Feminist theorists in law and the social sciences have questioned the appropriateness of using the methods of their disciplines as tools for bettering the lives of women who have experienced domestic violence. The authors begin with a brief review of the major feminist critiques within these two domains. They explore the assumptions on which both are based and provide examples of how well-meaning attempts to use these disciplines in the area of domestic violence have fallen short of their goals. They then show how the problematic assumptions of both disciplines may be worsened when research on domestic violence is done within the context of the criminal justice system using the example of the mandatory arrest experiments. They conclude that research and the law should come together only under conditions where feminist critiques are taken seriously and the perspectives of women who are the victims of these offenses are placed at the center of the work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkins, S., [#x0026] Hogett, B. (1984). Women and the law. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
2.
Backhouse, C. (1991). Petticoats and prejudice: Women and law in nineteenth-century Canada. Toronto, Canada: Women[#x2019]s Press.
3.
Barata, P. C. (1999). Battered women[#x2019]s evaluations of two criminal justice policies designed to arrest and prosecute more batterers. Unpublished master[#x2019]s thesis, University of Windsor, Ontario.
4.
Bennett, L., Goodman, L., [#x0026] Dutton, M. A. (1999). Systemic obstacles to the criminal prosecution of a battering partner. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 761-772.
5.
Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., [#x0026] Western, B. (1992). The deterent effect of arrest in incidence of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 57, 698-708.
6.
Bourg, S., [#x0026] Stock, H. V. (1994). A review of domestic violence arrest statistics in a police department using a pro-arrest policy: Are pro-arrest policies enough? Journal of Family Violence, 9, 177-189.
7.
Bowman, C. G. (1992). The arrest experiments: A feminist critique. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 201-208.
8.
Burt, M., Newmark, L., Norris, M., Dyer, D., [#x0026] Harrell, A. 1996. The violence against women act of 1994: Evaluation of the STOP block grant to combat violence against women. Retrieved July 19, 2002, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/reports/96Guides/Act/welcome.html
9.
Busby, K. (1999). [#x201C]Not a victim until a conviction is entered[#x201D]: Sexual violence prosecutions and legal [#x201C]truth. [#x201D] In E. Comack (Ed.), Locating the law: Race/class/gender connections. (pp. 260-288). Halifax, Canada: Fernwood
10.
Buzawa, E. S., [#x0026] Buzawa, C. G. (1993). The impact of arrest on domestic violence. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 558-574.
11.
Buzawa, E. S., [#x0026] Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Byrne, C., Kilpatrick, D. G., Howley, S. S., [#x0026] Beatty, D. (1999). Female victims of partner versus nonpartner violence: Experiences with the criminal justice system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 275-293.
13.
Chunn, D. E. (1999). Feminism, law, and [#x201C]the family[#x201D]: Assessing the reform legacy. In E. Comack (Ed.), Locating the law: Race/class/gender connections (pp. 236-259). Halifax, Canada: Fernwood.
14.
Comack, E. (1999). Theoretical excursions. In E. Comack (Ed.), Locating law: Race/class/gender connections (pp. 19-86). Halifax, Canada: Fernwood.
15.
Coulter, M. L., [#x0026] Chez, R. A. (1997). Domestic violence victims support mandatory reporting: For others. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 349-356.
16.
Cretney, A., [#x0026] Davis, G. (1997). Prosecuting domestic assault: Victims failing courts or courts failing victims? Howard Journal, 36(2), 146-157.
17.
Dawson, B. T. (1994). Relating to law: A chronology of women and law in Canada (2nd ed.). North York, Canada: Captus Press.
18.
Defina, M. P., [#x0026] Wetherbee, L. (1997). Advocacy and law enforcement: Partners against domestic violence. Retrieved July 19, 2002, from http://www.fbi.gov/publications/leb/1997/oct974.htm
19.
Dobash, R. E., [#x0026] Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
20.
Dobash, R. E., [#x0026] Dobash, R. P. (1988). Research as social action: The struggle for battered women. In K. A. Yllo [#x0026] M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 51-74). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
21.
Dobash, R. E., [#x0026] Dobash, R. P. (1990a). How theoretical definitions and perspectives affect research and policy. In D. J. Besharov (Ed.), Family violence: Research and policy issues (pp. 108-129). Washington, DC: AEI Press.
22.
Dobash, R. P., [#x0026] Dobash, R. E. (1990b). How research makes a difference to policy and practice. In D. J.Besharov (Ed.), Family violence: Research and policy issues(pp. 185-204). Washington, DC: AEI Press.
23.
Dobash, R. E., [#x0026] Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence, and social change. London: Routledge.
24.
Du Bois, B. (1983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social science. In G. Bowles [#x0026] R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women[#x2019]s studies (pp. 105-115). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
25.
