The failure of key EU Member States to respect the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) a few years after its inception triggered a heated debate on how to reform the framework of fiscal policy coordination in the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). This paper analyzes 101 reform proposals presented by professional academic and non-academic economists prior to March 2005, when the Council of the European Union adopted a revised version of the SGP. Roughly four different schools of thought concerning the reform of the SGP are identified. in line with the main findings of the political economy literature, all four schools of thought share the view that in the absence of specific rules fiscal policy would lead to excessive deficits and hence affect the conduct of the common monetary policy. However, beyond this common denominator, there is no consensus on how best to co-ordinate fiscal policy.
We present several explanations for the multitude of proposals, the most important being the present lack of a consensus in the economics profession concerning the role of fiscal policy. Economists hold diverging views on the goals, instruments, efficiency and institutions for fiscal policy-making. This state of affairs is in sharp contrast to the case of monetary policy. Also, the euro area is the first case where monetary policy-making is centralized while fiscal policy-making is decentralized to national governments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlesinaA. (2001), ‘The Stability and Growth Pact: Experiences and perspectives’, A comment on Buti in Temi di Finanza Pubblica, MonorchioA. and VerdeA. (eds.), Cacucci Editore, Bari.
2.
ArdyB.BeggI.HodsonD.MaherI. and MayesD. G. (2006), Adjusting to EMU, Basingstoke, Pal-grave, Macmillan.
3.
AuerbachA. (1994), ‘The U.S. fiscal problem: where we are, how we got here and where we're going’, NBER Working paper series no. 4709.
4.
BeanC. R. (1992) ‘Economic and monetary union in Europe’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 31–52.
5.
BeetsmaR. and DebrunX. (2003), ‘Reconciling stability and growth: Smart pacts and structural reforms’, IMF Working Paper no. 174.
6.
BlinderA. S. and SolowR. M. (1974), ‘Analytical foundations of fiscal policy’ in BlinderA. S.So-lowR. M.BreakG. F.SteinerP. O. and NetzerD. (eds), The economics of public finances, Brookings, Washington DC.
7.
BofingerP. (2003), ‘Why the Stability and Growth Pact provides neither stability nor growth?’, Universität Würzburg, mimeo.
8.
BordoM. and JonungL. (2003), ‘The future of EMU: What does the history of monetary unions tell us?’, chapter 3 in CapieF. and WoodG. (eds), Monetary unions. Theory, history, public choice, Routledge, London.
9.
BriottiG. (2005), ‘Economic reactions to public finance consolidation: A survey of the literature’, European Central Bank, Occasional paper series no.38.
10.
BrunilaA.ButiM., and J. in ‘t Veld (2003), ‘Cyclical stabilisation in Europe: How effective are automatic stabilisers?’, Empirica, Vol. 30, pp. 1–24.
11.
BuiterW.CorsettiG. and RubiniN. (1993), ‘Maastricht fiscal rules’, Economic Policy, 16, pp. 57–100.
12.
CabralA. J. (2001), ‘Main aspects of the working of the SGP’, in A. Brunila, ButiM. and FrancoD. (eds.), The Stability and Growth Pact; the architecture of fiscal policy in EMU, Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp. 139–157.
13.
CalmforsL. (2003), ‘Fiscal policy to stabilise the domestic economy in the EMU: What can we learn from monetary policy?’, CESifo Economic Studies, Vol. 49, no. 3.
14.
CalmforsL. and CorsettiG. (2004), ‘How to reform Europe's policy framework’, World Economics, Vol. 4, no. 1
De GrauweP. and VanhaverbekeW. (1991), ‘Is Europe an optimum currency area? Evidence from regional data’, CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 555.
17.
De MelloL., KongsrudP. M.and R. Price, (2004), ‘Saving behaviour and the effectiveness of fiscal policy’, Economics department, OECD, working paper no. 397.
18.
EichengreenB. (1991), ‘Is Europe an optimum currency area?’, NBER Working Paper no. 3579.
19.
EichengreenB. (2003), ‘Institutions for fiscal stability’, University of California, Berkeley, mimeo.
