Numerous meta-analyses and reviews have been conducted on the effectiveness of psychological treatment of sexual offenders in reducing recidivism, but no meta-analysis has been done on sexual offenders against children (SOAC) specifically. A moderate treatment effect has been shown in several evaluations of general sexual offenders, while many scholars maintain that the question remains unanswered until an adequate number of effectiveness studies with a strong research design have been carried out. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated 14 studies selected and coded according to Collaborative Outcome Data Committee (CODC) criteria. They included 1,421 adult offenders in psychotherapy and 1,509 nontreated controls, with a minimum average follow-up period of 3 years, published in peer-reviewed journals in 1980 or later. Recidivism was defined as rearrest or reconviction. Study quality was classified into strong, good, weak or rejected. The analysis revealed a treatment effect size of r = .03 for nine studies evaluated as Good or Weak, while all studies yielded an effect size of r = .08, including five studies classified as Rejected. The results show that the available research cannot establish any effect of treatment on SOAC. Despite a large amount of research, only a tiny fraction of studies meet a minimum of scientific standards, and even fewer provide sensible and useful data from which it is possible to draw conclusions.
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies that are included in the meta-analysis.
2.
AbracenJ.LoomanJ. (2004). Issues in the treatment of sexual offenders: Recent developments and directions for future research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 229–246. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00074-X
3.
AbracenJ.LoomanJ.LangtonC. M. (2008). Treatment of sexual offenders with psychopathic traits: Recent research developments and clinical implications. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 9, 144–166. doi:10.1177/1524838008319633
4.
AlexanderM. A. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 101–116. doi:10.1007/BF02658841
5.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
6.
AosS.PhippsP.BarnoskiR.LiebR. (2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime. Olympia, DC: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
*BatesA.FalshawL.CorbettC.PatelV.FriendshipC. (2004). A follow-up study of sex offenders treated by Thames Valley Sex Offender Groupwork Programme, 1995–1999. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10, 29–38. doi:10.1080/13552600410001667724
9.
BilbyC.Brooks-GordonB.WellsH. (2006). A systematic review of psychological interventions for sexual offenders II: Quasi-experimental and qualitative data. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 17, 467–484. doi:10.1080/14789940600819366
10.
BorduinC. M.SchaefferC. M.HeiblumN. (2009). A randomized clinical trial of multisystemic therapy with juvenile sexual offenders: effects on youth social ecology and criminal activity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 26–37. doi:10.1037/a0013035
Brooks-GordonB.BilbyC.WellsH. (2006). A systematic review of psychological interventions for sexual offenders I: Randomised control trials. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 17, 442–466. doi:10.1080/14789940600819341
13.
ChungD.O’LearyP. J.HandT. (2006). Sexual violence offenders: Prevention and intervention approaches. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault. Retrieved fromhttp://apo.org.au/node/8388
14.
Collaborative Outcome Data Committee. (2007a). Sexual offender treatment outcome research: CODC guidelines for evaluation. Part 1: Introduction and overview (p. 15). Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved fromhttp://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/CODC_07_e.pdf
15.
Collaborative Outcome Data Committee. (2007b). The collaborative outcome data committee’s guidelines for the evaluation of sexual offender treatment outcome research. Part 2: CODC guidelines (p. 93). Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved fromhttp://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/codc-eng.aspx
16.
Collin-VézinaD.HélieS.TrocméN. (2010). Is child sexual abuse declining in Canada? An analysis of child welfare data. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 807–812.
CraigL. A.BrowneK. D.StringerI. (2003). Treatment and sexual offence recidivism. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 70–89. doi:10.1177/1524838002238946
19.
*CraissatiJ.SouthR.BiererK. (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of community sex offender treatment in relation to risk and re-offending. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 769–784. doi:10.1080/14789940903174105
20.
DorenD. M.YatesP. M. (2008). Effectiveness of sex offender treatment for psychopathic sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 234–245. doi:10.1177/0306624X07303914
FortuneC.-A.LambieI. (2006). Sexually abusive youth: A review of recidivism studies and methodological issues for future research. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 1078–1095. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.12.007
24.
FurbyL.WeinrottM. R.BlackshawL. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 3–30.
25.
GallagherC. A.WilsonD. B.HirschfieldP.CoggeshallM. B.MacKenzieD. L. (1999). A quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3, 19–29.
26.
GelbK. (2007). Recidivism of sex offenders research paper. Melbourne, Australia: Sentencing Advisory Council.
27.
GreenR. (2002). Is pedophilia a mental disorder?Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 467–471.
28.