Dutton, M. A. 1997. Critique of the [#x201C]Battered Woman Syndrome[#x201D] model. Retrieved July 2002 from http://www.vaw.umn.edu/finaldocuments/vawnet/bws.htm
26.
Eisikovits, Z., [#x0026] Peled, E. (1990). Qualitative research on spouse abuse. In D. J. Besharov (Ed.), Family violence: Research and policy issues. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
27.
Ellis, R. (1980). The legal wrongs of battered women. In Z. Bankowski [#x0026] G. Mungham (Eds.), Essays in law and society (pp. 143-156). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
28.
Erez, E., [#x0026] Belknap, J. (1998). In their own words: Battered women[#x2019]s assessment of the criminal processing system[#x2019]s responses. Violence and Victims, 13, 251-268.
29.
Faubert, J., [#x0026] Hinch, R. (1996). The dialectics of mandatory arrest policies. In T. O[#x2019]Reilly-Fleming (Ed.), Post-critical criminology (pp. 230-251). Scarborough, Canada: Prentice Hall Canada.
30.
Fischer, K., [#x0026] Rose, M. (1995). When [#x201C]enough is enough[#x201D]: Battered women[#x2019]s decision making around court orders of protection. Crime and Delinquency, 41(4), 414-429.
31.
Fleury, R. E. (2000). Survivors[#x2019] satisfaction with the criminal legal system response to intimate partner violence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, Detroit.
32.
Ford, D. A. (1991). Prosecution as a victim power resource: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law and Society Review, 25, 313-334.
33.
Frisch, L. A. (1992). Research that succeeds, policies that fail. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 209-216.
34.
Garner, J., Gagan, F., [#x0026] Maxwell, C. (1995). Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: A critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 3-28.
35.
Gelles, J. (1993). Constraints against family violence. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 575-586.
36.
Gielen, A. C., O[#x2019]Campo, P. J., Campbell, J. C., Schollenberger, J., Woods, A. B., Jones, A. S., et al. (2000). Women[#x2019]s opinions about domestic violence screening and mandatory reporting. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 19, 279-285.
37.
Gondolf, E. W. (1998). The victims of court-ordered batterers: Their victimization, helpseeking, and perceptions. Violence Against Women, 4(6), 659-676.
38.
Hale, D. C., [#x0026] Menniti, D. J. (1995). The battered woman syndrome as legal defense: Status in the courtroom. In A. V. Merlo [#x0026] J. M. Pollock (Eds.), Women, law, and social control (pp. 203-217). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn [#x0026] Bacon.
39.
Horton, A. L., Simonidis, K. M., [#x0026] Simonidis, L. L. (1987). Legal remedies for spousal abuse: Victim characteristics, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 265-279.
40.
Hoyle, C., [#x0026] Sanders, A. (2000). Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment? British Journal of Criminology, 40, 14-36.
41.
Hutchison, I. W., [#x0026] Hirschel, J. D. (1998). Abused women: Help-seeking strategies and police utilization. Violence Against Women, 4, 436-456.
42.
Jaffe, P., Wolfe, D. A., Teleford, A., [#x0026] Austin, G. (1986). The impact of police charges in incidents of wife abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 1, 37-49.
43.
Jayaratne, T. E. (1983). The value of quantitative methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles [#x0026] R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women[#x2019]s studies (pp. 140-161). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
44.
Judge blames lewd t-shirt worn by wife for provoking assault by her husband. (1990, July 15). Toronto Sunday Star, p. A1.
45.
Kelly, L. (1988). How women define their experiences of violence. In K. Yllo [#x0026] M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 114-132). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Klein, R. D. (1983). How we do what we want to do: Thoughts about feminist methodology. In G. Bowles [#x0026] R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women[#x2019]s studies (pp. 88-104). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
47.
Lakeman, L. (2000). Why [#x201C]law and order[#x201D] cannot end violence against women; and why the development of women[#x2019]s (social, economic and political and civil) rights might. Canadian Woman Studies, 20, 24-33.
48.
Landau, T. C. (2000). Women[#x2019]s experiences with mandatory charging for wife assault in Ontario Canada: A case against the prosecution. International Review of Victimology, 7, 141-157.
49.
Landrine, H. (1995). Introduction: Cultural diversity, contextualism, and feminist psychology. In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50.
Lerman, L. (1992). The decontextualization of domestic violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 217-240.
51.
Lewis, R., Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., [#x0026] Cavanagh, K. D. (2000). Protection, prevention, rehabilitation or justice? Women[#x2019]s use of the law to challenge domestic violence. International Review of Victimology, 7, 179-205.
52.
London Family Court Clinic Inc. 1991. Wife assault as a crime: The perspectives of victims and police officers on a charging policy in London, Ontario from 1980-1990 (Department of Justice Canada, Research and Statistics Division Report No. WD 1991-13a). Retrieved November 2001 from http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/rs/rep/wd91-13a-e.pdf
53.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs: The Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 8, 635-658.
