Concerns about sexting are increasingly prevalent in mainstream and academic media despite limited and inconsistent research findings about the practice. Much of this discourse centers around harm and sexting is commonly considered to be a risky behavior. A driving factor in these discussions is the apparent conflation of consensual and nonconsensual acts or sexting behaviors. A systematic review was conducted to determine the extent to which consensual and nonconsensual acts were conflated in the legal, educational, and psychological literatures on sexting, and how nonconsensual sexting was conceptualized within these disciplines. Definitions of sexting varied widely with regard to the inclusion or exclusion of nonconsensual acts. Nonconsensual acts were conceptualized in the following ways: as a risk of sexing, as being the fault of the victim, as bullying, or as a form of violence against women. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
AbeeleM. V.CampbellS. W.EggermontS.RoeK. (2014). Sexting, mobile porn use, and peer group dynamics: Boys’ and girls’ self-perceived popularity, need for popularity, and perceived peer pressure. Media Psychology, 17, 6–33. doi:10.1080/15213269.2013.801725
2.
AgustinaJ. R.Gómez-DuránE. L. (2012). Sexting: Research criteria of a globalized social phenomenon. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1325–1328.
3.
AlburyK.CrawfordK. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: Beyond Megan’s Story. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 26, 463–473. doi:10.1080/10304312.2012.665840
4.
AnastasioP. A.CostaD. M. (2004). Twice hurt: How newspaper coverage may reduce empathy and engender blame for female victims of crime. Sex Roles, 51, 535–542.
5.
BarkacsL. L.BarkacsC. B. (2010). Do you think I’m sexty? Minors and sexting: Teenage fad or child pornography?Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 13, 23–31.
6.
BarryJ. L. (2010). The child as victim and perpetrator: Laws punishing juvenile “sexting.”Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 13, 129–153.
7.
BaumgartnerS. E.SumterS. R.PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M.LivingstoneS. (2014). Does country context matter? Investigating the predictors of teen sexting across Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 157–164. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.041
8.
BealeA. V.HallK. R. (2007). Cyberbullying: What school administrators (and parents) can do. The Clearing House, 81(1), 8–12.
9.
BorrajoE.Gámez-GuadixM.CalveteE. (2015). Cyber dating abuse: Prevalence, context, and relationship with offline dating aggression. Psychological Reports: Relationships & Communications, 116, 565–585.
10.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
11.
BrownL. M.Chesney-LindM.SteinN. (2007). Patriarchy matters: Toward a gendered theory of teen violence and victimization. Violence against Women, 13, 1249–1273. doi:10.1177/1077801207310430
12.
CampbellS. W.ParkY. J. (2014). Predictors of mobile sexting among teens: Toward a new explanatory framework. Mobile Media & Communication, 2, 20–39. doi:10.1177/2050157913502645
13.
DakeJ. A.PriceJ. H.MaziarzL.WardB. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7, 1–15. doi:10.1080/15546128.2012.650959
14.
DeMitchellT. A.Parker-MagagnaM. (2011). Student victim or student criminals? The bookends of sexting in a cyber world. Cardozo Public Law, Policy, & Ethics Journal, 10, 1–43.
15.
Dixon-WoodsM.AgarwalS.JonesD.YoungB.SuttonA. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10, 45–53.
16.
DöringN. (2014). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting?Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8, article 9. doi:10.5817/CP2014-1-9
17.
DraperN. R. A. (2012). Is your teen at risk? Discourses of adolescent sexting in United States television news. Journal of Children and Media, 6, 221–236.
18.
DrouinM.VogelK. N.SurbeyA.StillsJ. R. (2013). Let’s talk about sexting, baby: Computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, A25–A30. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.030
19.
EdgleyC.KiserK. (1982). Polaroid sex: Deviant possibilities in a technological age. The Journal of American Culture, 5, 59–64.
20.
FineM. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
21.
Gordon-MesserD.BauermeisterJ. A.GrodzinskiA.ZimmermanM. (2013). Sexting among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 301–306. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.013
22.
HallR. (2004). “It can happen to you”: Rape prevention in the age of risk management. Hypatia, 19, 1–19.
23.
HarrisA. L. (2011). Media and technology in adolescent sexual education and safety. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 40, 235–242.
24.
HasinoffA. A. (2012). Sexting as media production: Rethinking social media and sexuality. New Media & Society, 15, 449–465. doi:10.1177/1461444812459171
25.
HenryN.PowellA. (2015). Beyond the ‘sext’: Technology-facilitated sexual violence and harassment against adult women. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48, 104–118.
26.
JiwaniY.YoungM. L. (2006). Missing and murdered women: Reproducing marginality in news discourse. Canadian Journal of Communication, 31, 895–917.