20.
European Commission, (2005), Public finances in EMU 2005, European Economy no. 3, Brussels.
21.
FatásA. and MihovI., (2002), ‘The case for restricting fiscal policy discretion’, Discussion paper series, no. 3277.
22.
FatásA., von HagenJ., HallettA. H., SiebertH. and StrauchR., (2003), ‘Stability and Growth in Europe: Towards a better pact’, CEPR Report.
23.
FitoussiJ-P. (2002), ‘The Stability (and Growth) Pact and monetary policy’, Committee for Economic and AffairsMonetary, briefing paper no. 4.
24.
FriedmanM. (1968), ‘The role of monetary policy’, American Economic Review, Vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–17.
25.
HemmingR.KellM. and MahfouzS. (2002), ‘The effectiveness of fiscal policy in stimulating economic activity – A review of the literature’, International Monetary Fund, WP/02/208.
26.
HicksJ. (1967), ‘Monetary policy and history – An attempt at perspective’, chapter 9 in J. Hicks, Critical essays in monetary theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27.
HodsonD. (2005), ‘Economic governance and the dual outcome in euro area fiscal policy, 1999–2002’, Ph. D. Dissertation, LSE.
28.
Hughes HallettA., KattaiR., and LewisJ. (2007) ‘Early warning or just wise after the event? the problem of using cyclically-adjusted budget deficits for fiscal surveillance’, CEPR discussion paper no. 6213.
29.
MathieuC. and SterdyniakH. (2003), ‘Reforming the SGP: Breaking the ice’, OFCE working paper no. 2003–02.
30.
OrphanidesA. (2000), ‘The quest for prosperity without inflation’, working paper no. 15, European Central Bank.
31.
OrphanidesA. and WilliamsJ. C. (2005), ‘The decline of activist stabilization policy: Natural rate mispercep-tions, learning, and expectations’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 29, pp. 1927–1950.
32.
Pisani-FerryJ. (2002), ‘Fiscal discipline and policy coordination in the Eurozone: Assessment and proposals’, in Ministerie van Financiën, Budgetary Policy in E(M)U: Design and Challenge, the Hague.
33.
SilgonerM. A.ReitschulerG. and Crespo-CuaresmaJ. (2003), ‘The fiscal smile: the effectiveness and limits of fiscal stabilizers’, International Monetary Fund, WP/03/182.
34.
TanziV. (2004), ‘The Stability and Growth Pact. Its role and future’, Cato Journal, Vol. 24, no. 1–2.
35.
UhligH. (2002), ‘One money, but many fiscal policies in Europe: What are the consequences?’, CEPR discussion paper series no. 3296.
36.
von HagenJ., (2002), ‘More growth for stability. Reflections on fiscal policy in Euroland’, ZEI University of Bonn, mimeo.
37.
WyploszC. (2002), ‘Fiscal policy: Institutions vs rules’, bilaga 5 in Stabiliseringspolitik i valutaunionen, SOU 2002:16, Stockholm.
38.
AlesinaA. (2001), “The Stability and Growth Path: Experiences and Perspectives”, A comment on M. Buti, in Temi di Finanza Pubblica by A Monorchio and A. Verde, Cacucci Editore, Bari.
39.
AllsoppC. and ArtisM.J. (2003), “The Assessment: EMU, Four Years On”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 19, No. 1.
40.
AngeloS., MarterbauerM., MozartI., RossmannB., SchratzenstallerM. and TemplN. (2004), “Alternatives to the Stability and Growth Pact: Proposals for a New EU Fiscal Policy Regime”, Austrian federal chamber of labour, AK, mimeo.
41.
AnnetA., DecressinJ. and DepplerM. (2005), “Reforming the Stability and Growth Pact 05/02”, IMF Policy Discussion Paper 05/2.
42.
ArestisP., McCauleyK. and SawyerM. (1999), “The Future of the Euro: Is There an Alternative to the SGP?”, the Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper No. 296.
43.
