Changing the Hidden Curriculum of Campus Rape Prevention and Education: Women’s Self-Defense as a Key Protective Factor for a Public Health Model of Prevention
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online July, 2017
Changing the Hidden Curriculum of Campus Rape Prevention and Education: Women’s Self-Defense as a Key Protective Factor for a Public Health Model of Prevention
Recent activist, policy, and government efforts to engage in campus rape prevention education (RPE), culminating in the 2014 White House Task Force recommendations to combat campus sexual assault, prompt a need to examine the concept of “prevention” in the context of sexual assault on U.S. college campuses and their surrounding community service agencies. This article reviews previous research on effective resistance to sexual assault, showing that self-defense is a well-established protective factor in a public health model of sexual assault prevention. The article goes on to show, through an examination of campus rape prevention efforts framed as “primary prevention,” that self-defense is routinely excluded. This creates a hidden curriculum that preserves a gender status quo even while it strives for change. The article concludes with recommendations for how administrators, educators, facilitators, funding agencies, and others can incorporate self-defense into campus RPE for a more effective, data-driven set of sexual assault prevention efforts.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (n.d.). Core commitments: Educating students for personal and social responsibility. Retrieved fromhttps://www.aacu.org/core_commitments
4.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 463–481.
5.
BanyardV. L.PlanteE. G.MoynihanM. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 61–79.
6.
BarakG.LeightonP.CottonA. (2015). Class, race, gender, and crime: The social realities of justice in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
BrecklinL. A. (2008). Evaluation of self-defense training for women: A review. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 13, 60–76.
8.
BrecklinL. A.UllmanS. E. (2005). Self-defense or assertiveness training and women’s responses to sexual attacks. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 738–762.
9.
BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.BasileK. C.WaltersM. L.ChenJ.MerrickM. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63, 1–18. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6308.pdf
CermeleJ. (2004). Teaching resistance to teach resistance: The use of self-defense in teaching undergraduate about gender violence. Feminist Teacher, 15, 1–15.
17.
CermeleJ. (2010). Telling our stories: The importance of women’s narratives of resistance. Violence Against Women, 16, 1162–72.
18.
Clay-WarnerJ. (2002). Avoiding rape: The effect of protective actions and situational factors on rape outcomes. Violence and Victims, 17, 691–705.
19.
Cook-CraigP.MillspaughP. H.RecktenwaldE. A.KellyN. CHeggeL. M.CokerA. L.PletcherT. S. (2014). From Empower to Green Dot: Successful strategies and lessons learned in developing comprehensive sexual violence prevention programming. Violence Against Women, 20, 1162–78.
DixG. E. (2010). Criminal law summaries on criminal law (18th ed.). St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.
22.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
23.
FrazierK. E.Joffe FalmagneR. (2014). Empowered victims? Women’s contradictory positions in the discourse of violence prevention. Violence Against Women, 24, 479–499.
24.
GidyczC. A.DardisC. M. (2014). Feminist self-defense and resistance training for college students: A critical review and recommendations for the future. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15, 322–333.
25.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
26.
GoldJ.VillariS. (Eds.). (2000). Just sex: Students rewrite the rules on sex, violence, equality and activism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
27.
GoodJ. (2011). Sexists observing sexism: Consequences for female targets of benevolent and hostile sexism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
28.
GoodJ.RudmanL. A. (2010). When female applicants meet sexist interviewers: The costs of being a target of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 481–493.
KatesD. B.JrEngbergN. J. (1982). Deadly force self-defense against rape. University of California Davis Law Review, 15, 873–906.
36.
KellyL.RadfordJ. (1996). “Nothing really happened”: The invalidation of women’s experiences of violence. In HesterM.KellyL.RadfordJ. (Eds.), Women, violence, and male power (pp. 19–33). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
LambS. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In LambS. (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108–138). New York: NYU Press.
40.