GrossmanL. S.MartisB.FichtnerC. G. (1999). Are sex offenders treatable? A research overview. Psychiatric Services, 50, 349–361.
29.
HallG. C. N. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A Meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802–809. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.802
30.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders. A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865–891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545
31.
HansonR. K.BussièreM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.
32.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J. R.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169–194. doi:10.1177/107906320201400207
33.
*HansonR. K.SteffyR. A.GauthierR. (1993). Long-term recidivism of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 646–652. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.646
34.
HemphillJ. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–79.
35.
HollinC. R. (1999). Treatment programs for offenders. Meta-analysis, “what works,” and beyond. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 361–372.
36.
HollinC. R. (2008). Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: Does only randomization glister?Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8, 89–106. doi:10.1177/1748895807085871
37.
KellyR. (1982). Behavioral reorientation of pedophiliacs: Can it be done?Clinical Psychology Review, 2, 387–408. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(82)90020-4
38.
KenworthyT.AdamsC. E.BilbyC.Brooks-GordonB.FentonM. (2003). Psychological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004858
39.
KilmannP. R.SabalisR. F.GearingM. L.BukstelL. H.ScovernA. W. (1982). The treatment of sexual paraphilias: A review of the outcome research. Journal of Sex Research, 18, 193–252. doi:10.1080/00224498209551150
40.
KongstadA. (2006). Effekten af behandling for seksualkriminelle – et litteraturstudie. København, Danmark: Forskningsafdeling III Det Juridiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet.
41.
KongstadA. (2007). Unge der begår seksuelle overgreb. Litteraturgennemgang og diskussion. København, Danmark: Forskningsafdeling III Det Juridiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet.
42.
LaaksonenT.SariolaH.JohanssonA.JernP.VarjonenM.von der PahlenB.SanttilaP. (2011). Changes in the prevalence of child sexual abuse, its risk factors, and their associations as a function of age cohort in a Finnish population sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 480–490.
43.
*LambieI.StewartM. W. (2012). Community solutions for the community’s problem: An evaluation of three New Zealand community-based treatment programs for child sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 1022–1036. doi:10.1177/0306624X11420099
44.
LievoreD. (2004). Recidivism of sexual assault offenders: Rates, risk factors and treatment efficacy acknowledgments. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.
45.
LöselF.SchmuckerM. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117–146. doi:10.1007/s11292-004-6466-7
46.
LångströmN.EnebrinkP.LaurénE.-M.LindblomJ.WerköS.HansonR. K. (2013). Preventing sexual abusers of children from reoffending: systematic review of medical and psychological interventions. British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.), 347, f4630.
47.
MacgregorS. (2008). Sex offender treatment programs: Effectiveness of prison and community based programs in Australia and New Zealand. Canberra, Australia: Indigenous Justice Clearinghouse. Retrieved fromhttp://www.indigenousjustice.gov.au
48.
MalónA. (2012). Pedophilia: A diagnosis in search of a disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1083–1097. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9919-5
49.
*MarquesJ. K.NelsonC.AlarconJ.-M.DayD. M. (2000). Preventing relapse in sex offenders. What we learned from SOTEP’s experimental treatment program. In LouisD. R.HudsonS. M. (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook(pp. 321–340). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
*MarshallW. L.BarbareeH. E. (1988). An outpatient treatment program for child molesters. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 205–214. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb50864.x
51.
MarshallW. L.JonesR.WardT.JohnstonP.BarbareeH. E. (1991). Treatment outcome with sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 465–485. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(91)90119-F
52.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E. (2007). The utility of the random controlled trial for evaluating sexual offender treatment: The gold standard or an inappropriate strategy?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 175–191. doi:10.1177/107906320701900207
53.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E. (2008). Good clinical practice and the evaluation of treatment: A response to Seto et al. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 256–260.
54.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E. (2010). Can treatment be effective with sexual offenders or does it do harm? A response to Hanson (2010) and Rice (2010). Sexual Offender Treatment, 5, 1–8.
55.
MarshallW. L.PithersW. D. (1994). A reconsideration of treatment outcome with sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 10–27. doi:10.1177/0093854894021001003
56.
MarshallW. L.SerranG.MouldenH.MulloyR.FernandezY. M.MannR.ThorntonD. (2002). Therapist features in sexual offender treatment: Their reliable identification and influence on behaviour change. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9, 395–405.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB. L.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The safer society 2009 North American survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
59.
*McGrathR. J.HokeS. E.VojtisekJ. E. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of sex offenders a treatment comparison and long-term follow-up study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 203–225. doi:10.1177/0093854898025002004
60.