BalassoneF., FrancoD. and R. Giordano (2004), “Market Induced Fiscal Discipline: Is there a Fall-Back Solution for Rule-Failure?”, Paper presented at XVI Villa Mondragone International Economic Seminar University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’.
44.
BaryshK. (2003), “A Pact for Stability and Growth”, Centre for European Reform Policy Brief
45.
BeetsmaR. and DebrunX. (2003), “Reconciling Stability and Growth: Smart Pacts and Structural Reforms”, IMF Working Paper, No. 174.
46.
BeetsmaR. and DebrunX. (2005), “Implementing the Stability and Growth Pact: Enforcement and Procedural Flexibility”, ECB Working Papers Series, No. 433.
47.
BeggI. and SchelkleW. (2004), “Can Fiscal Policy Co-ordination Be Made to Work Effectively?” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4.
48.
BeggI. and SchelkleW. (2004), “The Pact is Dead: Long Live the Pact”, National Institute Economic Review, No. 189.
49.
BeggI., HodsonD. and MaherI. (2003), “Economic Policy Coordination in the European Union”, National Institute Economic Review, No. 183.
50.
BelkeA. and GrosD. (1998), “Asymmetric Shocks and EMU: on a Stability Fund”, Intereconomics.
51.
BibowJ. (2003), “Is Europe Doomed to Stagnation? An Analysis of the Current Crisis and Recommendations for Reforming Macroeconomic Policymaking in Euroland”, University of Hamburg, Working Paper, No. 379.
52.
BlanchardO. and GiavazziF. (2003), “Improving the SGP through a Proper Accounting of Public Investment”, MIT mimeo.
53.
BofingerP. (2003a), “The Stability and Growth Pact Neglects the Policy Mix between Fiscal and Monetary Policy”, Intereconomics.
54.
BofingerP. (2003b), “Why the Stability and Growth Pact Provides neither Stability nor Growth?”, Universität Würzburg, mimeo.
55.
BofingerP. and MayerE. (2004), “The Stability and Growth Pact: Time to Rebuild!”, Paper presented Annual Meeting of the German Economic Association in Dresden.
56.
BrückT. and ZwienerR. (2004), “Fiscal Policy Rules for Stabilisation and Growth: A Simulation Analysis of Deficit and Expenditure Targets in a Monetary Union”, German Institute for Economic Research, mimeo.
57.
BrunettaR. and TriaG. (2003), “The SGP: the Fiscal Rules need changing”, Review of the economic conditions in Italy, No. 2
58.
BrunilaA. (2002), “Fiscal Policy: Co-ordination, Discipline and Stabilisation”, Bank of Finland PaperWorking, No. 7.
59.
BuiterW. and GrafeC. (2004), “Patching up the Pact: Some Suggestions for enhancing Fiscal Sustainability and Macroeconomic Stability in an Enlarged European Union”, Economics of Transition, Vol. 12, No. 1.
BuiterW. (2003a), “Ten Commandments for a Fiscal Rule in E(M)U”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 19, No. 1.
62.
BuiterW. (2003b), “How to Reform the Stability and Growth Pact”, Central Banking, Vol. 8, No. 3.
63.
ButiM., EijffingerS. and FrancoD. (2003), “Revisiting the SGP: Grand Design or Internal Adjustment?”, European Economy, Economic Paper, No. 180.
64.
ButiM. and PenchL. (2004), “Why do large Countries flout the Stability and Growth Pact? and what can be done about it?”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 41, No.4.
65.
ButiM. and P. Van den Noord (2004), “Fiscal Policy in EMU: Rules, Discretion and Political Incentives”, European Economy, Economic Paper, No. 206.
66.
CalmforsL. (2003a), “Fiscal Policy to Stabilise the Domestic Economy in the EMU: What Can We Learn from Monetary Policy?”, CESifo Economic Studies, Vol. 49, No. 3.
67.
CalmforsL. (2003b), “Fiscal Policy and Macroeconomic Stabilisation in the Euro Area: Possible Reforms of the Stability and Growth Pact and National Decision Making Processes”, Report on the European Economy 2003, EEAG, European Economic Advisory Group at CESifo, Munich.
