This article addresses Winstok’s critiques and comments on my review and analysis of the status of scientific information on intimate partner violence (IPV). I present some background on the development of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2), an analysis of issues related to the operationalization of gender symmetry in IPV, and an evaluation of the hypotheses put forth by Winstok and others to explain the multimethod divergence in estimates for IPV gender patterns. Happily, we know much more about IPV than we did at the time of the creation and publication of the CTS2 in the mid-1990s, and excellent data can be brought to bear on many of these hypotheses. A scientific evaluation indicates that these hypotheses do not explain all of the data showing multimethod divergence. In some cases, these hypotheses have been repeatedly disconfirmed. On the other hand, increasing amounts of data indicate that choices regarding the operationalization of IPV in surveys have a substantial impact on gender patterns. Fairly simply methodological modifications can improve multimethod convergence. Evidence-based suggestions for measures showing multimethod convergence are provided. The field needs to continue to invest in increasing the scientific precision of violence measures.
AndersonK. L. (2013). Why do we fail to ask “Why” about gender and intimate partner violence?Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 314–318. doi:10.1111/jomf.12001
2.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.
3.
ArmstrongT. G.WernkeJ. Y.MedinaK. L.SchaferJ. (2002). Do partners agree about the occurrence of intimate partner violence?: A review of the current literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3, 181–193. doi:10.1177/15248380020033002
4.
ArriagaX. B. (2002). Joking violence among highly committed individuals. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 591–610.
5.
BanyardV.WeberM.GrychJ.HambyS. (in press). Where are the helpful bystanders? Ecological niche and victims’ perceptions of bystander intervention. Journal of Community Psychology.
6.
BlackM.BasileK.BreidingM.SmithS.WaltersM.MerrickM.…StevensM. (2011). The National Intimate and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
7.
BlumensteinL. (in press). Exploratory study on intimate partner kidnapping: Is this a prevailing issue in intimate partner relationships?Partner Abuse.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
10.
CampbellJ. C. (1995). Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CatalanoS. (2012). Intimate partner violence, 1993–2010 (NCJ 239203). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
12.
ChanK. L. (2012). Gender symmetry in the self-reporting of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 263–286.
13.
DeWallC. N.AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2011). The general aggression model: Theoretical extensions to violence. Psychology of Violence, 1, 245–258.
14.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York, NY: Free Press.
15.
Fernández-GonzálezL.O’LearyK. D.Muñoz-RivasM. J. (2013). We are not joking: Need for controls in reports of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 602–620. doi:10.1177/0886260512455518
16.
FinkelhorD.HambyS.OrmrodR.TurnerH. (2005). The Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Reliability, validity, and national norms. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 383–412.
17.
FinkelhorD.TurnerH.OrmrodR.HambyS. (2009). Violence, abuse and crime exposure in a national sample of children and youth. Pediatrics, 124, 1411–1423.
18.
FosheeV.BaumanK. E.HelmsR. W.KochG. G.LinderG. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45–50.
19.
FosheeV.BaumanK. E.LinderF.RiceJ.WilcherR. (2007). Typologies of adolescent dating violence: Identifying typologies of adolescent dating violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 498–519.
20.
Gonzalez-MendezR.Hernandez-CabreraJ. A. (2009). Play context, commitment, and dating violence: A structural equation model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1518–1535.
21.
GrychJ. H. (1998). Children’s appraisals of interparental conflict: Situational and contextual influences. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 437–453.
22.
HambyS. (2005). Measuring gender differences in partner violence: Implications from research on other forms of violent and socially undesirable behavior. Sex Roles, 52, 725–742.
23.
HambyS. (2009). The gender debate on intimate partner violence: Solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma, 1, 24–34.
24.
HambyS. (2014a). Battered women’s protective strategies: Stronger than you know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
HambyS. (2014b). Intimate partner and sexual violence research: Scientific progress, scientific challenges, and gender. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15, 149–158.
