The financial audit process continues to provide insight into the various activities associated with government service provision. Traditionally, the audit process has provided information about the financial position of the unit through an accurate presentation of financial records. Previous research has determined that even with an amalgamation of strict legislation through heavy state oversight and accounting standards, there continues to be a relationship between government characteristics and reporting occurrences. This study undertakes a reexamination of independent auditor findings in professionally administered county governments. Initial findings indicate a substantial decline in overall reporting problems, but an increase in compliance issues. Less experienced finance officers and elevated levels of budget allotments are among the factors that increase the probability of state citation issuance.
BehnB.K., CarcelloJ.V., HermansonD.R. and HermansonR.H. (1997) “The determinants of audit client satisfaction among clients of big six firms”, Accounting Horizons, 11(1):7–24.
2.
CagelC.S. and PridgenA.P. (2015) “Accountability in county governments: Is auditor type related to auditor quality?”, Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 12(1):79–93.
3.
CarcelloJ.V., HermansonR.H. and McGrathN.T. (1992) “Audit quality attributes: The perceptions of audit partners, preparers and financial statement users”, Auditing, 11(1):1–15.
4.
CoeC.K. (2007) “Preventing local government fiscal crises: The North Carolina approach”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(3):39–49.
5.
CopleyP.A. (1989) “The determinants of local government audit fees: Additional evidence”, in: ChanJ. and PattonJ. (eds) Research in Government and Nonprofit Accounting, Volume 5, pp. 27–56, Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press Inc.
6.
CopleyP.A. (1991) “The association between municipal disclosure practices and audit quality”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10: 245–266.
7.
DeisD.A. and GirouxG.A. (1992) “Determinants of audit quality in the public sector”, The Accounting Review, 67(3):462–479.
LowensohnS.H., JohnsonL.E., ElderR.J. and DaviesS.P. (2007) “Auditor specialization, perceived audit quality, and audit fees in the local government audit market”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26:705–732.
10.
McCueC.P. (2001) “Local government accountants as public managers: An evolving role”, State & Local Government Review, 33:144–157.
11.
MockT. and SametM. (1982) “A multi-attribute model for audit evaluation”, in: Proceedings of the VI University of Kansas Symposium.
12.
ModlinS. (2012) “County government finance practices: What independent auditors are finding and what makes local government susceptible”, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 24(4):558–578.
13.
ModlinS. (2016a) “County government fleet purchasing practices: Financial efficiency v. need assertion”, Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 2 (1):15–30.
14.
ModlinS. (2016b) “Increasing transparency and efficiency: An examination of county government note disclosures”, Public Administration Research5(2): 59–69.
15.
ModlinS. and StewartL.M. (2014a) “Determining county government fiscal instability: Independent audit report findings and the prompting of state action”, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 26(3):405–428.
16.
ModlinS. and StewartL.M. (2014b) “Staff involvement in the external audit process: Reassessing independent auditor satisfaction levels among professionally administered county governments”, Public Administration Quarterly, 38(2):243–269.
North Carolina Department of State Treasurer Local Government Commission (2007) Technical Memorandum No. TM-80–02. N.C.G.S. 159–34 (a).
19.
RousmaniereP.F. (1980) Local Government Auditing – A Manual for Public Officials, New York: Council on Municipal Performance.
20.
RubinM.A. (1988) “Municipal audit fee determinants”, The Accounting Review, 63(2):219–236.
21.
SamelsonD.P., LowensohnS.H. and JohnsonL.E. (2006) “The determinants of perceived audit quality and auditee satisfaction in local government”, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 18(2):139–166.
22.
SchroederM.S., SolomanI. and VickreyD.W. (1986) “Audit quality: The perceptions of audit-committee chairpersons and audit partners”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 5:86–94.
23.
SuttonS.G. (1993) “Toward an understanding of the factors affecting the quality of the audit process”, Decision Sciences, 24:88–105.
24.
SuttonS.G. and LampeJ.C. (1993) “Formulating a process measurement for audit quality”, in: Proceedings of the 1990 University of Southern California Audit Judgement Symposium.