68.
CalmforsL. and CorsettiG. (2004), “How to Reform Europe's Policy Framework”, World Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1.
69.
CanzoneriB.M. and DibaT. D.(2000), “The Stability and Growth Pact Revisited: A Delicate Balance or an Albatross?”, Georgetown University, mimeo.
CollignonS. (2003), “Is Europe Going Far Enough? Reflections on the EU's Economic Governance”, European Political Economy Review, Vol. 1, No. 2.
72.
CreelJ. (2003), “Ranking Fiscal Policy Rules: the Golden Rule of Public Finances vs. the SGP”, OFCE Working Paper, No. 2003–04.
73.
CrowleyP.M. (2003), “Do We Really Need a Stability and Growth Pact for EMU?”, Presented at the conference ‘Building EU Economic Government: Revising the Rules?’ NYU, London.
74.
De GrauweP. (2003), “Towards an Intelligent Stability and Growth Pact”, University of Leuven, mimeo.
75.
de HaanJ., BergerH. and D-J. Jansen (2003), “The End of the Stability and Growth Pact?”, CESifo Working Paper, No. 1093.
76.
de HaanJ., BergerH. and D-J. Jansen (2004), “Why Did the Stability and Growth Pact Fail?”, De Nederlandsche Bank, mimeo.
77.
de SousaH.Z. (2004), “The Future of the SGP as a Tool for Economic Policy Coordination”, Groupe d'étude et de recherches, Notre Europe Policy Papers, No. 9.
78.
DerooseS. and LangedijkS. (2003), “Economic Policy Coordination in EMU: Accomplishments and Challenges”, In: EMU and Economic Policy in Europe: the Challenges of the Early Years, ButiM. and SapirA. (eds.), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
79.
DerooseS. and LangedijkS. (2005), “Improving the Stability and Growth Pact: the Commission's Three Pillar Approach”, European Economy, Occasional Paper, No. 15.
80.
EichengreenB. (2003a), “Institutions for Fiscal Stability”, University of California, Berkeley, mimeo.
81.
EichengreenB. (2003b), “What to Do with the Stability Pact”, Intereconomics.
82.
EichengreenB. and WyploszC. (1998), “The Stability Pact: More than a Minor Nuisance?”, Economic Policy, Vol. 13, No. 26.
83.
EnderleinH. (2004), “Break it, Don't fix it!”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4.
84.
von Hagen FatásA.J., HallettA.H., SiebertH. and StrauchR. (2003), “Stability and Growth in Europe: Towards a Better Pact”, CEPR Report.
85.
FischerJ. (2004), “The Peaks and Troughs of the Stability and Growth Pact”, Sverige Riksbank, Economic Review, No.1.
86.
FitoussiJ-P. (2002), “The Stability and Growth Pact and Monetary Policy”, Committee for Economic and AffairsMonetary, Briefing Paper, No. 4.
87.
FlandreauM., J.-L, Le Cacheux and ZumerF. (1998), “Stability without Pact? Lessons from the European Gold Standard, 1880–1914“, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 1872.
88.
FloresE., GiudiceG. and TurriniA. (2005), “The Framework for Fiscal Policy in the EU: What Future after Five Years of Experience?”, European Economy, Economic Paper, No. 223.
89.
FogelK. G. and S. C. Saxena (2004), “EMU Policy and the Stability and Growth Pact: Prospects of Macro-economic Stability”, Global Economic Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2.
90.
GoldsteinM. and WoglanG. (1992), “Market-Based Fiscal Discipline in Monetary Unions: Evidence from U. S. Municipal Bond Market”, In: Establishing a Central bank: Issues in Europe and Lessons from the US, CanzoneriM.B., GrilliV. and MassonP. R.(eds.) PR CE London.
91.
GrosD. (2004), “EU Public Finances Need New Watchdog”, European Voice.
92.
GrosD., MayerT. and UbideA. (2004), “The Nine Lives of the Stability Pact”, CEPS Report.
93.