26.
HambyS. (2014). Self-report measures that do not produce gender parity in intimate partner violence: A multi-study investigation. Psychology of Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0038207
27.
HambyS.FinkelhorD.TurnerH. (2013). Perpetrator and victim gender patterns for 21 forms of youth victimization in the National Survey of children’s exposure to violence. Violence and Victims, 28, 915–939.
28.
HambyS.FinkelhorD.TurnerH. (2015). Intervention following family violence: Best practices & helpseeking obstacles in a nationally representative sample of families with children. Psychology of Violence, 5, 325–336.
29.
HambyS.GrychJ. (2013). The web of violence: Exploring connections among different forms of interpersonal violence and abuse. New York, NY: Springer.
30.
HambyS.TurnerH. (2013). Measuring teen dating violence in males and females: Insights from the National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence. Psychology of Violence, 3, 323–339.
31.
HambyS.WeberM. C.GrychJ.BanyardV. (2015). What difference do bystanders make? The association of bystander involvement with victim outcomes in a community sample. Psychology of Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0039073
IversonK. M.DickA.McLaughlinK. A.SmithB. N.BellM. E.GerberM. R.…MitchellK. S. (2012). Exposure to interpersonal violence and its associations with psychiatric morbidity in a US national sample: A gender comparison. Psychology of Violence, 3, 273–287.
34.
JohnsonH.SaccoV. F. (1995). Researching violence against women: Statistics Canada’s National Survey. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 281.
35.
JohnsonM. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.
36.
JohnsonM. P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 289–296.
37.
JourilesE.GarridoE.McDonaldR.RosenfieldD. (2009). Psychological and physical aggression in adolescent romantic relationships: Links to psychological distress. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 451–460.
38.
KossM. P.OrosC. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.
39.
LerhnerA.AllenN. E. (2014). Construct validity of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A mixed-method investigation of women’s intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 4, 477–490.
SaundersD. G. (1992). Woman battering. In AmmermanR.HersenM. (Eds.), Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal sourcebook (pp. 208–235). New York, NY: Wiley.
42.
SchaferJ.CaetanoR.ClarkC. L. (2002). Agreement about violence in U.S. couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 457–470. doi:10.1177/0886260502017004007
43.
SchluterP. J.PatersonJ.FeehanM. (2007). Prevalence and concordance of interpersonal violence reports from intimate partners: Findings from the Pacific Islands Families Study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61, 625–630.
44.
StrausM. A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 252–275. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.004
45.
StrausM. A. (2011). Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 279–288.
46.
StrausM. A.HambyS.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.
47.
StrausM. A.HambyS.WarrenW. L. (2003). The conflict tactics scales handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
48.
SugarmanD. B.HotalingG. T. (1997). Intimate violence and social desirability: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 275–290.
49.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Justice.
50.
TolmanR. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–177.
51.
VagiK. J.O’Malley OlsenE.BasileK. C.Vivolo-KantorA. M. (2015). Teen dating violence (physical and sexual) among us high school students: Findings from the 2013 national youth risk behavior survey. JAMA Pediatrics, 169, 474–482. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3577
52.
WinnP. (2001). Dictionary of biological psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
WinstokZ. (2017). Critical review of Hamby’s (2014) article titled “Intimate partner and sexual violence research, scientific progress, scientific challenges, and gender”. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18, 134–144.
54.
WolfeD.ScottK.Reitzel-JaffeD.WekerleC.GrasleyC.StraatmanA. (2001). Development and validation of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13, 277–293.
55.
Wolitzky-TaylorK.RuggieroK. J.DanielsonC.ResnickH.HansonR.SmithD.…KilpatrickD. (2008). Prevalence and correlates of dating violence in a national sample of adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 755–762.
56.
ZwickR.CarlsteinE.BudescuD. V. (1987). Measures of similarity among fuzzy concepts: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1, 221–242. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0888-613X(87)90015-6
