Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health concern, and thus it is necessary to obtain accurate estimates of IPV. National surveys use two main methods of data collection: the proxy method and/or a method that obtains information from both members of the couple. There is controversy as to whether couples agree about the occurrence of IPV. Determining the extent to which partners agree about this is essential for gaining accurate prevalence rates. This article reviews literature on agreement within this field. The authors surveyed the major studies that have reported couple-level data. Agreement between the couples has been assessed in all of the reviewed research, with varying results. The majority of studies under consideration suggest that there is disagreement between partners about IPV. The authors propose that agreement levels should be high (indicated by several indexes) if the proxy method is to be used to assess prevalence rates.
Anderson, K. L.
(1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 655-669.
2.
Archer, J.
(1999). Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(12), 1263-1289.
3.
Archer, J.
, & Ray, N. (1989). Dating violence in the United Kingdom: A preliminary study. Aggressive Behavior, 15, 337-343.
4.
Armstrong, T. G
, Heideman, G., Corcoran, K. J., Fisher, B., Medina, K. L., & Schafer, J. (2001). Disagreement about the occurrence of male-to-female intimate partner violence: A qualitative study. Journal of Family and Community Health, 24(1), 55-75.
5.
Bohannon, J. R.
, Dosser, D. A., & Lindley, S. E. (1995). Using couple data to determine domestic violence rates: An attempt to replicate previouswork. Violence and Victims, 10(2), 133-141.
6.
Browne A.
(1993). Violence against women by male partners. American Psychologist, 48, 1077-1087.
7.
Browning, J.
, & Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 375-379.
8.
Cantos, A. I.
, Neidig, P. H., & O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Injuries of women and men in a treatment program for domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 9(2), 113-124.
9.
Cicchetti, D. V.
, & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543-549.
10.
Cohen, J.
(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
11.
Edleson, J. L.
, & Brygger, M. P. (1986). Gender differences in reporting of battering incidences. Family Relations, 35, 377-382.
12.
Fleiss, J. L.
(1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley.
13.
Heckert, D. A.
, & Gondolf, E. W. (2000). Assessing assault self-reports by batterer program participants and their partners. Journal of Family Violence, 15(2), 181-197.
14.
Heise, L.
, Ellsberg, M., & Gottemoeller, M. (1999). Population report: Ending violence against women. Issues in World Health, 27(4), 1-44.
15.
Jouriles, E. N.
, & O'Leary, K. D. (1985). Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(3), 419-421.
16.
Kenny, D. A.
(1998). Couples, gender, and time: Comments on method. In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 410-422). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J.
, & Vivian, D. (1994). The correlates of spouses' incongruent reports of marital aggression. Journal of Family Violence, 9(3), 265-283.
18.
Margolin, G.
(1987). The multiple forms of aggressiveness between marital partners: How do we identify them?Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13(1), 77-84.
19.
McCutcheon, A. L.
(1987). Latent class analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
McLaughlin, I. G.
, Leonard, K. E., & Senchak, M. (1992). Prevalence and distribution of premarital aggression among couples applying for a marriage license. Journal of Family Violence, 7(4), 309-319.
21.
Medina, K. L.
, Schafer, J., Shear, P. K., & Armstrong, T. G. (in press). Memory ability is associated with disagreement about the most recent conflict in polysubstance abusing couples. Journal of Family Violence.
22.
Miller, B. A.
(1990). The interrelationships between alcohol and drugs and family violence. In National Institute on Drug Abuse: Research monograph series (pp. 177-207). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
23.
Moffitt, T. E.
, Caspi, A., Krueger, R., Magdol, L., Margolin, G., Silva, P., et al. (1997). Do partners agree about abuse in the relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 47-56.
24.
O'Leary, K. D.
, & Arias, I. (1988). Assessing agreement of reports of spouse abuse. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kilpatrick, & M. A. Straus(Eds.), Family abuse and its consequences (pp. 218-227). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
O'Leary, K. D.
, Vivian, D., & Malone, J. (1992). Assessment of physical aggression against women in marriage: The need for multimodal assessment. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 5-14.
26.
Riggs, D. S.
, Murphy, C. M, & O'Leary, K. D. (1989). Intentional falsification in reports of interpartner aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4(2), 220-232.
27.
Schafer, J.
, & Caetano, R. (2000, October). Weighting single-partner violence data to estimate dyadic level intimate partner violence data. Paper presented at the 128th American Public Health Association Meeting and Exposition, Boston.
28.
Schafer, J.
, Caetano, R., & Clark, C. L. (1998). Rates of intimate partner violence in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1702-1704.
29.
Schafer, J.
, Caetano, R., & Clark, C. L. (2002). Agreement about violence in U.S. couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(4), 457-470.
30.
Schwartz, M. D.
(2000). Methodological issues in the use of survey data for measuring and characterizing violence against women. Violence Against Women, 6(8), 815-838.
31.
Straus, M. A.
(1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Straus, M. A.
, & Gelles, R. J. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
33.
Straus, M. A.
, & Kantor, G. K. (1994, July 19). Change in spouse assault rates from 1975 to 1992: A comparison of three national surveys in the United States. Paper presented at the 13th World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, Germany.
34.
Szinovacz, M. E.
(1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(3), 633-644.
35.
Szinovacz, M. E.
, & Egley, L. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 995-1010.
36.
Tjaden, P.
, & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
37.
Browning, J.
, & Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 375-379.
38.
O'Leary, K. D.
, & Arias, I. (1988). Assessing agreement of reports of spouse abuse. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kilpatrick, & M. A. Straus(Eds.), Family abuse and its consequences (pp. 218-227). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Schafer, J.
, Caetano, R., & Clark, C. L. (1998). Rates of intimate partner violence in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1702-1704.
40.
Szinovacz, M. E.
(1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(3), 633-644.
41.
Szinovacz, M. E.
, & Egley, L. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 995-1010.
