How Much are Citizen Perceptions of Fiscal Accountability Influenced by Government Transparency,Information Access,and Participation Opportunities?

Abstract

Anecdotal and empirical evidence points to a decline of citizen trust in government in the U.S. Distrust of government related to fiscal matters often occurs because information about accountability is not communicated. This study examines factors that may influence citizen perceptions of their local government's fiscal accountability. We focus specifically on seven local governments in the Hampton Roads, Virginia region of the U.S. We measure citizens’ perception of local government finances using survey responses to five questions related to responsible spending, financial reporting, and educating and informing citizens of government finances. Our study examines the relationship of levels of transparency, information accessibility, and participation opportunities to citizens’ perceptions of government's fiscal accountability. We expect that residents in cities with high levels of transparency and information accessibility and participatory processes will perceive their local government's fiscal accountability more positively. However, our results do not support these expectations since the level of perceived fiscal accountability is non-variant across the cities irrespective of the varying levels of transparency, information accessibility, and participation opportunities. These findings suggest there may be different values associated with a range of administrative activities thought to be critical antecedents for informing and engaging citizens to enhance perceptions of accountability.

Keywords

fiscal accountability transparency public participation popular financial reports

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

C.L

(2011) “Providing a Clearer View: An Examination of Transparency on Local Government Websites”, Government Information Quarterly, 28(1):11–16.

Association of Government Accountants (2008) Public attitudes toward government accountability and transparency, accessed May 5, 2011, (https://www.agacgfm.org/AGA/ToolsResources/CCR/pollreport2008.pdf).

Association of Government Accountants (2010). Public attitudes toward government accountability and trasparency, accessed November 24, 2014, (https://www.agacgfm.org/AGA/ToolsResources/CCR/SurveyWhitePaper10.pdf).

Association of Government Accountants (2011) What do citizens want from public sector reporting? Findings from four focus groups, accessed July 15, 2015, (http://www.agacgfm.org/AGA/Documents/Research/WhatCitizensWant_LeadershipHandbook-1-.pdf).

Association of Government Accountants (2014) Certificate of excellence in CCR, accessed November 28, 2014, (http://www.agacgfm.org/Tools—Resources/Citizen-Centric-Reporting-%28CCR%29/AGA-s-Certificate-of-Excellence-in-Citizen-Centric.aspx).

Beck

P.A.

, Rainey

H.G.

and Traut

(1990) “Disadvantage, Disaffection and Race as Divergent Bases for Citizen Fiscal Policy Preferences”, The Journal of Politics, 51(1):71–93.

Berner

and Smith

(2004) “A Review of State Requirements for Citizen Participation in the Local Government Budget Process”, State and Local Government Review, 36(2):140–150.

Brown

R.D.

(1996) The Strength of a People: The Idea of an Informed Citizenry in America, 1650–1870, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

Bryson

J.M.

, Quick

K.S.

, Slotterback

C.S.

and Crosby

B.C

(2013) “Designing Public Participation Processes”, Public Administration Review, 73(1):23–34.

10.

Cohen

J.E.

(2006) “Citizen Satisfaction with Contacting Government on the Internet”, Information Polity, 11(1):51–65.

11.

Crosby

, Kelly

J.M.

and Schaefer

(1986) “Citizens Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation”, Public Administration Review, 46(2):170–178.

12.

Ebdon

and Franklin

A.L.

(2006) “Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory”, Public Administration Review, 66(3):437–447.

13.

Edmiston

K.D.

(2003) “State and Local E-Government: Prospects and Challenges”, American Review of Public Administration, 33(1):20–45.

14.

Franklin

A.L.

and Carberry-George

(1999) “Analyzing How Local Governments Establish Service Priorities”, Public Budgeting and Finance, 19(3):31–46.

15.

Franklin

A.L.

and Ebdon

(2007) “Democracy, public participation, and budgeting: Mutually exclusive or just exhausting”, in: Box

R.C.

(ed) Democracy and Public Administration, New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 84–106.

16.

Funkhouser

(2013) Giving citizens numbers they can understand, accessed November 28, 2014, (http://www.governing.com/gov-institute/funkhouser/col-citizen-centric-financial-reporting-accountability-transparency.html).

17.

Greitens

T.J.

and Strachan

J.C.

(2011) “E-Government and Citizen Engagement: An Overview of US States' Government Websites”, International Journal of Public Administration, 34(1–2):54–58.

18.

Harder

C.T.

and Jordan

M.M.

(2013) “The Transparency of County Websites: A Content Analysis”, Public Administration Quarterly, 37(1):103–128.