HefekerC. (2003), “Credible At Last? Reforming the Stability Pact”, Intereconomics.
94.
HeinE. and TrugerA. (2004), “Macroeconomic Co-ordination as an Economic Policy Concept Opportunities and Obstacles in the EMU”, WSI Discussion Paper, No. 125.
95.
HerzogB. (2004), “EMU and Economic Policy Focus: Stability and Growth Pact and Sustainability”, Presented at the XVI Villa Mondragone Conference (CEIS) in Roma.
96.
HerzogB. (2004), “Stability and Growth Pact and its Institutional Inconsistencies”, Presented at the second Pan-European Conference of ECPR-Standing Group on the European Union.
97.
HM Treasury (2004), “The Stability and Growth Pact: A Discussion Paper”, HM Treasury Discussion Paper.
98.
HodsonD. and MaherI. (2004), “Soft Law and Sanctions: Economic Policy Co-ordination and Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 11, No. 5.
99.
HornG.A. (2004), “On the Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact?”, Briefing paper for the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament.
100.
InmanR.P. (1998), “Do Balanced Budget Rules Work? U.S. Experience and Possible Lessons for the EMU”, NBER Working Paper, No. 5838.
101.
IrlenbushB., WildburgerK., J. Shültze and M. Sut-ter (2003), “Voting in EMU: An Experimental Study of Institutional Innovation and the Role of Communication in the Stability and Growth Pact”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4.
102.
LehmentH. (2002), “European Fiscal Policies under the Stability and Growth Pact”, Kiel Institute of World Economics, Working Paper, No.1098.
103.
LindbeckA. and NiepeltD. (2004), “Improving the SGP: Taxes and Delegation rather than Fines Through a Proper Accounting of Public Investment”, Stockholm University Institute for International Economic Studies, Seminar Paper No. 733.
104.
MajocchiA. (2003), “Fiscal Policy Co-ordination in the European Union and the Financing of the Community Budget”, University of Trento School of International Studies Working Paper, 01/03.
105.
MarinheiroC. J. F. (2005), “Has the Stability and Growth Pact Stabilised? Evidence from a Panel of 12 European Countries and some Implications for the Reform of the Pact”, CESifo Working Paper, No. 1411.
106.
MathieuC. and SterdyniakH. (2003), “Reforming the SGP: Breaking the Ice”, OFCE working paper, No. 2003–02.
107.
MillsP. and QuinetA. (2002), “How to Allow the Automatic Stabilisers to Operate Fully?”, In: The Behaviour of Fiscal Authorities, ButiM., Von HagenJ. and C. Martinez-Mongay, (eds.), Palgrave, Basing Stoke.
108.
MontaninoA. (2004), “More Focus on Long Term: Is There a Need to Change the Maastricht Criteria?”, Presented at the XVI Villa Mondragone Conference (CEIS) in Roma.
109.
MortensenJ. (2004), “Economic Policy Coordination in EMU: What Role for the SGP?”, CEPS Working Document, No. 02.
110.
MuscatelliV.A., NataleP. and TirelliP. (2003), “A Simple and Flexible Alternative to the SGP Deficit Ceiling. Is it at Hand?”, CESifo Working Paper, No. 06.
111.
PetersenH.-G. (2003), “Growth Policy as Micro-Policy: Setting the Right Incentives for Capital Formation and Investment”, Paper presented at the 3rd meeting of the French-German Council of Economic Advisors.
112.
Pisani-FerryJ. (2002), “Fiscal Discipline and Policy Coordination in the Eurozone: Assessment and Proposals”, in Ministerie van Financiën, Budgetary Policy in E(M)U: Design and Challenge, the Hauge.
113.
CoeuréB. and Pisani-FerryJ. (2003), “A Sustain-ability Pact for the Eurozone”, Presented at HM Treasury's Keynes Seminar on ‘Fiscal policy and Economic Governance in the Eurozone: Where do we stand?’.
114.
Price Waterhouse Coopers (2004), “How Can the Stability and Growth Pact Be Reformed?”, Economic European Outlook.
115.
