Higher education institutions face persistent crises requiring adaptive, communicative leadership. This mixed-methods study examines how middle-level academic administrators (i.e., departmental heads, chairs, school directors, and unit administrators) manage crises, communicate resilience, and sustain engagement. Drawing on Hirschman’s Exit–Voice–Loyalty (EVL) framework and Buzzanell’s Communication Theory of Resilience (CTR), the study analyzed responses from participants across Arkansas public 4-year universities. Findings show that crisis management constitutes a normative rather than exceptional dimension of contemporary academic leadership. Respondents indicated strong adoption of CTR processes (i.e., crafting normalcy, affirming identity anchors, maintaining networks, and legitimizing negative emotions while foregrounding productive action), alongside significant relationships among EVL variables, indicating that leadership decisions during crises are negotiated rather than binary. Qualitative themes revealed four resilience strategies: strategic unit advocacy (persistent yet often unreciprocated upward communication), strategic emotional labor (mediating institutional stress and faculty morale), personal resilience and caregiving (balancing empathy and endurance), and leveraging external networks (using peer alliances when vertical trust fails).
AgrestiA. (2018). An introduction to categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Wiley.
2.
AhluwaliaP. S. (2025). The rise of quiet quitting: Work ethic, alienation, and resistance in modern employment. Siddhanta’s International Journal of Advanced Research in Arts & Humanities, 3(1), 92–106. https://sijarah.com/
3.
BiglanA. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701
4.
BookerL.Jr. (2014). Crisis management: Changing times for colleges. Journal of College Admission, Winter(222), 16–23.
BrooksM.CreelyE.LaletasS. (2022). Coping through the unknown: School staff wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, Article 100146.
7.
BullerJ. L.CiprianoR. E. (2015). A toolkit for department chairs. Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
BuzzanellP. (2010). Resilience: Talking, resisting, and imagining new normalcies into being. Journal of Communication, 60, 1–14.
9.
BuzzanellP. (2017). Communication theory of resilience: Enacting adaptive-transformative processes when families experience loss and disruption. In BrathwaiteD.SuterE.FloydsK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 98–109). Routledge.
10.
CadimiI.LakmitiL. N.RguibiK.SlalmiH.MalainineC. (2021). Consumer complaint behavior: Beyond Hirschman’s exit-voice-loyalty framework. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 2(5), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5394989
11.
CanielsM.HatakI. (2022). Employee resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely adverse events?American Psychologist, 33(2), 297–328.
12.
CarrollJ. (1991). Career paths of departmental chairs in doctoral granting institutions. Center for the Study of the Department Chair, Washington State University.
13.
CarrollJ.WolvertonM. (2004). Who becomes a chair?New Directions for Higher Education, 126, 3–10.
14.
ChakradharK.WaddillP.KleinhansK. (2018). Resilience and multigenerational academic work environment in the United States. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 16(4), 374–394.
15.
ClemonsA. (2024). A phenomenological study of lived experiences during COVID-19 and Hurricane Ian. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 46(5), 563–578.
16.
ClemonsA. (2025). Supporting faculty resilience: Departmental chairs’ role in community building amid trauma. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(1), 16–31.
17.
CohenA.KiskerC. (2010). The Shaping of American Higher Education: Emergence and growth of the contemporary system. Jossey-Bass.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
20.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
21.
CreswellJ. WWheelerD.SeagrenA.EglyN.BeyerK. (1990). The academic chairperson’s handbook. University of Nebraska.
22.
CzechK. (2007). Communication and leadership: Faculty perceptions of the department chair (Publication No. 771) [Doctoral dissertations, University of San Diego].
23.
de los ReyesE.BlanninJ.CohrssenC.MahatM. (2022). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches in the time of the 21st century pandemics: A narrative review. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(1), 39–56.
24.
DettmarK. (2022). How to chair a department. Johns Hopkins Press.
25.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
26.
DoerfelM.HarrisJ. (2017). Resilience processes. In ScottC.LewisL. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons.
27.
DoerfelM.LaiC.ChewningL. (2010). The evolutionary role of interorganizational communication: Modeling social capital in disaster contexts. Human Communication Research, 36(2), 125–162.
28.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. The Guilford Press.
29.
FarrellD. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 596–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/255909
30.
FisherR. A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2340521
31.