54.
Malecha, A. T., Lemmey, D., McFarlane, J., Willson, P., Fredland, N., Gist, J., et al. (2000). Mandatory reporting of intimate partner violence: Safety or retaliatory abuse for women. Journal of Women[#x2019]s Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 9, 75-78.
55.
Marshall, S. (1997). Feminists and the state: A theoretical exploration. In C. R. Daniels (Ed.), Feminists negotiate the state: The politics of domestic violence (pp. 95-107). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
56.
Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. San Francisco: Glide.
57.
McCann, K. (1985). Battered women and the law: The limits of the legislation. In J. Brophy [#x0026] C. Smart (Eds.), Women in law: Explorations in law family and sexuality (pp. 71-96). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
58.
Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles [#x0026] R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women[#x2019]s studies (pp. 117-139). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
59.
Pate, K. 1994. Battered Women[#x2019]s Defence Committee update. Retrieved July 2002 from http://www.elizabethfry.ca/bwdcom.htm
60.
Reinharz, S. (1983). Experiential analysis: A contribution to feminist research. In G. Bowles [#x0026] R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women[#x2019]s studies (pp. 162-191). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
61.
Saunders, D. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In K. A. Yllo [#x0026] M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 90-113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62.
Saunders, D. G. (1995). The tendency to arrest victims of domestic violence: A preliminary analysis of officer characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 147-158.
63.
Schechter, S. (1988). Building bridges between activists, professionals, and researchers. In K. A. Yllo [#x0026] M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 299-312). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64.
Schmidt, J. D., [#x0026] Sherman, L. W. (1993). Does arrest deter domestic violence? American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 601-609.
65.
Schneider, E. M. (1980). Equal rights to trial for women: Sex bias in the law of self-defense. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 15, 623-647.
66.
Sherman, L. W., [#x0026] Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
67.
Smart, C. (1977). Women, crime, and criminology. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
68.
Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge.
69.
Smart, C., [#x0026] Brophy, J. (1985). Locating law: A discussion of the place of law in feminist politics. In J. Brophy [#x0026] C. Smart (Eds.), Women in law: Explorations in law, family, and sexuality (pp. 1-20). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
70.
Smith, A. (2000). It[#x2019]s my decision, isn[#x2019]t it? A research note on battered women[#x2019]s perceptions of mandatory intervention laws. Violence Against Women, 6, 1384-1402.
71.
Smith, A. (2001). Domestic violence laws: The voices of battered women. Violence and Victims, 16, 91-111.
72.
>Sparks, A. (1997). Feminists negotiate the executive branch: The policing of male violence. In C. R. Daniels (Ed.), Feminists negotiate the state: The politics of domestic violence (pp. 36-52). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
73.
Stephens, B. J., [#x0026] Sinden, P. G. (2000). Victims[#x2019] voices: Domestic assault victims[#x2019] perceptions of police demeanor. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 534-547.
74.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
75.
Straus, M. A., [#x0026] Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465-479.
76.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., [#x0026] Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
77.
Tim Roberts Focus Consultants. 1996. Spousal assault and mandatory charging in the Yukon: Experiences, perspectives and alternatives (Department of Justice Canada, Research and Statistics Division Report No. WD 1996-3e). Retrieved November 2001 from http://www.canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/rs/rep/wd96-3a-e.html
78.
Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper [#x0026] Row.
79.
Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
80.
Walker, L. E. (1989). Terrifying love: Why battered women kill and how society responds. New York: HarperPerennial.
81.
Walker, L. E. A. (2000). The battered woman syndrome (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
82.
Warrier, B. (1976).Working on wife abuse (1st ed.). (Available from Betsy Warrier, 46 Pleasant St., Cambridge, MA)
83.
Weisz, A. N. (2002). Prosecution of batterers: Views of African American battered women. Violence and Victims, 17, 19-34.
84.
West Coast Women[#x2019]s Legal Education and Action Fund. (2001). Transforming women[#x2019]s future: A guide to equality rights theory and action. Vancouver, Canada: Author.
85.
Wiist, W. H., [#x0026] McFarlane, J. (1998). Utilization of police by abused pregnant Hispanic women. Violence Against Women, 4, 677-693.
86.
Wilson, B. (1992). Family violence. Canadian Journal of Women and Law, 5, 137-141.
87.
Wolf, M. E., Holt, V. L., Kernie, M. A., [#x0026] Rivara, F. P. (2000). Who gets protection orders for intimate partner violence? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 286-291.
88.
Yllo, K. (1988). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In K. A. Yllo [#x0026] M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 28-50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
89.
Yllo, K. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles [#x0026] D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
90.
Zorza, J. (1992). The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970-1990. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 46-72.
