Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research centers and institutes (RCIs) are increasingly prominent features of public affairs education, yet systematic evidence about their roles remains limited. This study examines empirical data about how RCIs operate across the domains of applied research, education, and service. Drawing on a national survey of public policy-related RCIs from universities that have leading public affairs programs, the analysis documents substantial variation in RCI structure, governance, funding, student involvement, and programmatic alignment. The findings show that RCIs frequently function as boundary-spanning infrastructure that supports applied research, experiential learning, and civic engagement, but that their integration into academic programs is uneven and often informal. Many RCIs operate at arm’s length from public affairs programs despite overlapping missions. The article introduces a typology of RCIs to clarify these patterns and concludes by identifying implications for public affairs education and accreditation.

Keywords

research centers and institutes public affairs education applied research experiential learning civic engagement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alstete

J. W.

(2007). College accreditation: Managing revitalization and public respect. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bird

S. R.

Litt

J. S.

Wang

(2004). Creating status of women reports: Institutional housekeeping as “women’s work.” NWSA Journal, 16(1), 194–206.

Boardman

Bozeman

(2007). Role strain in university research centers and institutes. Journal of Higher Education, 78(4), 430–463.

Boardman

P. C.

Corley

E. A.

(2008). University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy, 37(5), 900–913.

Bozeman

Boardman

(2003). Managing the new multipurpose, multidiscipline university research center: Institutional innovation in the academic community. IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.

Brandsen

(2022). Accreditation in public administration research. In Bottom

K. A.

Diamond

Dunning,

P. T.

Elliott

I. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of teaching public administration (pp. 210–217). Routledge.

Clark

Menifield

C. E.

(2005). The dynamics of NASPAA accreditation: A challenge for organizational expansion? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(1), 35–43.

Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation (COPRA). (2025, March 25). Policies and procedures for peer review and accreditation. NASPAA.

Denhardt

R. B.

(2001). The big questions of public administration education. Public Administration Review, 61(5), 526–534.

10.

Denhardt

R. B.

Denhardt

J. V.

(2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559.

11.

Geiger

R. L.

(1993). Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II. Oxford University Press.

12.

Guarino

C. M.

Borden

V. M. H.

(2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58, 672–694.

13.

Guston

D. H.

(2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408.

14.

Hale

(2017). NASPAA: The public administration process and approach toward accreditation. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 7(SI1), 69–71.

15.

Johnson

R. G.

III Rivera

M. A.

(2007). Refocusing graduate public affairs education: A need for diversity competencies in human resource management. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(1), 15–27.

16.

Martin

B. R.

(2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, 41(7), 1219–1239.

17.

Merritt

C. C.

(2019). What makes an organization public? Managers’ perceptions in the mental health and substance abuse treatment system. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(4), 411–424.

18.

Mewbourne

J. P.

(2025). Fitting in: Aligning NASPAA standards with the unique needs of first-generation graduate students [Doctoral dissertation. University of La Verne].

19.

Moulton

(2009). Putting together the publicness puzzle: A framework for realizing the value of public organizations. Public Administrative Review, 69(5), 889–900.

20.

Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA). (2023). NASPAA accreditation standards (amended version 2023). https://www.naspaa.org/sites/default/files/docs/2024-01/NASPAA%20Accreditation%20Standards%20-%202024%20FINAL%20with%20rationale.pdf

21.

O’Meara

(2007). Striking for what? Exploring the pursuit of prestige. In Smart

J. C.

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 22, pp. 121–179). Springer.

22.

Ponomariov

B. L.

Boardman

P, C.

(2010). Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns throughout new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39(5), 613–624.

23.

Raffel

J. A.

(2010). What we have learned from the NASPAA standards review process. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(1), 5–12.

24.

Ramaley

J. A.

(2014). The changing role of higher education: Learning to deal with wicked programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(3), 7–22.

25.

Roberts

(2025, January 21). False globalism: Public administration in the United States in the twenty-first century. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 47(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2024.2441040

26.

Rubaii

(2022). Preparing graduates to address big global issues: Is accreditation helping or hindering? In Bottom

K. A.

Diamond

Dunning

P. T.

Elliott

I. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of teaching public administration (pp. 227–235). Routledge.

27.

Rubaii

Calarusse

(2014). Preparing public service professionals for a diverse and changing workforce and citizenry: Evaluating the progress of NASPAA programs in competency assessment. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(3), 285–304.

28.

Sandmann

L. R.

(2008). Conceptualization of the scholarship of engagement in higher education: A strategic review, 1996-2006. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(1), 91–104.

29.

Slaughter

Leslie

L. L.

(1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University Press.

30.

Stahler

G. J.

Tash

W. R.

(1994). Centers and institutes in the research university: Issues, problems, and prospects. Journal of Higher Education, 65(5), 540–554.

31.

Thornton

P. H.

Ocasio

Lounsbury

(2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.

32.

Van Jaarsveldt

L. C.

deVries

M. S.

Kroukamp

(2023). The quality and accreditation of online public administration programs. Administratio Publica, 31(1), 42–59.

33.

Van Wart

Hamilton

Drudy

(2022). Considering the roles of professional accrediting bodies in online programme quality: The case of the NASPAA. Quality in Higher Education, 28(2), 168–185.

34.

Weerts

D. J.

Sandmann

L. R.

(2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632–657.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Research Centers and Institutes in Public Affairs Education: Evidence on Structure,Activities,and Program Integration

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material