RailavoJ. (2004), “Stability Consequences of Fiscal Policy Rules”, Bank of Finland, Discussion paper, No. 1.
116.
RazinA. and SadkaE. (2002), “The Stability and Growth Pact as an Impediment to Privatizing Social Security”, NBER Working Paper, No. 9278.
117.
RipollJ. (2003), “Rogoff's Central Banker cum Stability and Growth Pact: Mutually Reinforcing Institutions or a Cursed Overdose?”, Paper presented at the SASE session, Aix-en-Provence.
118.
RosaJ-J. (2003), “From Stability to Growth: From Deficits to Structural Reform”, Comment on a paper presented at the 3d meeting of the German-French Council of Economic Advisers.
119.
RostowskiJ. (2004), “The Stability and Growth Pact – Essential and Unfeasibl””, Centre for Social and ResearchEconomic, Warsaw Studies and Analyses, No. 275.
120.
SalveminiG. (2003), “Fiscal Policy and European Rules: An Open Discussion”, Review of the economic conditions in Italy, No. 2.
121.
SaracenoF. and P. Monperrus-Veroni (2004), “A Simple Proposal for a ‘Debt-Sensitive Stability Pact’”, Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Économiques, mimeo.
122.
SavonaP. and VivianiC. (2003), “The Impact of the SGP on Real Economic Growth: Automatic Mechanism or Policy Discretion?”, Review of the economic conditions in Italy, No. 2.
123.
SchelkleW. (2004), “EMU's Second Chance. Enlargement and the Reform of Fiscal Policy Coordination”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 11, No. 5.
124.
SchuknechtL. (2004), “EU Fiscal Rules: Issues and Lessons from Political Economy”, ECB Working Paper, No. 421.
125.
TanziV. (2004), “The Stability and Growth Pact: Its Role and Future”, Cato Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1–2.
126.
UhligH. (2002), “One Money, but Many Fiscal Policies in Europe: What are the Consequences?”, CEPR Discussion paper series, No. 3296.
127.
VerdeA. (2004a), “Possible Alternatives or Modifications to the Stability and Growth Pact”, Quaderno di ricerca, No. 133, Osservatorio degli studi monetari OCSM della LUISS Guido Carli.
128.
VerdeA. (2004b), “The Stability and Growth Pact in Rainy Days: An Alternative View”, LUISS University Rome, mimeo.
129.
VisaggioM. (2004), “Does the Growth and Stability Pact Provide an Adequate and Consistent Fiscal Rule?”, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Dipartimento di Economia, mimeo.
130.
von HagenJ. (2002), “More Growth for Stability: Reflections on Fiscal Policy in Euroland”, ZEI University of Bonn, mimeo.
131.
WarinT. (2004), “Should and/or Could the SGP Be Saved?”, Middlebury College Economics Discussion Paper, No. 04–15.
132.
WarinT. (2005), “Stability and Growth Pact: An Index to Trigger an Early Warning Earlier?”, Middle-bury College Economics Discussion Paper, No. 05-02.
133.
WealeM. (2004), “National Savings and the Stability and Growth Pact”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4.
134.
WillettT.D. (1999), “Fiscal Rigor or Rigor Mortis: Analysis of the Stability Pact”, Claremont Graduate University and Claremont McKenna College, mimeo.
135.
Wren-LewisS. (2003), “The Compatibility between Monetary and Fiscal Policies in EMU: A Perspective from the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level”, In: Monetary and Fiscal Policies in EMU: Interactions and Coordination, M. Buti (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
136.
WyploszC. (2002), “Fiscal Policy: Institutions vs. Rules”, Bilaga 5 in Stabiliseringspolitik i valutaunionen, SOU 2002:16, Stockholm.
137.
XenakiA. (2004), “Does the EU Need a Stability and Growth Pact?”, European Institute of Public Administration EIPASCOPE, No. 2.
138.
ZimmermannK.F. (2004), “The Stability and Growth Pact in the EU: No Change or Greater Flexibility?”, Paper presented at the 3rd meeting of the German-French Council of Economic Adviser.
