The assessment of criminal recidivism risk among adolescents who have offended sexually is a complex task with significant implications for the adolescent and the community. We reviewed the empirical and professional literature on factors associated with criminal recidivism in adolescents who have offended sexually. Sup-ported, promising, possible, and unlikely risk factors are presented and findings are contrasted against the extensive data available for adults who offend sexually and adolescent criminality in general. Limitations with the existing literature are noted, such as shortage of validated risk factors for qualitative aspects of reoffending and research specifically with females and ethnic minorities. Recent attempts to combine evidence-based risk factors with case-specific clinical considerations into structured professional or empirically guided judgment formats are presented. We conclude with suggesting practical strategies for the assessment and communication of recidivism risk.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA). (2001). Practice standards and guidelines for members of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. Beaverton, OR: Author.
2.
Beech, A., Friendship, C., Erikson, M., & Hanson, R. K. (2002). The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of U.K. child abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 155-167.
3.
Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20. Burnaby, Canada: The Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
4.
Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., Blaske, D. M., & Stein, R. J. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sex-ual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 34, 105-113.
5.
Borowsky, I. M., Hogan, M., & Ireland, M. (1997). Adolescent sexual aggression: Risk and protective factors. Pediatricis, 100, e6. Retrieved from www.pediatrics.org
6.
Borum, R. (2000). Assessing violence risk among youth. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 1263-1288.
7.
Bremer, J. F. (1998). Challenges in the assessment and treatment of sexually abusive adolescents. Irish Journal of Psychology, 19, 82-92.
8.
Butler, S. M., & Seto, M. (2002). Distinguishing two types of adolescent sex offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 83-90.
9.
Butz, C., & Spaccarelli, S. (1999). Use of physical force as an offense characteristic in subtyping juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 217-232.
10.
Calder, M. C., Hanks, H., & Epps, K. J. (1997). Juveniles and children who sexually abuse: A guide to risk assessment. Lyme Regis, U.K.: Russell House Publishing.
11.
Cottle, C. C., Lee, R. J., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 367-394.
12.
Doren, D. M. (2002). The state of recidivism risk assessment (ATSA newsletter). The Forum, 14(2), 4-5.
13.
Dvoskin, J. A., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). Risk assessment and release decision making: Toward resolving the great debate. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 6-10.
14.
Epps, K. J. (1997). Managing risk. In M. S. Hoghughi, S. R. Bhate, & F. Graham (Eds.), Working with sexually abusive adolescents (pp. 35-51). London: Sage.
15.
Forth, A. E., Kosson, D., & Hare, R. D. (in press). The Hare Pychopathy Checklist: Youth Version. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
16.
Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician. Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
Gray, A. S., & Pithers, W. D. (1993). Relapse prevention with sexually aggressive adolescents and children: Expanding treatment and supervision. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 289-319). New York: Guilford.
18.
Gretton, H. M., McBride, M., Hare, R. D., O'Shaughnessy, R., & Kumka, G. (2001). Psychopathy and recidivism in adolescent sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 427-449.
19.
Grubin, D. (1999). Actuarial and clinical assessment of risk in sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 331-343.
20.
Hagan, M. P., & Cho, M. E. (1996). A comparison of treatment outcomes between adolescent rapists and child sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40, 113-122.
21.
Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report 97-04). Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
22.
Hanson, R. K. (1998). What do we know about sex offender risk assessment? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 50-72.
23.
Hanson, R. K. (2000). Risk assessment. Beaverton, OR: ATSA.
24.
Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
25.
Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effective-ness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
26.
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). The Sex Offender Need Assessment Rating (SONAR): A method for measuring change in risk levels (User Report 2000-1). Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
27.
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 105-122.
28.
Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sexual offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
29.
Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
30.
Heilbrun, K. (1997). Prediction versus management models relevant to risk assessment: The importance of legal decision-making context. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 347-359.
31.
Heilbrun, K., Dvoskin, J., Hart, S., & McNiel, D. (1999). Violence risk communication: Implications for research, policy, and practice. Health, Risk & Society, 1, 91-106.
32.
Hoge, R. D. (2002). Standardized instruments for assessing risk and need in youthful offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 380-396.
33.
Hudson, S. M., Wales, D. S., Bakker, L., & Ward, T. (2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama Evaluation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 103-119.
34.
Hunter, J. A., & Lexier, L. J. (1998). Ethical and legal issues in the assessment and treatment of juvenile sex offenders. Child Maltreatment, 3, 339-348.
35.
Jung, S., & Rawana, E. P. (1999). Risk and need assessment with juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 69-89.
36.
Kahn, T. J., & Chambers, H. J. (1991). Assessing reoffense risk with juvenile sexual offenders. Child Welfare, 70, 333-345.
37.
Kenny, D. T., Keogh, T., & Seidler, K. (2001). Predictors of recidivism in Australian juvenile sex offenders: Implications for treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 131-148.
38.
Lab, S. P., Shields, G., & Schondel, C. (1993). Research note: An evaluation of juvenile sexual offender treatment. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 543-553.
39.
Lane, S. (1997). Assessment of sexually abusive youth. In G. Ryan & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes, consequences, and correction (Revised ed.; pp. 219-263). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Långström, N. (2002). Long-term follow-up of criminal recidivism in young sex offenders: Temporal patterns and risk factors. Psychology, Crime and Law, 8, 41-58.