19.

Holzer

(2004) “Restoring trust in government: The potential of digital citizen participaton”, in: Holzer

, Zhang

and Dong

(eds) Frontiers of Public Administration: Proceedings of the Second Sino-U.S. International Conference “Public Administration in the Changing World”, Newark, NJ: National Center for Public Productivity, Rutgers University, pp. 6–23.

20.

Irvin

R.A.

and Stansbury

(2004) “Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort?”, Public Administration Review, 64(1):55–65.

21.

James

(2009) “Evaluating the Expectations Disconfirmation and Expectations Anchoring Approaches to Citizen Satisfaction with Local Public Services”, Journal of Public Administration Resaerch and Theory, 19(1):107–123.

22.

Jun

K.-N.

, Wang

and Wang

(2014) “E-Government Use and Perceived Government Transparency and Service Capacity”, Public Performance and Management Review, 38(1):125–151.

23.

Justice

J.B.

, Melitski

, and Smith

D.L.

(2006) “E-Government as an Instrument of Fiscal Accountability and Responsiveness: Do the Best Practitioners Employ the Best Practices?”, American Review of Public Administration, 36(3):301–322.

24.

Keehley

, Medlin

, MacBride

and Longmire

(1997) Benchmarking for Best Practices in the Public Sector: Achieving Performance Breakthroughs in Federal, State, and Local Agencies, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

25.

King

C.S.

, Feltey

K.M.

and Susel

B.O.N.

(1998) “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, 58(4):317–326.

26.

Lee

and Kwak

Y.H.

(2012) “An Open Government Maturity Model for Social Media-Based Public Engagement”, Government Information Quarterly, 29(4):492–503.

27.

Lee

(2002) “Intersectoral Differences In Public Affairs: The Duty of Public Reporting in Public Administration”, Journal of Public Affairs, 2(2):33–43.

28.

Lewis

C.W.

and Hildreth

W.B.

(2011) Budgeting: Politics and Power, New York: Oxford University Press.

29.

Mossberger

, Tolbert

C.J.

and McNeal

R.S.

(2008) Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

30.

Municipal Research and Services Center (2014) Communicating about government spending (What we get for our dollar?), accessed November 28, 2014 http://www.mrsc.org/subjects/governance/participation/comdollar.aspx.

31.

Obama

(2009) “Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Transparency and Open Government”, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39(3):429.

32.

O'Connell

and Yusuf

J.-E.

(2011) “An Information Model to Present Proposals to Increase Taxes: Two Examples in the Context of American Values”, International Journal of Public Administration, 34(3):180–189.

33.

Pina

, Torres

and Royo

(2010) “Is E-Government Leading to More Accountable and Transparent Local Governments? An overall view”, Financial Accountability and Management, 26(1):3–20.

34.

Poister

T.H.

, Aristigueta

M.P.

and Hall

J.L.

(2014) Managing and Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: An Integrated Approach, San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.

35.

Sharp

, Carpenter

F.H.

and Sharp

R.F.

(1998) “Popular Financial Reports for Citizens”, The CPA Journal, 68(3):34–38.

36.

Simonsen

and Robbins

M.D.

(2000) Citizen Participation in Resource Allocation, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

37.

The Center for California Studies (2013) Civic Engagement Report: Civic Engagement and Local Fiscal Attitudes, 2013 Survey of Californians, Sacramento: California State University.

38.

Thomas

J.C.

(1995) Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

39.

Van Ryzin

and Lavena

(2013) “The Credibility of Government Performance Reporting”, Public Performance and Management Review, 37(1):87–103.

40.

Vigoda-Gadot

(2013) Building Strong Nations: Improving Governability and Public Management. Farnham, VT: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

41.

Walters

(2012) Are comprehensive annual financial reports useless? Accessed April 11, 2014 http://www.governing.com/topics/finance/gov-are-annual-financial-reports-useless.html.

42.

Welch

E.W.

, Hinnant

C.C.

and Moon

M.J.

(2005) “Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3):371–391.

43.

West

(2007) Global e-government, 2007, Providence, RI: Center for Public Policy, Brown University.

44.

Yusuf

J.-E.

and Jordan

M.M.

(2012) “Effective Popular Financial Reports: The Citizen Perspective”, Journal of Government Financial Management, 61(4):44–49.

45.

Yusuf

J.-E.

, Jordan

M.M.

, Neill

K.A.

and Hackbart

(2013) “For the People: Popular Financial Reporting Practices of Local Governments”, Public Budgeting and Finance, 33(1):95–113.