Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

F.Y. Edgeworth labeled the utility sacrifice theory of taxation the Hedonic Theory of Taxation. According to this model, each household unit should bear a portion of the aggregate tax burden so as to sacrifice the same amount of utility or the same proportion of their utility from income. This was long regarded as an appealing but impractical idea owing to the inability to measure cardinal utility. But the recent ‘Happiness’ survey literature has resulted in credible estimates of a cardinal utility function, and this is used in this paper to apply the hedonic model to the 2010 U.S. Personal Income Tax in a revenue neutral setting. the result is a moderately progressive personal income tax, with a top quintile average rate of about 11% and a top percentile average rate of about 17%, the latter being less than at present. As compared to optimal tax models, hedonic taxation is simple and the notion of equal sacrifice appears to enjoy public support. We find little difference in average rates between equal absolute and equal proportional sacrifice.

Keywords

Utility sacrifice progressive taxation cardinal utility happiness surveys income tax

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker

G.S.

(1991) A Treatise on the Family, enlarged edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Buchanan

J. M.

and Flowers

M. R.

(1987) The Public Finances, An Introductory Textbook, Homewood, IL: Irwin.

Cohen Stuart

A.J.

(1889, 1967) “On Progressive Taxation”, in: Mus-grave

R.A.

and Peacock

A.T.

(eds.) Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, New York: St Martin's Press, pp. 48–71.

Congressional Budget Office (2013) The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes 2010 (http://www.cbo.gov/publication/44604). Also the supplementary Excel files, online.

Edgeworth

F. Y.

(1897, 1967) “The Pure Theory of Taxation”, in: Musgrave

R.A.

and Peacock

A.T.

Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, New York: St Martin's Press, pp. 119–136.

Larrimore

, Mortenson

and Splinter

(2017) Household Income in Tax Data: Using Addresses to Move from Tax Unit to Household Income Distributions, Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017–002, Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Larrimore

, Burkhauser

R.V.

, Auten

and Armour

(2017) Recent Trends in U.S. Top Income Shares in Tax Record Data Using More Comprehensive Measures of Income Including Accrued Capital Gains, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 23007 (http://www.nber.org/papers/w23007).

Layard

, Mayraz

, and Nickell

. (2008) “The Marginal Utility of Income”, Journal of Public Economics, 92(8/9):1846–1857.

Mankiw

N.G.

, Weinzierl

M.C.

and Yagan

D.F.

(2009) “Optimal Taxation in Theory and Practice”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(4):147–174. (http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4263739).

10.

Mirlees

J.A.

(1971) “An Exploration in the Theory of Optimal Taxation,” Review of Economic Studies, 38(2):175–208.

11.

Musgrave

R.A.

(1959) The Theory of Public Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Pollak

R.A.

(2003) “Gary Becker's Contribution to Family and Household Economics”, Review of Economics of the Household, 1(1/2):111–141.

13.

Smeeding

T. M.

and Weinberg

D.H.

(2001) “Toward a Uniform Definition of Household Income”, Review of Income and Wealth, 47(1):1–24.

14.

Van Praag

and Ferrer-I-Carbonell

(2004) Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach, New York: Oxford University Press.

15.

Vitaliano

D.F.

(1973) “A Reconsideration of the Utility Sacrifice Rules of Taxation”, Public Finance Quarterly, 1(1):59–65.

16.

Vitaliano

D.F.

(1977) “The Tax Sacrifice Rules Under Alternative Definitions of Progressivity,” Public Finance Quarterly, 5(4):489–494.

17.

Vitaliano

D.F.

(2010) “Engel Curves and the Unitary Theory of the Household”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(1):69–72.

18.

Weinzierl

(2014) “The Promise of Positive Optimal Taxation: Normative Diversity and a Role for Equal Sacrifice”, Journal of Public Economics, 118:128–142 (http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:16388196).

The Hedonic Theory of Taxation: An Application to the U.S. Income Tax

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References