*NicholaichukT. P.GordonA.GuD.WongS. (2000). Outcome of an institutional sexual offender treatment program: A comparison between treated and matched untreated offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 139–153. doi:10.1023/A:1009542208305
61.
Ó CiardhaC. (2011). A theoretical framework for understanding deviant sexual interest and cognitive distortions as overlapping constructs contributing to sexual offending against children. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 493–502. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.05.001
62.
O’DonohueW.RegevL. G.HagstromA. (2000). Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 95–105.
63.
PerkinsD.HammondS.ColesD.BishoppD. (1998). Review of sex offender treatment programmes. Broadmoor, England: High Security Psychiatric Services Commissioning Board.
64.
*PithersW. D.CummingG. F. (1989). Can relapses be prevented?: Initial outcome data from the Vermont treatment program for sexual aggressors. In LawsD. R. (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 313–325). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Retrieved fromhttp://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1989-98239-025
65.
PolizziD. M.MacKenzieD. L.HickmanL. J. (1999). What works in adult sex offender treatment? A review of prison-and non-prison-based treatment programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 357–374. doi:10.1177/0306624X99433008
66.
PrentkyR. A.LeeA. F.KnightR. A.CerceD. (1997). Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: a methodological analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 635–659.
67.
*ProcterE. (1996). A five year outcome evaluation of a community-based treatment programme for convicted sexual offenders run by the probation service. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 2, 3–16. doi:10.1080/13552609608413253
68.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.LalumièreM. L. (1993). Assessing treatment efficacy in outcome studies of sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 512–523. doi:10.1177/088626093008004006
69.
*QuinseyV. L.KhannaA.MalcolmP. B. (1998). A retrospective evaluation of the regional treatment centre sex offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 621–644. doi:10.1177/088626098013005005
70.
ReidS.WilsonN. J.BoerD. P. (2011). Risk, needs, and responsivity principles in action: Tailoring rapist’s treatment to rapist typologies. In BoerD. P.EherR.CraigL. A.MinerM. H.PfäfflinF. (Eds.), International perspectives on the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: Theory, practice, and research. (pp. 287–297). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
71.
ReitzelL. R.CarbonellJ. L. (2006). The effectiveness of sexual offender treatment for juveniles as measured by recidivism: a meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 401–421.
72.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2003). The size and sign of treatment effects in sex offender therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 428–440. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12839916
73.
*ScaloraM. J.GarbinC. (2003). A multivariate analysis of sex offender recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 309–323. doi:10.1177/0306624X03047003005
74.
SetoM. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation?Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 231–236.
75.
SetoM. C.MarquesJ. K.HarrisG. T.ChaffinM.LalumiereM. L.MinerM. H.QuinseyV. L. (2008). Good science and progress in sex offender treatment are intertwined: A response to Marshall and Marshall (2007). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 247–255.
76.
Soilevuo GrønnerødJ.GrønnerødC.GrøndahlP. (2013). Effekt av psykologisk behandling på tilbakefall hos seksuelle overgripere mot barn. En meta-analytisk studie og sammendrag av forskningslitteratur. [Effects of psychological treatment on recidivism in sexual offenders against children. A meta-analytical study and a literature review.]Unpublished report. Center for research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo.
77.
Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU). (2011). Medicinska och psykologiska metoder för att förebygga sexuella övergrepp mot barn. Stockholm, Sweden: Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering.
78.
WalkerD. F.McGovernS. K.PoeyE. L.OtisK. E. (2004). Treatment effectiveness for male adolescent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis and review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13, 281–293.
79.
WareJ. (2011). The Importance of contextual issues within sexual offender treatment. In BoerD. P.EherR.CraigL. A.MinerM. H.PfäfflinF. (Eds.), International perspectives on the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: Theory, practice, and research. (pp. 299–312). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
WillisG. M.JohnstonL. (2012). Planning helps: The impact of release planning on subsequent re-entry experiences of child sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18, 194–208. doi:10.1080/13552600.2010.506576
82.
WillisG. M.WardT. (2011). Striving for a good life: The good lives model applied to released child molesters. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 290–303. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.505349
83.
WilsonR. J.McWhinnieA.PichecaJ. E.PrinzoM.CortoniF. (2007). Circles of support and accountability: Engaging community volunteers in the management of high risk sexual offenders. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00450.x, 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00450.x
84.
*WoodrowA. C.BrightD. A. (2011). Effectiveness of a sex offender treatment programme: A risk band analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 43–55. doi:10.1177/0306624X09352162
85.
*ZgobaK. M.LevensonJ. (2008). Variations in the recidivism of treated and nontreated sexual offenders in New Jersey: An examination of three time frames. Victims and Offenders, 3, 10–30.
