K. L.

Malott

H. A.

Shapiro

R. A.

(2007). Hospital-based multidisciplinary teams can prevent unnecessary child abuse reports and out-of-home placements. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 623–629. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.12.010

63.

Walsh

W. A.

Cross

T. P.

Jones

Simone

Kolko

(2007). Which sexual abuse victims receive a forensic medical examination? The impact of Children’s Advocacy Centers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1053–1068. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.006

64.

Walsh

W. A.

Lippert

Cross

T. P.

Maurice

D. M.

Davison

(2008). How long to prosecute child sexual abuse for a community using a Children’s Advocacy Center and comparison communities? Child Maltreatment, 13, 3–13.

65.

Wolfteich

Loggins

(2007). Evaluation of the Children’s Advocacy Center model: Efficiency, legal and revictimization outcomes. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24, 333–352. doi:10.1007/s10560-007-0087-8

66.

Yeaman

J. M.

(1986). Facilitating prevention and prosecution of child sexual abuse through the multi-disciplinary assessment team. Current Municipal Problems, 13, 228–233.