41.
Långström, N., & Grann, M. (2000). Risk for criminal recidivism among young sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 855-871.
42.
Lee, R. J., Cottle, C. C., & Heilbrun, K. (2003). The prediction of recidivism in juvenile sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
43.
Leschied, A. W., Cummings, A., Van Brunschot, M., Cunningham, A., & Saunders, A. (2000). Female adolescent aggression: A review of the literature and the correlates of aggression (User Report 2000-4). Ottawa, Canada: Solicitor General of Canada.
44.
Leversee, T., & Pearson, C. (2001). Eliminating the pendulum effect: A balanced approach to the assessment, treatment, and management of sexually abusive youth. Journal of the Center for Families, Children & the Courts, 3, 45-57.
45.
Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adult-hood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86-105). London: Sage.
46.
Marshall, W. L., & Serran, G. A. (2000). Improving the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 1, 203-222.
47.
Mazur, T., & Michael, P. M. (1992). Outpatient treatment for adolescents with sexually inappropriate behaviour: Program description and 6-month follow-up. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 18, 191-203.
48.
Moretti, M., & Odgers, C. (2002). Aggressive and violent girls: Prevalence, profiles, and contributing factors. In R. R. Corrado, R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. K. Gierowski (Eds.), Multi-problem violent youth: A foundation for comparative research on needs, interventions, and outcomes (Vol. 324, pp. 116-129). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press
49.
Morris, R. E., Anderson, M. M., & Knox, G. W. (2002). Incarcerated adolescents' experiences as perpetrators of sexual assault. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 156, 831-835.
50.
Perry, G. P., & Orchard, J. (1992). Assessment and treatment of adolescent sex offenders. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange, Inc.
51.
Prentky, R., Harris, B., Frizzell, K., & Righthand, S. (2000). An actuarial procedure for assessing risk with juvenile sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 1(2), 71-93.
52.
Prentky, R., & Righthand, S. (2001). The Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (J-SOAP) Manual. Unpublished manuscript.
53.
Proulx, J., McKibben, A., & Richard, L. (1996). Relation-ships between affective components and sexual behaviors in sexual aggressors. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research & Treatment, 8, 279-289.
54.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55.
Rasmussen, L. A. (1999). Factors related to recidivism among juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 69-85.
56.
Rich, P. (2001). J-RAT: Juvenile (Clinical) Risk Assessment Tool—Assessment of risk for sexual reoffending. Unpublished manuscript, Stetson School, Inc., Barre, MA.
57.
Richardson, G., & Graham, F. (1997). Relapse prevention. In M. S. Hoghugi, S. R. Bhate, & F. Graham (Eds.), Working with sexually abusive adolescents (pp. 162-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Ross, J., & Loss, P. (1991). Assessment of the juvenile sex offender. In G. D. Ryan, & S. L. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes, consequences, and correction (pp. 199-251). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
59.
Schram, D. D., Milloy, C. D., & Rowe, W. E. (1992, July). Juvenile sex offenders: A follow-up study of reoffense behavior. Interchange, pp. 1-3.
60.
Simourd, L., & Andrews, D. A. (1994). Correlates of delinquency: A look at gender differences. Forum on Corrections Research, 6, 26-31.
61.
Sipe, R., Jensen, E. L., & Everett, R. S. (1998). Adolescent sexual offenders grown up: Recidivism in young adult-hood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 109-124.
62.
Sjöstedt, G., & Grann, M. (2002). Risk assessment: What is being predicted by actuarial prediction instruments? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 179-183.
63.
Smith, W. R., & Monastersky, C. (1986). Assessing juvenile sexual offenders' risk for reoffending. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 115-140.
64.
Statistics Canada. (1993). The Violence Against Women Survey. Ottawa, Canada: Author.
65.
Steen, C., & Monnette, B. (1989). Treating adolescent sex offenders in the community. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
66.
Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 139-153.
67.
Way, I. F., & Spieker, S. D. (1997). Cycle of offense: A frame-work for treating adolescent sexual offenders. Notre Dame, IN: Jalice Publishers.
68.
Wenet, G. A., & Clark, T. F. (1986). The Oregon report on juvenile sexual offenders. Salem, OR: Children Services Division, Department of Human Resources, State of Oregon.
69.
Worling, J. R. (1998). Adolescent sexual offender treatment at the SAFE-T Program. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders (pp. 353-365). New York: Plenum.
70.
Worling, J. R. (2002). Assessing risk of sexual assault recidivism with adolescent sexual offenders. In M. C. Calder (Ed.), Young people who sexually abuse: Building the evidence base for your practice (pp. 365-375). Lyme Regis, U.K.: Russell House Publishing.
71.
Worling, J. R. (2003). The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): Preliminary psychometric data. Manuscript submitted for publication.
72.
Worling, J. R., & Curwen, T. (2000). Adolescent sexual offender recidivism: Success of specialized treatment and implications for risk prediction. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 965-982.
73.
Worling, J. R., & Curwen, T. (2001). Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (The ERASOR—Version 2.0). In M. C. Calder (Ed.), Juveniles and children who sexually abuse: Frameworks for assessment (pp. 372-397). Lyme Regis, U.K.: Russell House Publishing.
74.
Zolondek, S. C., Abel, G. G., Northey, W. F., & Jordan, A. D. (2001). The self-reported behaviors of juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 73-85.