27.
KaraianL. (2012). Lolita speaks: ‘Sexting,’ teenage girls and the law. Crime Media Culture, 8, 57–73.
28.
KarianL. (2014). Policing ‘sexting’: Responsibilization, respectability and sexual subjectivity in child protection/crime prevention responses to teenagers’ digital sexual expression. Theoretical Criminology, 18, 282–299. doi:10.1177/1362480613504331
29.
KerstensJ.StolW. (2014). Receiving online sexual requests and producing online sexual images: The multifaceted and dialogic nature of adolescents’ online sexual interactions. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1), article 1. doi: 10.5817/CP2014-1-8
30.
KhanK.KunzR.KleijnenJ.AntesG. (2011). Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
31.
KlettkeB.HallfordD. J.MellorD. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 44–53.
32.
KorenisP.BillickS. B. (2014). Forensic implications: Adolescent sexting and cyberbullying. Psychiatric Quarterly, 85, 97–101. doi:10.1007/s11126-013-9277-z
33.
KowalczykW. (2010). Abridging constitutional rights: Sexting legislation in Ohio. Cleveland State Law Review, 58, 685–715.
34.
LevendowskiA. (2014). Using copyright to combat revenge porn. N.Y.U. Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 3, 422–446.
35.
LivingstoneS.GörzigA. (2014). When adolescents receive sexual messages on the internet: Explaining experiences of risk and harm. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 8–15. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.021
36.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1994). Rape myths. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.
37.
LuginbuhlJ.MulinC. (1981). Rape and responsibility: How and how much is the victim blamed?Sex Roles, 7, 547–559.
38.
MarcusS. (1992). Fighting bodies, fighting words: A theory and politics of rape prevention. In ButlerJ.ScottJ. (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 385–403). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
MeyersM. (2004). African American women and violence: Gender, race, and class in the news. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21, 95–118.
40.
MorganP.GruberJ. E. (2011). Sexual harassment: Violence against women at work and in schools. In RenzettiC. M.EdlesonJ. L.Kennedy BrownR. (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (2nd ed., pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
NoblitG. W.HareR. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
NunziatoD. C. (2012). Romeo and Juliet online and in trouble: Criminalizing depictions of teen sexuality (c u 18r: g2g 2 jail). Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 10, 57–92.
43.
PellaiL. A.ErbaS.CiampelliA.IemmiD.BronzinS.CapobussiM.…CorradinM. (2015). Epidemiology of sexting. Minerva Pediatrica, 67, 1–9.
44.
Peterson-IyerK. (2013). Mobile porn? Teenage sexting and justice for women. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 33, 93–110. doi:10.1353/sce.2013.0036
45.
PowellA. (2010). Configuring consent: Emerging technologies, unauthorised sexual images and sexual assault. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43, 76–90.
46.
RingroseJ.GillR.LivingstoneS.HarveyL. (2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and ‘sexting’. London: NSPCC.
47.
RingroseJ.HarveyL.GillR.LivingstoneS. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14, 305–323. doi:10.1177/1464700113499853
48.
SalterM.CroftsT.LeeM. (2013). Beyond criminalization and responsibilisation: Sexting, gender, and young people. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 24, 301–316.
49.
ShariffS. (2005). Cyber-dilemmas in the new millennium: School obligations to provide student safety in a virtual school environment. McGill Journal of Education, 40, 467–487.
50.
StevensonK. (2000). Unequivocal victims: The historical roots of the mystification of the female complainant in rape cases. Feminist Legal Studies, 8, 343–366.
51.
StrassbergD. S.McKinnonR. K.SustaítaM. A.RulloJ. (2013). Sexting by high school students: An exploratory and descriptive study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 15–21.
52.
StrassbergD. S.RulloJ. E.MackaronisJ. E. (2014). The sending and receiving of sexually explicit cell phone photos (“sexting”) while in high school: One college’s students’ retrospective reports. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 177–183. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.008
53.
StrohmaierH.MurphyM.DeMatteoD. (2014). Youth sexting: Prevalence rates, driving motivations, and the deterrent effect of legal consequences. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11, 245–255. doi:10.1007/s13178-014-0162-9
54.
TempleJ. R.PaulJ. A.van den BergP.LeV. D.McElhanyA.TempleB. W. (2012). Teen sexting and its associations with sexual behaviours. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 166, 828–833.
55.
WeisK.BorgesS. S. (1973). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 8, 71–115.
56.
WillardN. E. (2011). School response to cyberbullying and sexting: The legal challenges. Brigham Young University. Education and Law Journal, 1, 75–125.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