GleesonE. (2016). Re-conceptualising Hirschman’s Exit, Voice & Loyalty model for contemporary organisational contexts [Master’s thesis, The University of Notre Dame Australia].
32.
GmelchW.BurnsJ. (1994). Sources of stress for academic department chairpersons. Journal of Educational Administration, 32, 79–94.
33.
GmelchW.MiskinV. (2011). Department chair leadership skills. Atwood.
34.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
35.
GreerT.ShuckB. (2020). Mounting the new guard: The golden rule as a basis for organizational culture change in response to challenges in academia. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 22(1), 102–112.
36.
GuQ.DayC. (2007). Teachers’ resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1302–1316.
37.
GunsalusC. K. (2021). The college administrator’s survival guide. Harvard University Press.
38.
HalonenH. (2013). Promoting effective program leadership in psychology: A benchmarking strategy. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 318–329.
39.
HarterL. (2013). The work of art. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 2(3), 326–336.
40.
HechtI. (2004). The professional development of department chairs. New Directions for Higher Education, 126, 27–44.
41.
HechtI.HiggersonM.GmelchW.TuckerA. (1999). The department chair as academic leader. The American Council on Education and the Oryx Press.
42.
HirschmanA. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
43.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
44.
JochumC. J. (2021). The department chair: A practical guide to effective leadership. Rowman & Littlefield.
45.
JohnP. (2017). Finding exits and voices: Albert Hirschman’s contribution to the study of public services. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 512–529.
46.
JohnsrudL. K.RosserV. J. (2002). Faculty members’ morale and their intention to leave: A multilevel explanation. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777162
47.
KapucuN.KhosaS. (2013). Disaster resiliency and culture of preparedeness for university and college campuses. Administration & Society, 45(1), 3–37.
48.
LattucaL. R.StarkJ. S. (2009). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
49.
LeviaL.KaurG. (2023). Targets’ coping responses to workplace bullying with moderating role of perceived organizational tolerance: A two-phased study of faculty in higher education institutions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1083–1100.
50.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data (3rd ed.). Wiley.
51.
MangenC.BrivotM. (2015). The challenge of sustaining organizational hybridity: The role of power and agency. Human Relations, 68(4), 659–684.
52.
MannariniT.RizzoM.BrodskyA.BuckinghamS.ZhaoJ.RochiraA.FediA. (2022). The potential of psychological connectedness: Mitigating the impacts of COVID-19 through sense of community and community resilience. Journal of Community Psychology, 50(5), 2273–2289.
53.
McDonaldJ. H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd ed.). Sparky House Publishing.
54.
PaulhusD. L.VazireS. (2007). The self-report method. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). Guilford Press.
55.
PlimmerG.BermanE.MalinenS.FrankenE.NaswallK.KuntzJ.LofgrenK. (2022). Resilience in public sector managers: The role of leader-facilitated emotion management. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 42(2), 338–367.
56.
RichardsonB.ManingerB. (2016). “We were all in the same boat”: An exploratory study of communal coping in disaster recovery. Southern Communication Journal, 81(2), 107–122.
57.
SeegerM.SellnowT. (2016). Narratives of crisis: Telling stories of ruin and renewal. Stanford University Press.
SlagleD. R.Chatham-CarpenterA.WilliamsA. M. (2022). A discourse of renewal: Higher Education leadership and crisis communication during Black Lives Matter. Public Integrity, 27(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2068320
60.
SlagleD. R.McIntyreJ. J.Chatham-CarpenterA.ReedH. A. (2021). The perfect storm in the midst of a pandemic: The use of information within an institution’s concurrent crises. Online Information Review, 45(4), 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2020-0415
61.
TandbergD. A. (2013). The conditioning role of state higher education governance structures. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 506–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777300
62.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications
63.
TrellysR.RussellC. (2013). Leadership in higher education examining professional development need for department chairs. Review of Higher Education & Self-Learning, 6(21), 38–57.
64.
UlmerR. R.SellnowT. L.SeegerM. W. (2019). Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
65.
WeickK. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Random House.
66.
WeickK. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
67.
WilsonR. (2001). Beggar, psychologist, mediator, maid: The thankless job of a chairman. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, 10–13.
68.
WolvertonM.AckermanR.HoltS. (2005). Preparing for leadership: What academic department chairs need to know. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27, 227–238.