LeeT. L.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2010). Next gen ambivalent sexism: Converging correlates, causality in context, and converse causality, an introduction to the special issue [Special issue]. Sex Roles, 62, 395–404.
McCaugheyM. (1997). Real knockouts: The physical feminism of women’s self-defense. New York: New York University Press.
43.
McCaugheyM. (2000). Kicking into consciousness through self-defense training: Getting physical in both theory and practice. In GoldJ.VillariS. (Eds.), Just sex: Students rewrite the rules on sex, violence, equality and activism (pp. 157–166). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield..
44.
McCaugheyM. (2013). Victim vaginas: The V-Day campaign and the vagina as symbol of female vulnerability. Women’s Studies, 42, 924–936.
45.
McCaugheyM.CermeleJ. (2014). Guest editors’ introduction. Violence Against Women, 20, 247–251.
46.
MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.ArnoldJ. S.EcksteinR. P.StapletonJ. G. (2010). Engaging intercollegiate athletes in preventing and intervening in sexual and intimate partner violence. Journal of American College Health, 59, 197–204.
47.
MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.ArnoldJ. S.EcksteinR. P.StapletonJ. G. (2011). Sisterhood may be powerful for reducing sexual and intimate partner violence: An evaluation of the Bringing in the Bystander in-person program with sorority members. Violence Against Women, 17, 703–719.
48.
White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault (2014). Not Alone: The first report of the white house task force to protect students from sexual assault. U.S. Government. Retrieved fromhttps://www.notalone.gov/assets/report.pdf
OrchowskiL. M.GidyczC. A.RaffleH. (2008). Evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction and self-defense program: A prospective analysis of a revisited protocol. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 204–218.
51.
OzerE. M.BanduraA. (1990). Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 472–486.
52.
PotterS. J.MoynihanM. M. (2011). Bringing in the Bystander in-person prevention program to a U. S. military installation: Results from a pilot study. Military Medicine, 176, 870–875.
RenzettiC. (1999). The challenge to feminism posed by women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. In LambS. (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 42–56). New York: NYU Press.
56.
RosenblumG. D.TaskaL. S. (2014). Self-defense training as clinical intervention for survivors of trauma [Special issue]. Violence Against Women, 20, 293–308.
57.
RozeeP. D.KossM. P. (2001). Rape: A century of resistance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 295–311.
SennC. Y. (2011). An imperfect feminist journey: Reflections on the process to develop an effective sexual assault resistance programme for university women. Feminism and Psychology, 21, 121–137.
61.
SennC. Y.EliasziwM.BarataP. C.ThurstonW. E.Newby-ClarkI. R.RadtkeH. L.HobdenK. L. (2015). Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for college women. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2326–2335.
62.
SennC. Y.HobdenK. L. (2015, 3). Empowering women to resist sexual assault: What it does and doesn’t do. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Women in Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
SmithM. D. (Ed.). (2004). Encyclopedia of rape. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
65.
SpeidelL. (2014). Exploring the intersection of race and gender in self-defense training. Violence Against Women, 20, 309–325.
66.
TarkJ.KleckG. (2014). Resisting rape: The effects of victim self-protection on rape completion and injury [Special issue]. Violence Against Women, 20, 270–292.
67.
TestaM.LivingstonJ. A. (2009). Alcohol consumption and women’s vulnerability to sexual victimization: Can reducing women’s drinking prevent rape?Substance Use and Misuse, 44, 1349–1376.
68.
ThompsonM. E. (2014). Empowering self-defense training. Violence Against Women, 20, 343–350.
69.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2006). Extent, nature and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
70.
UllmanS. E. (1997). Review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 177–204.
71.
UllmanS. E. (2007). A 10-year update on “Review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance.”Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 411–429.
72.
UllmanS. E.KnightR. A. (1993). The efficacy of women’s resistance strategies in rape situations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 23–38.
ZatzM. S. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. In HorneyJ. (Ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice systems (pp. 503–552). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs.
